Content Revamping existing buildings to make them energy efficientApril Event: the future of Women in BusinessMay Event: the future of Green Architecture India e-commerceHow can design change the world?Club of Amsterdam blogNews about the FutureRecommended Book: The Greening of ArchitectureWhat keeps energy leaders awake at night?Futurist Portrait: Jørgen Randers Agenda Special supporters Club of Amsterdam SearchSubmit your articleContactSubscribe Welcome to the Club of Amsterdam Journal. Join the Club of Amsterdam in April aboutthe future of Women in Business, Thursday, April 24, 18:30 – 21:15 and in May the future of Green ArchitectureRetrofitting existing houses and historic buildings. Zero-energy buildings.May 29, 2014, 18:30 – 21:15 Felix F Bopp, Founder & Chairman Revamping existing buildings to make them energy efficient by Koen MortelmansSource: www.youris.com Energy efficient building companies join forces with researchers to cut the energy bill of existing buildings using both passive and active designs to reach energy efficiency. Tackling energy loss from buildings is one of the key objectives to reach greater sustainability, when it comes to energy consumption. The EU-funded BRICKER project aims to develop ways of reducing energy consumption by 50% in existing buildings, within the next four years. Specifically, it will turn public buildings in Spain, Turkey and Belgium into showcases to demonstrate the level of energy savings that can be achieved. Project coordinator Juan Ramón de las Cuevas Jiménez, is a mechanical engineer and a member of the Energy Efficiency Installations group at the technological centre of Spanish building contractor company Acciona, based in Madrid. He talks to youris.com about ways of improving energy efficiency in buildings. What are the main trends in making buildings more sustainable? Trends include the reduction of energy consumption through insulation and the use of energy from renewable sources, such as solar, biomass and geothermal energy. The market is moving towards low-energy consumption buildings. This is covered in the project. What is the key aspect, which makes this project unique? It combines different active and passive technologies to achieve energy efficiency, in an innovative way. The main breakthrough will stem from the development of an innovative trigeneration system for simultaneous generation of power, heating and cooling. Its power capacity will be around 150 kW and its thermal capacity, around 600 kW. How will you implement this solution? To produce the activation heat for this system, we will use roof mounted parabolic solar collectors, working on a higher-than-usual temperature, at about 250 to 270 °C. This system is already used in industry, but not yet for public buildings. Which other measures are you planning to use? In the best practices book that the project is planning to publish, we will take into consideration the renewable resources locally available in each region. We will use biomass boilers, generating heat from biomass, geothermal district heating and absorption chillers, which use a heat source providing the energy needed to drive the cooling system. This technology already exists, but installations will be tailor-made for the project. Passive technologies include new aerating windows, with an integrated, newly patented electronic heat exchanger, new PIR (PolyIsocyanurate)-based insulation foams with embedded phase-change materials (PCM’s)— which are substances capable of storing and releasing large amounts of energy—and state of the art ventilated facades, commercial windows and insulation panels. All in all, some technologies we use are already on the market, some are innovative. It remains a challenge to integrate both in real demonstration buildings. Are retrofitted buildings a better solution than building entirely new and more efficient buildings? We made calculations to prove that a 50% reduction of energy consumption is possible with retrofitting, starting from old and non-efficient buildings. The investment levels in such measures are limited to about 20% of the price to build a new similar building. The original article can be found here. April Event: the future of Women in Business the future of Women in BusinessApril 24, 2014, 18:30 – 21:15Location: Geelvinck Museum, Herengracht 518, 1017 CC Amsterdam [this is not the regular museum entrance]Supported by the Amsterdam Economic Board.The conference language is English. WithMylena Pierremont, Founding Partner, Ming Pai ConsultingIt is smart business to get more women in business Colby Stuart, International Creative Director, Quantum Brands BVBeyond gender differences in the world of business Cristiane de Morais Smith, Professor in Theoretical Physics, Utrecht University Caro Bamforth, Director of Corporate Communications, VliscoThe international business woman – ?? our Moderator is Annegien Blokpoel, CEO, PerspeXo May Event: the future of Green Architecture the future of Green ArchitectureRetrofitting existing houses and historic buildings.Zero-energy buildings with low-exergy storage.Thursday, May 29, 2014, 18:30 – 21:15Location: Museum Geelvinck Hinlopen Huis, Herengracht 518, 1017 CC Amsterdam [this is not the regular museum entrance]The conference language is English.A collaboration between Geelvinck Museum Hinlopen Huis and the Club of Amsterdam. With Fenneken Anneveld-van Wesel, Independent Architecture & Planning ProfessionalWhy modern technique and sustainability are important for the preservation of historic buildings. Gijs Hoen, Project Leader, Stadsherstel Amsterdam Paul de Ruiter, Architectenbureau Paul de Ruiter bvTowards a CO2-neutral society Mathias Lehner, founding partner, lehner guntherNEXTCity – Biodiversity Design leading to more Quality of Life for all Species Our Moderator is Tarik Yousif, Presenter at the Dutch public broadcaster NTR India e-commerce How can design change the world? The Savannah College of Art and Design (SCAD) is a private, nonprofit, accredited institution conferring bachelor’s and master’s degrees at distinctive locations and online to prepare talented students for professional careers. SCAD offers degrees in more than 40 majors, as well as minors in more than 60 disciplines, in Savannah and Atlanta, Georgia; in Hong Kong; in Lacoste, France; and online through SCAD eLearning. What is SCADpad? SCADpad evolved from one powerful question: How can design change the world? As our global population continues to grow and concentrate in cities, SCAD, as a transformer in art and design education, has cultivated an entirely new vision of an urban community. SCADpad embraces and advances the university’s deeply rooted commitment to adaptive reuse by utilizing a parking structure at SCAD Atlanta to create an inspirational and sustainable community that proposes an answer to the growing urban housing challenges cities are facing around the world. An interdisciplinary group of SCAD students, faculty, and alumni worked for 10 months to design and develop SCADpad — from its architectural footprint to custom furniture to remote home control — to fit in the mere 135-square-feet of a standard parking space. Each of the three SCADpad units has a unique theme and visual identity, reflecting SCAD’s global footprint. A common green space extends the living area, creating a community environment. An organic garden is fed by a greywater filtration and delivery system, while a composting and recycling center helps ensure there is minimal waste. A rapid prototyping area featuring a 3D printer lets residents customize their unit to their preferences and needs – a perfect way to maximize life in a micro house. Club of Amsterdam blog Club of Amsterdam bloghttp://clubofamsterdam.blogspot.com The Ukrainian Dilemma and the Bigger Pictureby Hardy F. Schloer, Owner, Schloer Consulting Group – SCG, Advisory Board of the Club of Amsterdam The impact of culture on educationby Huib Wursten, Senior Partner, itim International andCarel Jacobs is senior consultant/trainer for itim in The Netherlands, he is also Certification Agent for the Educational Sector of the Hofstede Centre. What more demand for meat means for the futureby Christophe Pelletier, The Happy Future Group Consulting Ltd. Inner peace and generosityby Elisabet Sahtouris, Holder of the Elisabet Sahtouris Chair in Living Economies, World Business Academy ICT4D: Top trends for 2014by Madanmohan Rao TPP — copyright versus free speechby Annie Machon, Director, LEAP Europe. Formerly MI5 Long-Term Science and Technology Policy – Russian Priorities for 2030by Alexander Sokolov, Alexander Chulok, Vladimir Mesropyan A couple of billion reasons why Africa is a priority for the futureby Christophe Pelletier, The Happy Future Group Consulting Ltd. News about the Future The Geneva Internet Platform More than 50% of global IG (Internet Governance) is conducted in Geneva. The Internet Governance Forum (IGF), the main IG umbrella body, is based in Geneva. Telecommunication issues are addressed by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). For online human rights, there is the UN Human Rights Council. The Geneva Internet Platform will add to this vibrant scene by bridging policy silos, strengthening the participation of small and developing countries, monitoring digital policies, and facilitating research for evidence-based IG Take part in UNESCO’s Comprehensive Study on Internet Topics UNESCO is seeking input from major stakeholders and experts for its study of Internet-related issues and future options within the UNESCO mandate. Responses are requested before 30 November 2014. Governments, private sector, civil society, academia, international organizations and the technical community are amongst those encouraged to respond. Recommended Book The Greening of Architecture: A Critical History and Survey of Contemporary Sustainable Architecture and Urban Designby Phillip James Tabb, A. Senem Deviren Contemporary architecture, and the culture it reflects dependent as it is on fossil fuels, has contributed to the cause and necessity of a burgeoning green process that emerged over the past half century. This text is the first to offer a comprehensive critical history and analysis of the greening of architecture through accumulative reduction of negative environmental effects caused by buildings, urban designs and settlements. Describing the progressive development of green architecture from 1960 to 2010, it illustrates how it is ever evolving and ameliorated through alterations in form, technology, materials and use and it examines different places worldwide that represent a diversity of cultural and climatic contexts. The book is divided into seven chapters: with an overview of the environmental issues and the nature of green architecture in response to them, followed by an historic perspective of the pioneering evolution of green technology and architectural integration over the past five decades, and finally, providing the intransigent and culturally pervasive current examples within a wide range of geographic territories. The greening of architecture is seen as an evolutionary process that is informed by significant world events, climate change, environmental theories, movements in architecture, technological innovations, and seminal works in architecture and planning throughout each decade over the past fifty years. This time period is bounded on one end by the awareness of environmental problems beginning in the 1960’s, the influential texts by Rachel Carson, E.F. Schumacher, Buckminster Fuller and Steward Brand, and the impact of the OPEC Oil Embargo of 1973, and on the other end the pervasiveness of the necessary greening of architecture that includes, systemic reforms in architectural and urban design, land use planning, transportation, agriculture, and energy production found in the 2000’s. The greening process moves from remediation to holistic models of architecture. Geographical landscapes give a global account of the greening process where some examples are parallel and sympathetic, and others are in clear contrast to one another with very individuated approaches. Certain events, like the Rio Summit in 1992 and Kyoto Protocol in 1997, and themes, such as the Hannover Principles in 2000, provide a dynamic ideological critique as well as a formal and technical discussion of the embodied and accumulative content of greening principles in architecture. What keeps energy leaders awake at night? World Energy Issues Monitor 2014by the World Energy CouncilIn times of unprecedented uncertainty for the energy sector, the pressure and challenge to further develop and transform the our systems to secure a sustainable energy future is immense. WEC’s Energy Leaders’ dialogue over the year 2013 has shown that with this outlook business as usual is not an option. The World Energy Issues Monitor 2014 helps to define the world energy agenda and its evolution over time. It provides a high-level perception of what constitute issues of critical uncertainty, in contrast to those that require immediate action or act as a developing signal for the future. As such, it has developed into an essential tool in understanding the complex and uncertain environment within which energy leaders must operate and a tool through which decision makers can challenge their own assumptions on the key drivers within the energy landscape. The 2014 edition is the culmination of a six-month study capturing the views of over 800 energy leaders including ministers, chief executives and the heads of the WEC’s national members committees covering 84 countries. The report, which highlights strong regional variations, looks at the global energy agenda and analyses the trends and outlook in six world regions plus 24 countries. Readers are encouraged to further explore the evolution of critical issues across years and in different regions and to download the results using the interactive issues monitor in the data section. Futurist Portrait: Jørgen Randers (born 1945) is a Norwegian academic, professor of climate strategy at the , and practitioner in the field of future studies. Jørgen Randers (born 1945) is professor of climate strategy at the BI Norwegian Business School, where he works on climate and energy issues, scenario analysis and system dynamics. He lectures widely at home and abroad on sustainable development issues – particularly climate change – for all types of corporate and non-corporate audiences. Jorgen Randers is non-executive member of several corporate boards in Norway, including the state owned Postal Service. He also sits on the sustainability council of The Dow Chemical Company in the US and (until recently) of British Telecom in the UK. He chaired the Commission on Low Greenhouse Gas Emissions who reported in 2006 to the Norwegian cabinet on how Norway can cut is climate gas emissions by two thirds by 2050. He was President of the Norwegian Business School BI 1981 – 89, and Deputy Director General of WWF International (World Wide Fund for Nature) in Switzerland 1994 – 99. He has authored a number of books and scientific papers, including co-authoring “The Limits to Growth” (1972) and its sequels in 1992 and 2004. He recently wrote “2052 – A Global Forecast for the Next Forty Years”. Jørgen Randers: Five recommendations for global action What could be done to avoid my sad forecast? Five recommendations stand out: 1) Slow population growthHave fewer children – especially in the rich world where each child has a high footprint. Concretely this means to reduce the tacit, pro-natalist attitudes which still dominate modern societies, both rich and poor. More fundamentally, it amounts to welcoming women who choose a career rather than more children. It amounts to agreeing that caring for a larger number of old people is not best solved through immigration, but through an increase in the pension age. It amounts to understanding that when the fraction of old increases, the fraction of young declines, so the total “support burden” of young and old divided by those aged 15-65 actually stays relatively constant throughout. The working age groups will have to care for the old – not in addition to, but instead of, caring for the young. 2) Reduce the ecological footprintEliminate greenhouse gas emissions from coal, oil and gas, first in the rich world The simplest approach would be to ban the use of coal, oil and gas in rich countries. One practical way would be to introduce a carbon tax of 100 euro per ton of CO2 emitted and a border tax adjustment to reduce carbon leakage. (This would roughly treble the price of coal-based electricity from 5 to 15 eurocents per kWh, and make it more expensive than many renewable energy sources.) But it is politically impossible to introduce a high carbon tax because voters resist the resulting jump in the energy bill in the short run. Thus reducing the footprint amounts to gaining public acceptance for a small sacrifice today in order to create a better life for our grandchildren. It amounts to making voters accept slightly higher living costs. It amounts to obtaining political support for deliberate slowing of consumption growth in order to give room for more growth in long term investment. 3) Help the poor with clean energyConstruct a modern low-carbon energy system in the poor world, paid for by the rich world. Concretely this means that the rich world would take the initiative, obtain agreement with the recipient countries, and pay for a climate-friendly energy system in the poor world. The energy system would be based on sustainable hydro, wind, solar and biomass resources, and most likely supplemented with carbon capture and storage retrofits on utilities burning fossil fuels. This energy system would both reduce climate emissions and suffering. At the more fundamental level this recommendation amounts to obtaining political support for a reorientation of existing funds for development assistance. 4) Temper short-termismEstablish supra-national institutions to help nations adopt policy that help our grandchildren. Concretely this means to delegate the authority to decide on certain matters to wise, quick and powerful entities which are beyond the day-to-day control of national parliaments and their voters. There is a good model in the central banks that exist in most civilized countries and decide on the size of the money supply without frequent democratic interference. A “Global Central Bank for Climate” authorized to decide on the maximum greenhouse gas emissions for each member nation, and providing advice (and preferably finance) to achieve the cuts, might do the trick. It could be built on the shoulders of the IPCC. At the deepest level, this proposal amounts to gaining acceptance in the population for the benefits of strong government in situations where a problem is better solved by a supernational institution than by market democracy. 5) Establish new goals for rich societyPursue increased well-being in a world without growth. Once beyond a certain threshold, increased income does not lead to increased well-being. At least when you haven’t anyone to compare with. But there is always the neighbour or friend who gets a raise and triggers your desire/need for higher income – irrespective of how rich you were in the first place. This vicious circle could be broken by banning future income raise, and concentrating social attention on increasing your well-being within the limitations of a fixed annual income. This shift from growth in income to growth in well-being will make even more sense in the future when per capita income will remain stable in spite of the rich countries continuing attempts to achieve growth. But I don’t think we will see democratic decisions to stop income growth. Slightly less improbable is a future decision to reduce the number of hours worked per year. A shorter work year could be sold as a gradual increase in the number of vacation days (replacing the gradual increase in wages). This would reduce income growth, and motivate for further focus on increased well-being – which is natural when people have more free time and less money. This amounts to convincing the majority of something that most middle and upper class people already know (but do not follow) namely that more money does not make you happier. Will the rich world follow these five recommendations? I don’t think so. At least not beyond the level assumed in the 2052 forecast. Capitalism and democracy will prevail more or less as is, and respond to global problems once they have occurred, not up front. And when responding, focus on what is cheapest in the short run. 2052-A GLOBAL FORECAST FOR THE NEXT FORTY YEARS Agenda Season Events 2013 / 2014 NEXT Event April 24, 2014the future of Women in BusinessLocation: Museum Geelvinck, Hinlopen Huis, Herengracht 518, 1017 CC Amsterdam Supported by the Amsterdam Economic Board. May 29, 2014the future of Green ArchitectureRetrofitting existing houses and historic buildings. Zero-energy buildings.Location: Museum Geelvinck Hinlopen Huis, Herengracht 518, 1017 CC Amsterdam A collaboration between Museum Geelvinck Hinlopen Huis and the Club of Amsterdam June 26, 2013the future of Transformation Special Supporters printable version
Content Scaling up inclusive innovation: asking the righ.t questions?May Event: the future of Green Architecture June Event: the future of Transformation News from the world of robots Ocean noise – the underestimated disruptive factorClub of Amsterdam blogNews about the FutureRecommended Book: Social Innovation: Solutions for a Sustainable FutureSocratic DesignFuturist Portrait: Jeremy Rifkin Agenda Special supporters Club of Amsterdam SearchSubmit your articleContactSubscribe Welcome to the Club of Amsterdam Journal. Join the Club of Amsterdam in May about the future of Green ArchitectureRetrofitting existing houses and historic buildings. Zero-energy buildings.Thursday, May 29, 2014, 18:30 – 21:15. and our June event about the future of Transformation, Thursday, June 26, 2014 “Transformation is everywhere. Due to changes in the economy, the climate, technology and lifestyle we are transforming our infrastructure, our houses, our companies our cities and ourselves all the time. This evening we will discuss the future of transformation. Big plans and top down is over, are we ready now for bottom up or are there other strategies to think of?” Felix F Bopp, Founder & Chairman Scaling up inclusive innovation: asking the right questions? by Adrian Smith, Senior Lecturer, SPRU – Science and Technology Policy Research, The Sussex Energy Group There has always existed an insistent undercurrent of grassroots innovation activity in societies. Whether born of material or economic necessity, or motivated by social issues marginalised by the conventional innovation systems of states and markets, networks of grassroots innovators have worked to find development solutions that meet the aims, interests, and situations of the activists, communities and individuals involved. Lessons from the grassroots?An emerging agenda for inclusive innovation amongst national and international development agencies has drawn elite attention to grassroots innovation. Grassroots innovation activity attracts interest as both a source of potentially inclusive ideas and practices, worthy of scaling-up, and as a relevant field of experience from which programmes for inclusive innovation might learn. Research into grassroots innovation movements at the STEPS Centre and in SPRU for over a decade certainly suggests some relevant lessons. But the most important lessons are not as directly instrumental for inclusive innovation as some agencies might hope. Because whilst there is valuable experience in grassroots innovations, the main lessons from studying this field is that questions about scaling-up inclusive innovation might be misguided, or at least too narrow, and what is really required are answers to questions about opening-up and democratising innovation systems. There are three motivating questions for the OECD Symposium. This contribution addresses the second and third of them: • What are the impacts of innovation and innovation policy on industrial, social and territorial inclusiveness?• How can inclusive innovation initiatives be expanded to improve welfare and facilitate the democratisation of innovation?• What are key implications for policy? What can be done to support the successful implementation of novel approaches to policy to effectively support inclusive growth? My argument is that inclusive innovation may not automatically facilitate the democratisation of innovation. Indeed, the relationship may need to operate the other way: it is difficult to have deep and meaningful inclusion in innovation (and, by implication, fair and just exclusion) without first democratising innovation systems. Problematising question two in this way means that considerations for policies sought in question three begin to look quite different. Scaling-up processes not objects?Even if one approaches grassroots innovation with an interest in scaling-up inclusive innovation, further questions soon become apparent. Evidence from our own research does include attempts to develop promising grassroots innovations into scalable forms. Typically, this proceeds through measures to formalise and commercialise the innovation. The facilities and tools of conventional innovation systems are brought to the services of promising grassroots innovators and their innovations: through the provision of research, development and demonstration; assistance with standards procedures; and help securing intellectual property. Investment and marketing assistance is also provided. Amongst the more advanced examples of this is the National Innovation Foundation in India. So one can analyse in-depth the processes for developing and marketing goods and services arising from grassroots ingenuity. Models could be developed for inclusive innovations relevant to markets lower down the pyramid. However, this is a view that relates grassroots innovation to inclusion in terms of outputs only. The grassroots furnishes prototypes for the poor; and these are then turned into goods and services for scaling-up, principally by expanding markets. It is also a view that presumes an obvious risk-taking innovator (analogous to a firm or inventor) to support and reward, and an innovation that can be turned into a proprietary object. Of course, the inclusive innovations that result need not be marketed commercially to poorer consumers. Inclusive innovations might become products that are distributed through donor development programmes or social enterprises. However, one of the key lessons from our research into grassroots innovation movements is that the people involved can be as much concerned about the processes of innovation as they are for the outputs of innovation. Grassroots innovators and their networks want to be involved in prioritising and framing the development issue, making design choices, decisions about evaluative criteria as well as evaluating ‘success’, undertaking further development and production, how investments are made, and any returns distributed or reinvested, as well as other aspects of the innovation process. Grassroots innovators are concerned about the form, depth, and scope of inclusion in innovation; and they are creating spaces for experimenting with new forms of innovation process. All of these are concerns that challenge the market-based approach to scaling-up inclusive innovation noted above. A good example here is experience with the Cisterna programme for rainwater harvesting in Brazil. Cisterna involves the provision of household and larger-scale rainwater collection systems that can store sufficient water for families to get through the dry seasons in semi-arid North-Eastern Brazil. The programme emerged originally as a grassroots innovation. Local activists and engineers pioneered an assisted process for households and communities to build their own systems. It proved to be an innovation popular with communities in the region. Wanting to scale-up the use of rainwater harvesting, the government decided to purchase ready-made, plastic systems for more rapid installation locally. However, these standard units did not work well in all situations – buckling under the intense heat in some cases. Just as significantly, simply installing this technology provided neither the space nor processes for development workers and local community members to address issues that affect how the systems would be used. Unlike the government view on scaling-up, the grassroots initiative was about more than providing families with water. There was a desire to address local power relations that affected not only access to water (and the injustices arising from reliance on water tanked in by vendors) but expand it to other development issues too. In its original form, Cisterna attempted through the organisation of the self-build process to build up capabilities for addressing social change, thereby giving people the confidence and power to organise themselves, articulate demands, do projects, and co-ordinate their maintenance. Protests in the region subsequently reinstated a self-build track into the programme. We found a similar difference in breadths of purpose in studying community energy projects in the UK. Again, the government has noticed grassroots activity and begun developing strategies and support schemes with a view to scaling-up initiatives. Again, however, the schemes are framed quite narrowly, this time around engaging publics in sustainable energy. Our research found the protagonists initiating community energy projects had a wider set of economic, social and political aims. These included building cohesion and solidarity in the community, enhancing the skills and employability of people, asserting ownership and democratic control over local renewable resources, local jobs and economic development, and becoming less reliant on centralised fossil energy. The aims were very context specific and varied project-by-project: contextual sensitivities that the scaling-up of standard community energy models or packages risks losing. At stake here are differences in framings of grassroots innovation. A more challenging framing sees grassroots innovation as providing a space for people to experiment, and in so doing build up power to do alternative developments in ways that challenge the structural priorities of incumbent innovation systems. An additional benefit to attending to inclusion in this way is that it opens up space to confront the gender, class, ethnicity, age and other relations that can sometimes be sources of exclusion, even in grassroots initiatives, and to figure out how an innovation process might be accompanied by other changes that ensure a more equitable and inclusive outcome. It has to be remembered that the communities within and across which grassroots innovation happens exhibit (and need to address) inequality, exclusions, and hierarchies just like the wider societies in which they are situated. Innovation: exclusions, resistance and alternativesScaling-up is often seen in terms of standardising. However, even where the process of standardisation is trying to result in more inclusive outcomes, the process can also exclude other original features. Organic food, for example, was an early grassroots example where organisations like the Soil Association developed standards principally to assure authenticity and help with scaling-up. But what expanded was a set of standard and specific practices for cultivating crops and livestock. Synthetics-free ingredients scaled-up and were inserted into conventional food systems, rather than the original organic movement vision for local food economies based in mixed farms. Insufficient inclusion of the organic food vision prompted a reaction, in the reappearance of more localised organic food provision through box schemes, markets, and so forth. Practices in agro-ecology represent innovations that resist the encroachment of agricultural innovations based in high-input, capital-intense, industrialising food production and consumption. It is difficult to foresee inclusion operating smoothly across these two different worlds of innovation. Other grassroots innovations arose similarly as ways of contesting the development pathways implied by incumbent innovation systems. As we see in areas of renewable energy now, such as for the Energiewende in Germany, once innovations grow beyond their grassroots origins, and concerns for ownership, empowerment and democratic control become more assertive, then they can present challenges to incumbent groups, and unsettle prevailing power relations. Sometimes, this leads to the co-option and reinvention of the innovation into forms more palatable to incumbents and their innovation systems. We get utility-scale renewable electricity plants rather than the decentralised electricity systems as envisaged by the pioneers under ownership of local communities. What could become inclusive innovation goes awry as the grassroots gets excluded through a scaling-up based in standardisation, loss of context and insufficient attention to power relations. Debating the democratisation of innovationSo perhaps scaling-up is the wrong question? Scaling-up tends to frame the issue as one of extent and quantity, which glosses over important points of contestation around directions and qualities of innovation. We need to think more carefully about different kinds of inclusions, various sources of exclusions, plural innovation pathways, and resistance and alternatives to incumbent systems. Moreover, we need to think about inclusion dynamically. Seeing inclusion in terms of correcting an exclusion and bringing (market) access to a service through an innovation, implies quite a settled view on innovation as providing fixes: the situation is ameliorated by a more inclusive provision of goods or service; the included passively welcome the innovation. However, as we see in the case of Cisterna, the intended beneficiaries might not be so pliant, they might demand more, or the innovation experience might reveal further points of contestation and generate new issues relevant to questions of inclusion and exclusion. The argument made here accords with the symposium identification with supporting the democratisation of innovation, but it suggests such democratisation will not arise automatically through a technical policy framing of the problem in scaling-up inclusive innovations. We need to think about democratising innovation in much more political terms. How might an agenda based around the democratisation of innovation differ from an inclusive innovation agenda? First and foremost, it would attend to the power relations involved in innovation: the power to do innovation, and power over innovation agendas. The discussion above about scaling-up involves power relations between the grassroots and innovation systems through the way grassroots novelties are selected and developed. Who is in control of these processes? What principles are in play over decisions and selections? Our research finds that grassroots innovators are interested in these questions. In a few cases, they articulate it as a question of democratising innovation, or practicing innovation for social justice. The symposium wants to identify key policy principles for innovation; perhaps they should be democracy and social justice? Drawing on grassroots debates, then a democratising innovation agenda would address the opening-up of innovation systems. Practically, that means thinking of more democratic arenas for establishing research agendas, funding decisions, universities, research institutes, venture and investment capital, training and skills programmes, prototyping infrastructures, marketing, and so forth. It also means building networks and coalitions between these arenas, where the potential can be demonstrated through acts, amplified by lobbying, and win influence through alliances. These are political challenges about opening-up innovation systems, and making systems accessible to citizens. The practical challenges are considerable and uncertain. One practical possibility arising from some grassroots initiatives suggests scaling–down innovation systems, and decentralising facilities and institutions to where people live. This has been attempted with science shops and technology networks in the past, for example, and is being explored through fablabs, hackerspaces and similar community-based workshops today. There are other practical steps that could be explored also, but there is not space to develop them here. Whatever gets considered, experience suggests we need to guard against idealizing grassroots activism in design, experimentation, and development of innovations. People do not respond automatically to the provision of a material facilities and training programmes. The spaces need be in tune with the contexts in which people live: they have to be designed and cultivated carefully, through on-going community development processes. And people have to be supported in gaining confidence within these more structured spaces. Questions of inclusion, exclusion, participation, and so forth are just as pertinent in these grassroots spaces. Issues abound around expertise, knowing how and knowing what, skills, tacit knowledge, and practices that push the scope and flexibility of both high- and low-technological options. The point is that these spaces allow experimentation and learning in democracy itself and what democratising innovation can mean practically. Some concluding remarksWords are powerful. They frame thinking and action. Clearly, inclusive innovation is a term motivating a lot of work amongst policy agencies at the moment (responsible innovation and social innovation are other terms keeping agencies busy). The term inclusive innovation provides welcome recognition that the focus and fruits of innovation need to be redirected and redistributed. But it also raises questions about what is being included in innovation. In this post I have tried to argue that we need to think about alternative terms, such as starting with democratising innovation systems. What might happen if the normative (yet not too threatening) goal of scaling-up inclusive innovation was replaced by aims to open-up innovation systems to more democratic processes? Grassroots innovation experience suggests this is a valid re-framing of the issue. Arguably, such an opening-up might lead to more diverse, balanced, and distributed innovation systems and economic activity. A wider sense of ownership and empowerment over innovative activity might encourage responsible citizens, whose deliberations could, as some democratic theory argues, generate richer discourses and better decisions about innovation. We’ll only learn whether this is the case or not if we ask the right questions. This post by is based on Dr Adrian Smith’s contribution to a session on ‘scaling up’ at the OECD Symposium on Innovation and Inclusive Growth in Paris on 20-21 March 2014. The article was originally written as a blog for the STEPS Centre website. May Event: the future of Green Architecture the future of Green ArchitectureRetrofitting existing houses and historic buildings. Zero-energy buildings.Location: Museum Geelvinck Hinlopen Huis, Herengracht 518, 1017 CC Amsterdam [this is not the regular museum entrance]The conference language is English.A collaboration between Geelvinck Museum Hinlopen Huis and the Club of Amsterdam. WithFenneken Anneveld-van Wesel, Independent Architecture & Planning ProfessionalWhy modern technique and sustainability are important for the preservation of historic buildings. Gijs Hoen, Project Leader, Stadsherstel AmsterdamMonumental buildings: possibilities for a sustainable future Paul de Ruiter, Architectenbureau Paul de Ruiter bvTowards a CO2-neutral society Mathias Lehner, founding partner, lehner guntherNEXTCity – Biodiversity Design leading to more Quality of Life for all Species Our Moderator is Tarik Yousif, Presenter at the Dutch public broadcaster NTR June Event: the future of Transformation the future of TransformationThursday, June 26, 2014Location: Cabral Gebouw, Cabralstraat 1, 1057 CD Amsterdam The event is supported by the Coop MidWest and the Andragologie Alumni Amsterdam.Transformation is everywhere. Due to changes in the economy, the climate, technology and lifestyle we are transforming our infrastructure, our houses, our companies our cities and ourselves all the time. This evening we will discuss the future of transformation. Big plans and top down is over, are we ready now for bottom up or are there other strategies to think of? WithEvert Verhagen, founder and owner, Creative CitiesTransformation in cities Karin Jironet, co-founder of In ClaritasThings change all the time, but sometimes, things will never be the same again. Louise van Schaik, Senior Research Fellow & Coordinator Global Issues, Governance and Diplomacy, The Clingendael InstituteThe politics of climate change Huseyin R Demirhisar, CIO, Managing Partner, Angel Wings VenturesThe Impact Investment Now! and our moderator Annegien Blokpoel, CEO, PerspeXo News from the world of robots Ultra-fast, the robotic arm catches objects on the fly Brain-controlled robot exhibited in Beijing Ocean noise – the underestimated disruptive factor Airgun signals disturb whales across great distances Airguns can disturb marine mammals at distances as far away as 2,000 kilometres says a new study by the Federal Environment Agency (UBA)and deteriorate both the physical and psychological well-being of the animals. Maria Krautzberger, President of UBA, said: “Noise pollution in the oceans is increasing and seems on course to continue, for one because of the expected exploration for natural resources in the world’s oceans. Airguns are a key factor in this context. Their sound bursts can severely impair the communication of blue and fin whales – in the worst case, across the entire distance of an ocean.” This would also occur if airguns were used for scientific purposes only. Airguns were developed to search the bottoms of the ocean for oil and gas stores. It is absolutely vital for whales to perceive their environment acoustically because they use their ears to “see”. If acoustic signals are masked, their “field of vision” is reduced and it can harm the biological fitness (physical and mental condition) of marine mammals such as the blue whale and fin whale. Nowadays man-made underwater noise is a virtually constant reality in all oceans. Shipping traffic is a source of chronic noise which has a high “masking potential”. Masking means an overlapping of sound signals. An intended signal of communication between marine mammals is covered up, or acoustically masked, by an interfering signal. Such interfering signals come from airguns which are used to explore the ocean floor. These signals are much louder and often much shorter than typical ship noise. It has long been suspected that these loud seismic signals can damage the hearing of marine mammals since these sound bursts can be 1,000 times louder than a ship. Underwater noise can also interfere with communication between marine mammals and their perception of other sounds in their environment. Whales depend on these signals, for example to find food or a mate. The new UBA study shows that airgun signals can have an impact at distances of up to at least 2,000 kilometres (km). This can affect animals living within the Antarctic Specially Protected Areas located south of 60° south, even airguns are in use on ships located north of 60° latitude. Airgun signals can evolve into intermittent noise with high masking potential already at medium distances of 500 to 1,000 km. At distances of over 1,000 km the airgun bursts can develop into continuous noise. This results in a loss of the natural communication distance of blue and fin whales in Antarctica, reducing it to about one per cent of its original range. The results of the UBA study show that masking effects and significant impact on the vocalisations of animals are possible across great distances and must be taken into consideration in the environmental impact assessment of impulsive sound sources like airguns. The model in this project will be further developed in a follow-up project which will enable applicability to other habitats. These habitats include the Arctic, which is expected to experience a lot of use of airguns to image the ocean floor for mineral resources and for research purposes. UBA’s President Maria Krautzberger said: “We must know exactly what the effects of sound waves from airguns are on marine mammals and take this into account in the environmental assessment of marine research. We therefore need an international noise action plan, perhaps in the framework of the Antarctic Treaty System.” The German Federal Ministry for Environment put into force a noise action plan for the North Sea on 1 December 2013. It enables the sustainable development of offshore wind power in Germany. The aim is to protect the native porpoise against noise, in particular when rearing its young. Noise is caused when foundation piles for wind turbines are driven into the seabed. AirgunsThe airguns used for underground exploration are essentially metal cylinders charged with high-pressure air which is then fired in bursts similar to an explosion. The burst creates an air bubble which generates a very short but very loud sound signal. Most of the acoustic signals emitted from airguns are in the low frequency range of up to 300 Hertz, making an overlap with the sounds and vocalisations of whales and seals probable. The baleen, blue and fin whale common to the Antarctic Sea communicate by and large in this frequency range. Further informationComplete report on UBA study Assessment of potential for masking in marine mammals of the Antarctic exposed to underwater sound from airguns Club of Amsterdam blog Club of Amsterdam bloghttp://clubofamsterdam.blogspot.com Socratic Designby Humberto Schwab, Philosopher, Owner, Humberto Schwab Filosofia SL, Director, Club of Amsterdam The Ukrainian Dilemma and the Bigger Pictureby Hardy F. Schloer, Owner, Schloer Consulting Group – SCG, Advisory Board of the Club of Amsterdam The impact of culture on educationby Huib Wursten, Senior Partner, itim International andCarel Jacobs is senior consultant/trainer for itim in The Netherlands, he is also Certification Agent for the Educational Sector of the Hofstede Centre. What more demand for meat means for the futureby Christophe Pelletier, The Happy Future Group Consulting Ltd. Inner peace and generosityby Elisabet Sahtouris, Holder of the Elisabet Sahtouris Chair in Living Economies, World Business Academy News about the Future Proterra Sets Record for Most Miles Traveled in a Day by a Battery-Electric Transit Bus A bus built by Proterra has set a record for the most miles traveled by a battery-electric bus in a day – traveling more than 700 miles in 24 hours. Equally impressive is the fact that on this trip the bus recorded an average fuel economy of nearly 27 miles per gallon – nearly six times that of a diesel Cultured meat: every village its own factory? Rising global demand for meat will result in increased environmental pollution, energy consumption, and animal suffering. Cultured meat, produced in an animal-cell cultivation process, is a technically feasible alternative lacking these disadvantages, provided that an animal-component-free growth medium can be developed. Small-scale production looks particularly promising, not only technologically but also for societal acceptance. “We believe that cultured meat is part of the future,” said Prof. Dr. Cor van der Weele of Wageningen University in The Netherlands. “Other parts of the future are partly substituting meat with vegetarian products, keeping fewer animals in better circumstances, perhaps eating insects, etc. This discussion is certainly part of the future in that it is part of the search for a ‘protein transition.’ It is highly effective in stimulating a growing awareness and discussion of the problems of meat production and consumption. Recommended Book Social Innovation: Solutions for a Sustainable Future (CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance)by Thomas Osburg (Editor), René Schmidpeter (Editor) Social Innovation is becoming an increasingly important topic in our global society. Those organizations which are able to develop business solutions to the most urgent social and ecological challenges will be the leading companies of tomorrow. Social Innovation not only creates value for society but will be a key driver for business success. Although the concept of Social Innovation is discussed globally the meaning and its impact on the development of new business strategies is still heavily on debate. This publication has the goal to give a comprehensive overview of different concepts in the very innovative field of Social Innovation, from a managerial as well as from a theoretical and social perspective. Over 30 leading thinkers in the field of Innovation, Strategic Management and Organizational Development give a well structured inside on the latest developments and progress in the field of Social Innovation. Thereby the authors not only develop a comprehensive and unique analysis on the state-of-the art of social innovation but also give practical advice and information to business leaders on how to apply the latest management thinking on Social Innovation to daily business decisions. This publication has the intention to become a milestone in the further development of the concept of Social Innovation as well as to further stimulate new business strategies necessary to overcome world most pressing social and ecological challenges. Socratic Design by Humberto SchwabPhilosopher, Owner, Humberto Schwab Filosofia SL, Director, Club of Amsterdam You can only design when you now from where, towards what and for what reasons. Socratic Design is a radical way of changing our paradigms, the way we think and the way we live. We need a radical approach because the soft, step by step, way does not bring us further. We are still heading full speed towards different crises. At the same time there is a lot of innovative intelligence, why are we so powerless? The simple answer is, because we are looking in the wrong corner and in the wrong way. It is not the world we have to change; we have to transform our way of thinking, acting and feeling. We are addicted to old ideas, old thoughts and old feelings. Our mind is not a free sweeping rational engine, nor is the world around us a fixed entity of stable facts. Both are deep fallacies. So if we innovate with our old mind still intact, we will just reproduce more of the same in a different format! You can dress it up but that does not change the content. Socratic Design is a program of awareness and of an action transformation for business, organizations and individuals. It makes us aware that everything around us (all that is touched by men), is designed. The world is designed according to assumptions, a world view and paradigms. In the Socratic practice we identify these and analyze them with scrutiny. In Socratic philosophy we have the tools to execute this analysis consequently and consistently. The objects, the buildings, and the very infrastructure of our society are based on assumptions. For example, the house is built on the assumption that we want to live privately, that we want to separate sleeping and eating, that we want to protect ourselves and our possessions with doors, locks, gates etc. Each of these assumptions leans on deeper assumptions. That we lock the doors, assumes that people will probably act as thieves, this assumes that people are selfish or ego oriented. The world around us is built on this assumption, all the design that surrounds us is suffused with this approach. All governmental programs will be based on the assumption that this is the true nature of man. In Socratic practice we can de-construct even the most hidden assumptions. An example is the assumption that all that is abstract has more truth than what is concrete and personal. The more something is distanced from you, the more objective it is. What you experience is just your opinion – what really is true is the generalization, abstracted from personal experience. Even small things like pencils, or chairs or clothes are designed and thus contain the same assumptions. Cultural fallacies (false assumptions) are stored away hidden in our things that surround us. But here comes the devil: the surroundings determine our inner way of thinking, conditioning our thoughts and our feelings. If you as a child, were to walk around in a school full of cameras, security doors, bullet proof glass and permanent monitoring, you would start to think, feel and act as a criminal. If you enter a hotel where they offer free drinking from the minibar as much as you like, most of us (not all) will feel very responsible and act moderately. If I approach pupils as managers of their learning process, giving them all the responsibility, they will act accordingly. So we are not independent, rational agents (cultural fallacy): we are dependent on the environment we design ourselves. How best then, to break out of this vicious circle of reproducing new thoughts that will only perpetuate old assumptions? Even more disturbing is the fact that we think that we are thinking, but most of the time we are rehearsing the same thoughts over and over again. It would be better to use the word “thought” as the past tense of “to think” instead of the present tense, because that is what we mostly do! The endorphin brain system gives us a release of nice “feeling”, when we have these same old thoughts over and over again. Thanks to this reward we get the impression that we really are thinking while the thoughts “run us”. Socratic Design establishes a sensitive environment to engage in “deep listening” by Socratic dialog. These Socratic dialogs transform us from ego and ratio oriented atoms into a collective sensitive mind that is capable of “listening” to the deepest human values and needs. This method guarantees a higher level of thinking. It frees us from the old addictive neuron-circuits, because each individual mind is “forced” to leave that behind. This sensitive collective organ is the producer of instantaneous wisdom, capable of creating genuinely real knowledge. This knowledge is concrete, personal and built on questions about our values, our authentic needs and on our vision of a good life. It is astonishing how many great minds, CEOs, leaders and politicians decrease their thinking quality-once they’ve reached their chosen field: they just retreat in to rehearsing admittedly very clever thoughts that got them there in the first place. It is not their fault; the top has to broadcast messages that fit in the paradigm of the organization. So we absorb, like the kid in the school, the narrative of the company, and begin to live in it in a subconscious way. The exciting thing about Socratic dialog is that we have to create knowledge each time again from scratch. Knowledge is the way we create the world around us every second. There are no facts; you see what you are focused on. So if we could start really thinking with these clever minds we would really be free of old “coal and steel” thoughts and get into “grafeen design”! Real thinking is the state-of-the-art creative process. As such, we should only design things and practices when we are at our sharpest that means when we are in this super collaborative state of practical wisdom. Socratic Design uses the deepest thoughts of the participants; they bear a lot of tacit knowledge, by making this explicit to the group, we leave procedures knowledge (which often does not match reality) behind and show what we really do; the teacher telling what teaching really is about, instead of using a didactic model, the furniture maker showing how to use the tools. Tacit knowledge contains values, practices, feelings that cannot be gathered by abstract information management or so called knowledge management! Socratic Design does two things: It gets people in a listening mode out of their own circular thoughts by strong moderation AND creates knowledge which starts from universal basic questions. At the end of the day everything boils down to the question “How do we want to live?” or “What is a good life?” A product, a service or an application is always related to this question (Undoubtedly, kids would answer the question about a good life: with the Lego game). For a company to create good stuff, the leader has to be a multiplier in creative thinking, enabling communication and freeing the company from bigotry and fear of leaving the comfort zone. We rigorously analyze the assumptions and narratives of a person or organization, we bring out tacit knowledge, and we create a landscape of values. Within this moral and aesthetic landscape, we design and fashion new assumptions and best practices into a new paradigm. Thanks to Socratic dialog, we can leave old assumptions and thoughts behind. This paradigm contains designed narratives about human beings and their lives. The vision or paradigms include new forms of language (words create our factual world), good organization based on narratives, strong procedures and continuous organized intelligence through dialog. We ourselves can design our lives ourselves towards our biggest goals from deepest human values. Futurist Portrait: Jeremy Rifkin Jeremy Rifkin is the bestselling author of twenty books on the impact of scientific and technological changes on the economy, the workforce, society, and the environment. His books have been translated into more than thirty five languages and are used in hundreds of universities, corporations and government agencies around the world. Mr. Rifkin is the founder and president of The Foundation on Economic Trends in Bethesda, MD. The Foundation examines the economic, environmental, social and cultural impacts of new technologies introduced into the global economy. Jeremy Rifkin has been an advisor to the European Union for the past decade. Mr. Rifkin also served as an adviser to President Nicolas Sarkozy of France, Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, Prime Minister Jose Socrates of Portugal, Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero of Spain, and Prime Minister Janez Janša of Slovenia, during their respective European Council Presidencies, on issues related to the economy, climate change, and energy security. He currently advises the European Commission, the European Parliament, and several EU and Asian heads of state. Mr. Rifkin is the principle architect of the European Union’s Third Industrial Revolution long-term economic sustainability plan to address the triple challenge of the global economic crisis, energy security, and climate change. The Third Industrial Revolution was formally endorsed by the European Parliament in 2007 and is now being implemented by various agencies within the European Commission as well as in the 27 member-states. Recent Books The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism. The Third Industrial Revolution: How Lateral Power Is Transforming Energy, the Economy, and the World The Empathic Civilization: The Race to Global Consciousness in a World in Crisis The European Dream: How Europe’s Vision of the Future Is Quietly Eclipsing the American Dream Quotes “Our way of life is likely to be more fundamentally transformed in the next few decades than in the previous 1,000 years. Food and fiber will likely be grown indoors in giant bacteria baths, partially eliminating the farmer and the soil for the first time in history. Animal and human cloning could be commonplace, with “replication” increasingly replacing “reproduction.” Millions of people could obtain a detailed genetic readout of themselves, allowing them to gaze into their own biological future and predict and plan their lives in ways never before possible. Parents may choose to have their children conceived in test-tubes and gestated in artificial wombs outside the human body. Genetic changes could be made in human fetuses to correct deadly diseases and disorders and enhance mood, behavior, intelligence and physical traits.” “We need to move beyond the delusion of retraining for a dwindling number of mass wage labor jobs, and begin to ponder the unthinkable – to prepare ourselves and our institutions for a world that is phasing out mass employment in the production and marketing of goods and services. Redefining the role of the individual in a near workerless society is likely to be the most pressing issue in the decades to come.” “Europe has become a giant laboratory for rethinking humanity’s future. In many respects, the European Dream is the mirror opposite of the American Dream. While the American Dream emphasizes economic growth and individual opportunity, the European Dream focuses more on sustainable development, and the quality of life. We Americans emphasize the work ethic. Europeans place more of a premium on balancing work and leisure. America has always seen itself as a great melting pot. Europeans, instead, prefer to preserve their rich multicultural diversity. We believe in maintaining a strong military presence in the world. Europeans, by contrast, emphasize economic cooperation and consensus over traditional geo-political approaches to foreign policy.” Jeremy Rifkin “The Zero Marginal Cost Society” Jeremy Rifkin on the Fall of Capitalism and the Internet of Things Agenda Season Events 2013 / 2014 NEXT Event May 29, 2014the future of Green ArchitectureRetrofitting existing houses and historic buildings. Zero-energy buildings.Location: Museum Geelvinck Hinlopen Huis, Herengracht 518, 1017 CC Amsterdam A collaboration between Museum Geelvinck Hinlopen Huis and the Club of Amsterdam June 26, 2014the future of TransformationLocation: Cabral Gebouw, Cabralstraat 1, 1057 CD Amsterdam (Near Mercatorplein)The event is supported by the Coop MidWest and the Andragologie Alumni Amsterdam. Special Supporters printable version
Content Daring for Big ImpactJune Event: the future of TransformationThe Future Show with Gerd LeonhardGlobal Entrepreneurship Summit GES 2014Club of Amsterdam blogNews about the FutureRecommended Book: Big Bang DisruptionHow to Survive and Thrive in the Age of DisruptionFuturist Portrait: Danielle NierenbergAgenda Special supporters Club of Amsterdam SearchSubmit your articleContactSubscribe Welcome to the ClubofAmsterdam Journal. Join the Club of Amsterdam in June event about the future of Transformation, Thursday, June 26, 2014 “Transformation is everywhere. Due to changes in the economy, the climate, technology and lifestyle we are transforming our infrastructure, our houses, our companies our cities and ourselves all the time. This evening we will discuss the future of transformation. Big plans and top down is over, are we ready now for bottom up or are there other strategies to think of?” Club of Amsterdam is a Knowledge Partner of the Global Entrepreneurship Summit GES 2014 Felix F Bopp, Founder & Chairman Daring for Big Impact by Maximilian Martin, Founder and Global Managing Director, Impact Economy SA Impressions from the 4th Impact Economy Symposium & RetreatThe 4th Impact Economy Symposium & Retreat that was held from June 13-15, 2014 on the shores of Lake Constance in Switzerland. The event annually convenes key influencers, thought leaders, and practitioners from the worlds of investment, business, government, and philanthropy in order to surface the most effective solutions, innovations, and opportunities that have surfaced in the promotion of impact. Global leaders of impact capitalism gathered last weekend to unpack the theme of Daring for Big Impact: Blending Inspiration, Innovation and Investment. Impact Economy-the global impact investing and strategy firm-tasked the group to work through five main topics that each have the potential to drive much wider, mutually enabling impact: using the power of storytelling and media to move global warming up on the agenda of the world; mainstreaming impact investing through market-building at the level of the G7 and concrete investments; using Corporate Impact Venturing to enable companies to innovate and upgrade corporate venture capital by investing for impact; redesigning global value chains to achieve a sustainable future, with a special focus on the future of the fashion industry; and exploring the country frontiers with exceptional potential, namely the EMICs (Ethiopia, Myanmar, Iran and Colombia), which Impact Economy Founder and Global Managing Director Dr. Maximilian Martin, who also moderated the event, has identified as a set of catalytic countries. The three-day journey was rounded out by the participation of two spiritual leaders, Han Shan and Swami Nitya, who reminded delegates that people are the true center of positive change, and that improving the state of the world through private initiative, business and investments remains an unlikely proposition if we are not ready to also work on ourselves to unleash our full human potential and give our very best. An exclusive viewing session was conducted on Impact Economy investee Years of Living Dangerously, a nine-episode television series on climate change that was produced by David Gelber, James Cameron, Arnold Schwarzenegger and stars Hollywood A-listers such as Jessica Alba, Harrison Ford, and Matt Damon. This documentary series brings to life the stakes in a country like Bangladesh, where a one meter sea level rise would flood 17 percent of the country, and what US president Barack Obama, who was interviewed for the series by New York Times columnist Tom Friedman intends to do about it, triggering an engaged discussion with executive and co-producers. Throughout, a rich, fast-paced program showcased the possibilities in terms of impact, and challenged participants to aim higher with their own pursuits. Some sessions were eye-opening. Dr. John Cheh, Vice Chairman and CEO at Esquel Group in China, demonstrated how an integrated textile and garment supply chain can achieve remarkable competitiveness as well as social and environmental performance. This presentation provided an aspirational example for Impact Economy’s work and ambition-setting for the industry as covered in the report Sustainable Apparel Value Chains, which shows that boosting total resource productivity, working conditions, and future-proofing profits need not be at odds with each other. In a world where impact investors sometimes focus on the single deal at the expense of a wider country perspective, the new set of countries presented by Impact Economy, namely the EMICs (Ethiopia, Myanmar, Iran, and Colombia) triggered great delegate interest: as high-stakes, high-opportunity countries, they allow impact investors to make a key difference in contributing to achieve inclusive growth. Speakers Ebrahim Afsah, Associate Professor of Public International Law at the Faculty of Law, University of Copenhagen; His Excellency Dr. Giulio Haas, Swiss Ambassador to the Islamic Republic of Iran; Khin Lay, Former Leader of Central Youth Wing of National League for Democracy in Myanmar; Frank W. Michel and Meseret Moges, Co-Founders, FriendsUnited Foundation, Ethiopia; and Philippe G. Nell, Minister and Head of the Americas Unit at the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs generously shared their deep insights into what smart investors should consider when aiming to invest for impact in the EMICs. As a pioneer in impact investing, Impact Economy shared additional pointers on how impact can be made investible. This presentation was followed by a fruitful discussion between representatives from the UK Cabinet Office, UBS and Novartis concerning what business and government are looking for, and can contribute, to further market building. The way in which the changing tectonics of value creation at the base of the pyramid, the rise of virtuous consumers, green growth and the circular economy are creating multitrillion-dollar markets and fueling a paradigm shift in the corporate world was another central topic, examined through the lens of Corporate Impact Venturing; a strategy that marries the worlds of corporate venture capital and impact. After three insight-packed days at a 450-year old Swiss castle, complemented by power networking and time for reflection, the delegates adjourned on Sunday-enthusiastic to bring fresh ideas and connections to bear in their pursuits starting on Monday morning, thus blending inspiration, innovation and investment. Impact Economy is an impact investment and strategy firm based in Lausanne, Switzerland, with overseas operations in North and South America out of New York and Buenos Aires. Working with professional investors and companies, the firm’s mission is Making Impact Investible. June Event: the future of Transformation the future of TransformationThursday, June 26, 2014Location: Cabral Gebouw, Cabralstraat 1, 1057 CD Amsterdam (Near Mercatorplein)The event is supported by the Coop MidWest and the Andragologie Alumni Amsterdam. Transformation is everywhere. Due to changes in the economy, the climate, technology and lifestyle we are transforming our infrastructure, our houses, our companies our cities and ourselves all the time. This evening we will discuss the future of transformation. Big plans and top down is over, are we ready now for bottom up or are there other strategies to think of? WithEvert Verhagen, founder and owner, Creative CitiesTransformation in cities Karin Jironet, co-founder of In ClaritasThings change all the time, but sometimes, things will never be the same again. Louise van Schaik, Senior Research Fellow & Coordinator Global Issues, Governance and Diplomacy, The Clingendael InstituteThe politics of climate change Huseyin R Demirhisar, CIO, Managing Partner, Angel Wings VenturesThe Impact Investment Now! and our moderator Annegien Blokpoel, CEO, PerspeXo The Future Show with Gerd Leonhard Overview and introduction Technology and the world that we are living in is changing exponentially and most of the time its hard to keep up especially for those who arent experts, geeks or early adopters. Its for this reason that Futurist Gerd Leonhard created this new web-TV show which aims to present and explain the most pressing issues and exciting future trends to the general public whether theyre savvy consumers, worried parents or curious professionals and business influencers. Every TFS episode is hosted by Gerd and will deliver easily digestible insights in a critical, yet engaging and exciting way. TFSs goal is to show how technologys exponential advancements will radically alter and re-design the way in which we experience the world and interact with each other in the immediate and longer term future. TFS episodes are between 4-7 minutes in length and cover topics that are timely and relevant, impactful and of strong interest to the general public as well as to the global business community. Themes include: Privacy Failure, Human-Machine Futures, The Future of Jobs, Digital Obesity, Sustainable Capitalism, Big Data and many more. Episode 1: Privacy Failure Is privacy really dead? Would a world without anonymity really be desirable? Should we simply accept that our communications, opinions, images, movements and actions are 99% public by default? Will wearable computing devices such as Google Glass, medical self-monitoring devices and smart watches and the rise of the Internet of Things (IoT) make it even harder to adhere to some kind of privacy standard? Will we really live in world where everything that happens must be known (read Dave Eggers book The Circle)? TFS host and creator Gerd Leonhard believes that in a world where almost everything is watched, recorded and analysed, and where information spreads like wildfire, we urgently need to strike a personal balance between openness and transparency and a collective standard of privacy, and frequently review our data-sharing paradigms to avoid entering into truly Faustian bargains. Allowing for mistakes and imperfections is what makes us human, but how would still uphold this concept if we are being monitored and quantified all the time? Episode 2: Knowledge and Learning The perceived value of data, basic information and fact-based human knowledge is becoming increasingly commoditised by the efficiency and sheer horse-power of digital technologies. Any Internet user can now look up, find out and tap into almost any information, anywhere, anytime and very soon, artificial intelligence and so-called cognitive computing will become as normal as sending an SMS. The traditional education paradigm of just-in-case learning is being challenged by the just-in-time learning approach that the Internet seems to afford. As a result, human ingenuity and intuition (knowing without knowing), creativity, social or emotional intelligence and a new kind of wisdom will matter increasingly. Are we moving on from the industrial/information age and its left-brain emphasis to a kind of right-brain renaissance, and will we see a new triumph of creativity, storytelling and imagination? Or will machines and software eat our world and turn us into useless wetware? What skills do we need to teach ourselves or our children so that they can he happy and prosper 5-10 years from now? How will they be successful in those jobs that havent even been invented yet? What will happen to educational institutions, schools, colleges and universities, and will degrees and certificates still be as valuable as they are today? If learning is a lifelong flow and in-demand instead of just-in-case, how will our educational systems evolve? Episode 3: Work and Jobs In the future, most repetitive or machine-like tasks and jobs will be largely offloaded to ultra-smart software and intelligent machines, wether in the manufacturing, financial services, government, transportation or technology sectors. By 2025, up to 45% of jobs might be automated-away in many sectors making a redefinition of work and jobs an urgent priority for governments, industry and educators alike. Gerd believes that the trend away from the jobs-that-robots-can-and-will-do will also free us up to re-focus on those tasks that only us humans can do. Skills or character traits such as creativity, pattern recognition, imagination and storytelling will once again become increasingly important as machines are not yet suited to tackle them, at least in the foreseeable future. As an example, whereas travel agents used to spent the majority of their time searching databases for hotels and flights in the past, they are now focusing on putting highly-tailored travel packages together and offering personalised advice the basic database of flights and hotels is available to everyone, now. This trend towards the right brain will of course pose significant challenges to those who were used to doing pure human computing tasks such as statistics and data analysis, or that were employed in mostly repetitive manufacturing environments. In the future, we are very likely to see what Gerd calls workupation and quite possibly a lot more debate on the concept of the guaranteed minimum income in response to rampant technological unemployment Global Entrepreneurship Summit Club of Amsterdam is a Knowledge Partner of theGlobal Entrepreneurship Summit GES 2014October 10-11, 2014, Bangalore, Indiahttp://www.ges2014.com Global Entrepreneurship Summit is a global platform to share experience, learning & innovations in entrepreneurship & exploring the global opportunities. GES is the World’s largest entrepreneurship summit specially focused on global business scenario, emerging startups, women entrepreneurship, youth entrepreneurship, global brand creation, innovations in entrepreneurship & many more interactive sessions by renowned top leading industrialists, global business leaders, policy makers, entrepreneurs, investors, innovators, chairman, CEO & MD of reputed organizations across the globe will gather and share their experiences. Club of Amsterdam blog Club of Amsterdam bloghttp://clubofamsterdam.blogspot.com Socratic Designby Humberto Schwab, Philosopher, Owner, Humberto Schwab Filosofia SL, Director, Club of Amsterdam The Ukrainian Dilemma and the Bigger Pictureby Hardy F. Schloer, Owner, Schloer Consulting Group – SCG, Advisory Board of the Club of Amsterdam The impact of culture on educationby Huib Wursten, Senior Partner, itim International andCarel Jacobs is senior consultant/trainer for itim in The Netherlands, he is also Certification Agent for the Educational Sector of the Hofstede Centre. What more demand for meat means for the futureby Christophe Pelletier, The Happy Future Group Consulting Ltd. Inner peace and generosityby Elisabet Sahtouris, Holder of the Elisabet Sahtouris Chair in Living Economies, World Business Academy News about the Future. Future of Government Smart ToolboxThe Future of Government Smart Toolbox demonstrates how technology can enhance government performance by strengthening efforts to reduce corruption and bureaucracy and enhance political representation, service delivery, trust, leadership, security and innovation. The report highlights successful state practices from around the globe in the digital era. Report by the World Economic Forum. Manipulating and Detecting Ultrahigh Frequency Sound Waves Berkeley Lab researchers have demonstrated a technique for detecting and controlling ultrahigh frequency sound waves at the nanometer scale. This represents an advance towards next generation ultrasonic imaging with potentially 1,000 times higher resolution than todays medical ultrasounds. – Recommended Book Big Bang Disruption: Strategy in the Age of Devastating Innovationby Larry Downes and Paul Nunes Consumer electronics and computer makers have long struggled in a world of exponential technology improvements and short product life spans. But until recently, hotels, taxi services, doctors, and energy companies had little to fear from the information revolution. Those days are gone forever. Software-based products are replacing physical goods. And every service provider must compete with cloud-based tools that offer customers a better way to interact. Today, start-ups with minimal experience and no capital can unravel your strategy before you even begin to grasp whats happening. Never mind the innovators dilemmathis is the innovators disaster. And its happening in nearly every industry. Worse, Big Bang Disruptors may not even see you as competition. They dont share your approach to customer service, and theyre not sizing up your product line to offer better prices. You may simply be collateral damage in their efforts to win completely different markets. The good news is that any business can master the strategy of the start-ups. Larry Downes and Paul Nunes analyze the origins, economics, and anatomy of Big Bang Disruption. They identify four key stages of the new innovation life cycle, helping you spot potential disruptors in time. And they offer twelve rules for defending your markets, launching disruptors of your own, and getting out while theres still time. Based on extensive research by the Accenture Institute for High Performance and in-depth interviews with entrepreneurs, investors, and executives from more than thirty industries, Big Bang Disruption will arm you with strategies and insights to thrive in this brave new world. How to Survive and Thrive in the Age of Disruption Top 12 Insights from Communicasia 2014 By Madanmohan Rao The annual Communicasia conference and expo in Singapore always turns out to be a good time to take stock of local and global telecom changes, network with industry, discover new startups, check out the latest gadgets and gizmos, and party late into the night! Parallel tracks cover mobile, broadcast media and enterprise IT. One key theme which seems to run across many tracks this year is disruption: identifying, understanding, surviving and leading exponential upheavals. Here are my Top 12 takeaways from the speakers discussions and insights on dealing with digital disruption. 1. Understand the scale and speed of disruption In digital media space, the market value of the Top 15 Internet and OTT (over the top) players is larger than that of the Top 100 publicly-traded telcos. And most of these Internet and OTT companies did not even exist 10 years ago, such as Facebook, Tencent, Baidu, Naspers, Salesforce.com, Twitter and LinkedIn. In just a decade, these new entrants have been able to create as much market value as incumbents did over a century. It is not just this kind of scale that was unthinkable, but even the qualitative aspects of digital life that seemed like science fiction just a couple of decades ago such as Internet of Things and smart cities. 2. Denial is not the answerTrying to block new disruptors is not the answer: learn how to work with them. Many telcos tried to block services like Skype and WhatsApp, but that is not the solution. Just because voice and SMS revenues are declining does not mean denial of OTT or submission to them is the only option. More progressive solutions would be AT&Ts deal with Pandora for mobile music streaming, Verizon with Skype, 3 Hong Kong with WhatsApp and KDDI with Line in Japan. 3. Startup alliances are a road to innovation and scaleStartups need partners like telcos for scale, and telcos need startups and grassroots developers for their innovation energy. For example, startup Evernote tied up with NTT DoCoMo for funding and market scale in Japan; it tied up with StarHub to expand in the Singapore market. It has a fulltime team of 15 people to manage alliances with telcos around the world. SingTel bought three startups in an acqui-hire arrangement, including HungryGoWhere (restaurant booking app). In other domains, governments are sharing their information assets with industry via Open Data models to help spur local Big Data ecosystems. 4. Use crowdfunding to validate new ideasPlace a mix of a few large bets and many small bets to see which would succeed in or disrupt the market. Test new ideas through crowdfunding to validate them as well as raise funds. Singapore telco Starhub runs a crowdfunding initiative called Crowdtivate for emerging startups, with mentorship and regional outreach programs. Angel investors themselves are turning to crowdfunding sites to identify new bets and learn from the market. 5. Tap social media across the entire purchase cycle Social media along with mobile are giving consumers even more power than before, disrupting the older power equation of brands. It is not just in pre-purchase research or post sales stages that consumers are sharing their brand experiences but at every single touch point including receiving the first bill, filing complaints and resolving technical issues. Brands should understand the consumer conversation at each of these stages. 6. Listen to customers and co-innovate with themOTT players and startups are mastering the art of innovating along with customer needs, in lean and agile models. Feedback is continually solicited from customers at every stage, giving them a powerful disruptive edge. In contrast, telcos make it very hard for consumers to talk to their representatives and show little interest in learning from them even though, ironically, consumers want to help telcos provide better services. A few operators do try to learn from consumer complaints, such as O2, which is even using British humour in some of its customer response tweets. China Telecom is tapping its consumers for ideas and getting hundreds of them. 7. Dont underestimate ecosystem challengesTen years ago, some industry players claimed that NFC (near field communication) would disrupt the payment world. They are still saying that. The ecosystem challenges in the digital acceptance network have been complex readers, handsets, consumer friendly security procedures, and so on. Digital wallets are still in transition phase, but will eventually take off, eg. MasterPass, Google Wallet. There will finally be ease of offline/online payment and delivery in omnichannel e-commerce across any device, including ones such as Google Glass. 8. Rethink old mediaThe broadcast era of spectrum allocation is not set in stone. There are new frequencies available for satellite Internet, such as TV Whitespace. They can open up new frontiers in bridging the digital divide in rural areas, and change the previous equations of access and distribution. Disruption is coming here too who would ever have thought that Google and Facebook would one day get into the Internet access business via atmospheric balloons and drones? 9. Develop an Asia strategyAsia is on the move. The rise of Japan and South Korea disrupted the world order in the second half of the previous century, followed by the rise of China and India. They are not just large markets but launchpads of new global tech and media players, and are re-drawing hardware, software and services maps. Now other Asian countries are on the move: Indonesia and Vietnam, followed by Myanmar. IBMs 2014 Telecom Consumer Survey across 35 countries showed that Asian consumers expect to spend more on mobile services in the next few years, whereas much of Europe is in an economic downturn and its consumers want to cut down mobile expenses. What is your Asia strategy? 10. Progressive governments can make a differenceSmart city initiatives with Internet of Things and connected devices are being launched in cities around the world, from Amsterdam to Barcelona and the city-state of Singapore is also aiming to become a smart nation by 2025. Its Smart Nation Platform (SNP) will allow government agencies and industry to connect, collaborate and comprehend the new kinds of services that can be incubated and scaled up for mass markets in healthcare, transportation, recreation and the like. Emerging markets which dont have a Silicon Valley-like ecosystem will need government support for incubators, eg. Indonesia. 11. Prediction is hard but you must tryTech dominance in one era is no guarantee of understanding and succeeding in the next. Almost 20 years ago, Bill Gates wrote a book called The Road Ahead, talking about the emerging opportunities for Microsoft which dominated the PC era. Today it seems to have missed leadership positions in the mobile and cloud era. Google led the world in Web-based search, but new players are outflanking it in performance-based search, including psychographic models. 12. Dont forget analogueMuch as we are infatuated and habituated with digital media, there is still a large segment of society which is in a predominantly analogue world. Creative approaches like notice boards carrying information from cybercafés will continue to bring alerts and resources to rural communities but ultimately they too will be disrupted by digital. In sum, dealing with disruption requires a range of strategies to engage emerging disruptors and existing consumers. Culture change is tough, and a company or country may miss one wave of paradigm shift but can regroup to catch the next wave if it is nimble and savvy enough (see my review of the excellent book Big Bang Disruption by Larry Downes and Paul Nunes and my interview with the authors). At a larger societal level, fundamental notions of data privacy, ownership and usage are being disrupted, and will require new kinds of interpretation and enforcement. Welcome to the Brave New Digital World! Madanmohan Rao is research director at YourStory Media and editor of five book series (http://amzn.to/NpHAoE). His interests include creativity, innovation, knowledge management, and digital media. Madan is also a DJ and writer on world music and jazz. He is in the Board of Advisors of the Club of Amsterdam. He can be followed on Twitter at @MadanRao. The original article can be found here. Futurist Portrait: Danielle Nierenberg Danielle Nierenberg is President of Food Tank: The Food Think Tank and an expert on sustainable agriculture and food issues. She recently spent two years traveling to more than 35 countries across sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, and Latin America meeting with farmers and farmers groups, scientists and researchers, policymakers and government leaders, students and academics, and journalists collecting their thoughts on whats working to help alleviate hunger and poverty, while also protecting the environment. She has spoken at major conferences and events all over the world and her knowledge of global agriculture issues has been cited widely in more than 3,000 major publications including The New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, USA Today, the International Herald Tribune, The Washington Post, BBC, the Guardian (UK), and other major publications. Danielle served as the Director of the Food and Agriculture program at the Worldwatch Institute. She also worked for two years as a Peace Corps volunteer in the Dominican Republic. Danielle Nierenberg: “Our food system is broken. Some people dont have enough food, while others are eating too much. Theres only one way to fix this problemand it starts with you and me. Food Tank is for the 7 billion people who have to eat every day. We will offer solutions and environmentally sustainable ways of alleviating hunger, obesity, and poverty by creating a network of connections and information for all of us to consume and share. Food Tank is for farmers and producers, policy makers and government leaders, researchers and scientists, academics and journalists, and the funding and donor communities to collaborate on providing sustainable solutions for our most pressing environmental and social problems. As much as we need new thinking on global food system issues, we also need new doing. Around the world, people and organizations have developed innovative, on-the-ground solutions to the most pressing issues in food and agriculture. Through years of field visits (and years of trying to eat better in her own community) our President Danielle Nierenberg has helped to highlight and promote these best practices. Today, we hope to bridge the domestic and global food issues by highlighting how hunger, obesity, climate change, unemployment, and other problems can be solved by more research and investment in sustainable agriculture. Food Tank will highlight hope and success in agriculture. We will feature innovative ideas that are already working on the ground, in cities, in kitchens, in fields and in laboratories. These innovations need more attention, more research, and ultimately more funding to be replicated and scaled-up. And that is where we need you. We all need to work together to find solutions that nourish ourselves and protect the planet.” “We need a food system where science is our servant–NOT our master!” Agenda Season Events 2013 / 2014 June 26, 2014the future of TransformationLocation: Cabral Gebouw, Cabralstraat 1, 1057 CD Amsterdam (Near Mercatorplein)The event is supported by the Coop MidWest and the Andragologie Alumni Amsterdam. Knowledge PartnerClub of Amsterdam is a Knowledge Partner of theGlobal Entrepreneurship Summit GES 2014October 10-11, 2014, Bangalore, India Special Supporters printable version
Content Colombia’s Path to ProsperityThe Future Now Show October Event: the future of Historic Pianos Transformation, Liminality and ChangeClub of Amsterdam blogNews about the FutureRecommended Book: Flash Foresight: How to See the Invisible and Do the Impossible Climate change adaptation can help promote sub-Saharan African livelihoodsNeuromorphic ‘atomic-switch’ networks function like synapses in the brainFuturist Portrait: Riel Miller Agenda Special supporters Club of Amsterdam SearchSubmit your articleContactSubscribe Welcome to the Club of Amsterdam Journal. The Club of Amsterdam launches The Future Now Show starting in September! and join our special event in Amsterdam – Monday, 13 October about the future of Historic Pianos Felix F Bopp, Founder & Chairman Colombia’s Path to Prosperity by Philippe G. Nell, Minister, Head of Americas Unit, State Secretary for Economic Affairs, Bern, Switzerland1 President Manuel Santos has been reelected on June 15, 2014 for a second four-year term as President of Colombia. During his first presidency, he has provided new orientations to his country which is now at several crossroads. On the political side, the government negotiates with the Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia (FARC) a peace agreement. Peace is long due and would unleash significant investments in departments strongly affected by the conflict and open new perspectives for their population. The negotiations face however great challenges and the most difficult issues remain to be settled. On the economic side, fundamentals have been strong for years and Colombia has started its accession process to the OECD with the progressive adaptation of rules in several areas. In order to close significant gaps with OECD members, major efforts will be necessary to improve competitiveness, to diversify the economy and to reduce informality, poverty, inequality and corruption. The objective of this article is twofold: first, show why Colombia is on the path to prosperity; and second, highlight some of the most important challenges to achieve the status of a developed country. 1. Colombia at a GlanceColombia has very interesting characteristics. The population of 47 million is young, eager to learn, to work and to improve living standards. Significant natural resources play a key role in the economy. Its location is unique in South America with ports on two oceans. Second in the world for biodiversity, Colombia offers a great potential in terms of commercial applications of natural products. The size of the country is impressive, twice Texas and three times California. Huge parts are yet to be developed. For 2014, economic growth should reach 5%. Colombia has become Latin America’s third largest economy and has overtaken Argentina which is undergoing a very deep crisis. According to the Finance Minister, Mauricio Cárdenas, an ambitious road-building program using private investment will add an extra point to growth in the next four years. Moreover, a peace agreement with the FARC, ending an insurgency of half a century, would contribute an additional point. 2. Economic PolicyColombia has pursued a rigorous monetary and fiscal policy for years and never had to reschedule any foreign public debt. Even during the world recession of 2009, growth was positive (1.7%). Since 2000, except for 2002-2004 and 2007-2008, inflation has remained modest. For the coming years, the perspectives are encouraging for growth, inflation and public debt. Colombia implements a 2011 structural fiscal law and a medium-term fiscal plan with a framework for deficit and debt reduction to 2025. Ambitious fiscal targets and primary fiscal surpluses of 2% and above as of 2016 should be achieved; this will require a new tax reform to increase revenue and reduce evasion. Growth in expenditure will be driven by transfers to victims of the armed conflict and subsidies to address social needs, as well as higher spending on energy, road and housing infrastructure. The debt/GDP ratio of 41.7% (2013) should decrease to 37.5% by 2018. Colombia has a sustainable foreign debt burden and should maintain a current account deficit of 3.3% of GDP during the 2014-2018 period to be financed with substantial foreign direct investment inflows focused primarily on energy, infrastructure and communications. Foreign investment has strongly increased, moving from a yearly average of USD 2.5 bn (1994-2002) to USD 6.9 bn (2003-2010) to reach a new record in 2013 with close to USD 17 bn, that is more than 3% of GDP. These inflows complement domestic savings, contribute to higher productivity and production and strengthen the international reserves position. The steady increase of the investment/GDP ratio from 14.5% in 2000 to 28.4% in 2012 has been the basis for economic growth. 3. Rating Agencies: Investment GradeColombia’s sound position has been recognized by credit-rating agencies. In 2012, Standard & Poor’s, Fitch Ratings and Moody’s lifted Colombia’s sovereign debt rating to investment grade, coinciding with excellent economic and financial conditions. This reflected a reduction in vulnerability to external shocks, the historic fulfillment of debt obligations, confidence in the country’s macroeconomic policy and a tangible improvement in security. 4. Foreign Economic PolicyColombia is a member of the Andean Community and of several other Latin American integration schemes. In 2011, President Alan Garcia of Peru initiated in Lima the Pacific Alliance with Chile, Colombia and Mexico. The objectives are twofold: first, deepen integration with the creation of a single market including the free movement of goods, services, capital and people. Second, define common actions to promote trade links with the Asia Pacific Region. Over the years, Colombia has also set up a wide network of bilateral investment2 and double taxation agreements3. Preferential trade relations were established with the European Union, Switzerland and its EFTA partners, Israel, Korea, the United States, Canada and most Latin American countries; negotiations are presently under way with Japan and Turkey. China has become the second source of imports after the United States and represents a formidable competitor for some local industries; between 2000 and 2013, its share in Colombia’s imports has grown from 3% to 17.4%. International trade openness4 has increased from 24.9% in 2000 to 31.4% in 2012 but remains much smaller than its partners of the Pacific Alliance5; Colombia protects sectors such as dairy, meat and automobiles. Trade must be further enhanced and the potential of free trade agreements (FTAs) fully exploited. To this effect, the government has recently established a center to promote the effective use of FTAs. In order to increase agro-based exports, major work is necessary to address the sanitary and phyto-sanitary requirements of developed countries. After Mexico (1994) and Chile (2010), Colombia aims to become the third Latin American country joining the OECD. This illustrates the willingness to undertake a wide range of domestic reforms to adopt OECD codes – liberalisation of capital movements and current invisible operations, corporate conduct, corporate governance, … – and guidelines thereby increasing the international competitiveness of the country. 5. Economic Issues: Export Dependence on CommoditiesSince 2004, exports have grown substantially mainly due to a strong increase of commodity prices. Export concentration has also strengthened over the years. In 1991, 15 products made up 62.2% of exports; in 2012, only five products accounted for 68.1%. In 2001, commodities and commodities-based products made up 74% of exports, and in 2012, 87%. The share of manufactured products in GDP is low and has been declining from 14.4% in 1996 to 11.3% in 2013. Why did manufacturing not keep up with the economy which grew at about 4% per year? a) The exchange rate of the peso adjusted by inflation differential with Colombia’s major trading partners has appreciated by 41.7% during the past 10 years. As a consequence, manufacturing has been facing growing difficulties to compete on foreign markets and internally against imports.b) Venezuela has fallen from second export market (16% share, 2008) to seventh (3.8%, 2013). Major disruptions in trade flows have affected Colombia’s manufacturing sector.c) Some sectors are excessively protected. A shrinking manufacturing sector in GDP terms cannot boost job creation; nor does mining (8.5% of GDP), agriculture and fishing (6.9%), or electricity, water, gas (3.6%). This implies that the majority of the work force (60 to 70%) operates in the informal sector, is mainly self-employed, active i.a. in services (69.5% of GDP), and lives in very modest conditions. 6. Business Environment: Improved PerformanceStarting in 2005 and with greater emphasis from 2007 onward, the Colombian government has improved the regulatory environment by strengthening policies and institutions with the aim of increasing productivity, accelerating economic growth, and promoting competitiveness. During the last eight years, Colombia gained 30 ranks in the World Bank Doing Business classification to hold a position ahead of all Latin American countries except Chile and Peru (same ranking) (Figure 1). The difference with Argentina, Brasil, Ecuador and Venezuela is very significant. Twenty-five programs were implemented with the objective to facilitate entrepreneurship. The most important improvements were in the areas of firms creation, paying taxes and protection of investors. The focus of the reforms was the reduction in transaction costs, for instance through the creation of one-stop-shop systems for starting a business, registering property and trading across borders. Electronic data interchange systems were developed to file and pay national taxes, duties and social security contributions. In December 2012, the government passed reforms lowering the cost to hire workers and modifying the general royalty system to stimulate investments and regional development. 7. Doing business: Selected CriteriaColombia fares fairly well for starting a business, paying taxes and construction permits. Its performance is weak for enforcing contracts due to the judicial system and for the cost of importing a container due to local infrastructure (Table 1). It is more expensive to move a container from a Colombian Pacific harbor to Bogota than from China to Colombia. 8. InfrastructureAverage investment in transportation infrastructure in Colombia increased from 0.62% of GDP (2008-2010) to 1.14% (2011-2013). Colombia has a weak ranking in Latin America for roads, railroads, ports and airports due to geography and incomplete road infrastructure. For transportation costs, the country ranks 130 out of 148 in the WEF classification. The government plans to invest 3% of GDP (1% public; 2% concessions) and looks for public-private partnerships to fund its National Development Plan. Huge projects are under way and envisaged. Investments of USD 55 bn are foreseen by 2021 including: Roads: USD 47 bn, 47 projects, construction and rehabilitation of 8,000 km of roads during the coming 5 years. Railroads: 1,154 km, concessions; projects have recently been awarded by tenders. Rivers: 800 km for maintenance of Rio Magdalena. Ports and airports: several projects are under way. 9. Other Issues6 Education: while 87% of the children get a primary school education, the number drops to 71% for secondary school. Colombia ranks very low internationally in the PISA ranking (the assessment of 15-year-old students’ proficiency in reading, mathematics and science…but still better than Brazil, Argentina and Peru) and the PIRLS test (10-year old, reading). Three universities get 50% of the public funds, reflecting a very high concentration. Overall, the level of English is low and there is a lack of specialists in technical fields such as software. Major efforts were made during the past ten years to increase technical education with significant results registered by SENA (Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje). Innovation: 60% of the firms in manufacturing and 68% in services do not innovate. Invention is much more developed in Brazil, Mexico and Chile with coefficients 7.6, 4.5 and 1.3 times larger than in Colombia. R&D: resources allocated to R&D remain modest at 0.2% of GDP and are much smaller than in Brazil (1.2%) and in the OECD countries (2.4%). Justice: there is a lack of mechanisms to enforce contracts and apply rules and a significant backlog of cases. Various measures were taken to address this, including the compilation of an inventory of the various types of cases in cooperation with the World Bank. The judicial system must also be modernized. A strategic plan is under way to deal with electronic processes, information and judicial training. Energy costs: they are higher than in the USA and Peru. Corruption: it is a significant problem in both the public and private sector. In 2013, Colombia’s ranking (129) was lower than Brazil (133) but higher than Peru (111), Mexico (105), Panama (85) or Chile (23)7. In the public sector, the perception of corruption is highest for political parties and Congress (4.3 on a scale up to 5), public officials (4), the judicial system, health services (3.8) and the police (3.7). Transparency norms are not met by several departments. In the private sector, corruption is mostly present with payments to facilitate and accelerate procedures. The costs for society are very high in terms of misallocation of resources which should instead be devoted to education, health and infrastructure. The cost of doing business is higher and foreign investors are affected. There is a need to develop a culture of prevention. Various measures are being taken including the adoption of the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions and the establishment of the Transparency Secretariat in charge of designing a public anti-corruption policy and to coordinate public entities. 10. Political Issues: Peace ProcessNegotiations with the FARC are under way under a six-point program; three parts are concluded: a) Comprehensive agrarian development policy: aims at transforming the conditions in the countryside and reversing the effects of violence. It is necessary to close a big gap between the urban and the rural worlds with programs providing a boost to farmers’ living conditions; the government is aware that violence has flourished there due to extreme poverty, lack of opportunities and weakness of institutions to regulate public life. b) Political participation of the FARC: the objective is to break forever the link between political activity and weapons and reestablish a basic rule of society: “that nobody uses weapons to promote his political ideas and that nobody that promotes his political ideas be victim of violence8“. The essence of any peace process is to facilitate the transformation of an armed group into a political movement in a democratic environment. To succeed, the whole population – farmers, indigens, Afro-Descendants, business people, scholars, social organisers, members of the church – must feel part of the same system. It will be essential that the central, regional and local authorities work together to build an harmonious and cohesive society. Consensus has been reached on: rights and guarantees in general for the exercise of political opposition; democratic mechanisms for citizen participation; effective measures to promote wider political participation at national, regional and local level from all sectors of society, including the most vulnerable and with security guarantees. c) Solution of issues related to illicit drugs: the agreement covers first comprehensive development plans including community participation in the design, execution and evaluation of the substitution and environmental recovery programs for the areas affected by illicit crops; second, drug use prevention and public health programs; and, third, measures against narcotics production and commercialization. The three pending issues refer to a) ending the warfare, disarming the guerrillas and punishments; b) rights of the victims; and, c) implementation, verification and endorsement of the peace agreement. The negotiations must deal with the reincorporation of the guerrillas into society. It is not enough to demobilize them. Land restitution must also be addressed: it is a basic element of justice during a transition. The government has launched an ambitious plan which will be more effective if the land is being given back under the framework of development programs. Difficult questions include: to whom should the land be distributed? To the victims, to the farmers without land or to the ex-guerrillas? Any agreement with the FARC will be submitted to the Colombian population for approval. Colombia has witnessed a significant improvement in security matters during the past years. The current peace process opens the possibility for a new era. The obstacles are nevertheless significant: corruption, clientelism, networks of interest and organized crime threaten a transition. Conclusion Colombia is a high middle-income emerging economy with strong macro-economic fundamentals and a significant potential. China’s competition, the dependence on commodities and competitiveness represent significant challenges. The major tasks ahead refer to diversifying the economy to break the vicious circles of poverty, violence and insecurity and to bringing the internal conflict to an end: a virtuous circle benefitting the whole society would then ensue. 1 This article is based on a presentation at the 4th Impact Economy Symposium & Retreat held at Greifenstein Castle located in Thal, Switzerland, June 13-15 2014. The author sincerely thanks Beatriz Londoño Soto, Ambassador of the Republic of Colombia in Bern and Bernardo Romero Calderon for valuable information on Colombia. The views expressed are exclusively the author’s.2 In force: Canada, Chile, China, El Salvador, Honduras, Guatemala, India, Liechtenstein, Mexico, Peru, Spain, Switzerland, United States. In negotiation: Azerbaijan, Israel, Kuwait, Panama, Russia, Turkey, Quatar, Uruguay.3 In force: Bolivia, Canada, Chile, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru, Spain, Switzerland. In negotiation: Belgium, France, Germany, Japan, Netherlands, United States.4 Ratio of imports and exports to GDP.5 Mexico (61.7%), Chile (58.8%), Peru (47.1%)6 Consejo Privado de Competitividad, Informe Nacional de Competitividad 2013-2014, Bogota, 2013.7 WEF, Global Competitiveness Report, Geneva, 2013.8 Sergio Jaramillo, La Paz territorial, Speech, Harvard University, March 13, 2014. S. Jaramillo is Presidential Commissioner for Peace, negotiator in the current peace process with the FARC. The Future Now Show – Launch in September 2014 Shape the future now, where near-future impact counts and visions and strategies for preferred futures start. Do we rise above global challenges? Or do we succumb to them? The Future Now Show explores how we can shape our future now – where near-future impact counts. We showcase strategies and solutions that create futures that work. Every month, for 15 minutes, we roam through current events, discoveries, and challenges – sparking discussion about the connection between today and the futures we’re making – and what we need, from strategy to vision – to make the best ones. The Future Now Show features October Event: the future of Historic Pianos the future of Historic PianosMonday, October 13, 2014Location: Museum Geelvinck Hinlopen Huis, Herengracht 518, 1017 CC Amsterdam [this is not the regular museum entrance]The conference language is English.A collaboration between Geelvinck Museum Hinlopen Huis and the Club of Amsterdam and supported by PerspeXo. WithAnnegien Blokpoel, CEO, PerspeXo, Co-ModeratorThe Club of Amsterdam in 2014 & 2015 Jurn Buisman, The Sweelinck CollectionGöran Grahn, orgel, fortepiano, clavecimbelGiovanni di Stefano, Curator of Musical Instruments, Rijksmuseum Amsterdam Panel Richard Egarr, Conservatorium AmsterdamDick Verel, Museum of musical instruments Vosbergen, Eelde and more .. Transformation, Liminality and Change by Colette Kavanagh, Ph.D., Cultural Psychologist. The world as we know it is ending. There are changes in the economy, the climate, technology and lifestyle with globalization, technology and the internet accelerating this process. The evolution of societies worldwide is dependent upon the ability to generate new ideas, transform infrastructures, design new cities, services, products, organizations and companies. We need an in-depth understanding of the concept of liminality while also creating new systems of education and transforming ourselves. Transformation and change are nothing new. Since the beginning of history indigenous societies were faced with the necessity to evolve, and those who failed to do so did not survive. However, the exaltation of scientific and technological reasoning has had its price and all around us we see its negative effects. In these times of spiritual, social, and economic breakdown, Western society is no longer equipped to deal with the disruption of liminality, nor able to integrate the tools for renewal. It is difficult for us to incorporate transient realities and transformational movements, and to navigate ourselves through the crucial liminal phase of transition. Liminality is…“an interlude or limen when the past is momentarily negated and the future has not yet begun. It is a period of “fertile chaos” when everything is uncertain, yet one of pure potentiality where the mystery of possibility invites us to explore that which is wanting to emerge” – Colette Kavanagh The word “liminal” comes from the Latin limen. It refers to “the threshold, or the initial stage of a process” (Oxford English Dictionary 8: 964). The World Book Dictionary defines liminal as “the threshold of perception” (2: 1214). However, it is not one threshold or turning point but two. Liminality is the passage between the two thresholds where one “story” or experience ends and a new one begins. In simplistic terms, the first threshold to be crossed is leaving the “old story” or pre-liminal phase. For example, a period in one’s personal life, a job, a marriage, or a company’s way of being in the world may need to come to an end. However, without successfully navigating one’s way through the liminal passage where transformation takes place, one cannot hope to successfully enter the post-liminal phase or “new story” with any degree of success. Transformation and change are not the same dynamic and need to be understood separately. Change frequently involves outer adaptations to a new experience. For example, a company may re-design its logo, modernize its image, uniforms, technology, the interior of their premises or even appoint new leaders. However, the change is results focused and usually involves a shift in the external situations based upon somebody’s perception of a problem. Change is much easier for people to accept than transformation. Transformation is the inner psychological process that people need to go through to come to terms with change. It involves the three-phase process mentioned above and may not be accompanied by short-term productivity. Therefore modern culture sees the liminal phase of transition as failure. It tries to quickly by-pass it especially when it is accompanied with a great deal of resistence and the outcome is uncertain. However, the greater the change the more attention needs to be given to this liminal phase of transition. Liminality can best be described as “fertile chaos,” a storehouse of creative possibilities striving after new forms and structure, or a gestation process. It is what goes on in nature in the fertilized egg, in the chrysalis, and even more richly and complexly in it’s cultural homologues. Liminality is the seedbeds of cultural creativity, an abyss of pure potential: a no-man’s land betwixt and between the structural past and the structural future. Liminality is vital to the maturation of any culture, society, organization, religion or company that wishes to serve the deepest needs of its people. Society is open-ended and is constantly re-generating itself. At socially significant moments in time, between fixed cultural categories, when elements of structural organization are temporarily removed or rearranged, cultural creation takes place. In liminality, the individual may suffer a loss of identity. The previous social status may no longer be effective, yet the new identity role has not yet manifested. This transitional phase is disorientating because it involves significant changes in the dominant self. Individuals will be at different stages of transformation along the change curve and the emotional response to change needs to be recognised. Leaders of change also need to consider their own process of transition. In the liminal or transitional phase of the transformational process, one enters an in-between space or time where creativity is at its most intense. It is a state where new values, behaviours, social dynamics and functions or structures are emerging and coordinated. It is vitally important that this phase is not completed too quickly. The necessity to adapt to market dynamics and pressure for innovation requires individuals and corporations to continuously transform themselves. However, the process of transformation takes time, and if the liminal phase is not given its due space the positive effects of transition will be lost. Colette Kavanagh, Ph.D., lives in Amsterdam. She is a Cultural Psychologist who lectures internationally and has spent the past twenty years specializing in transformation, liminality and change. When Pope Benedict unexpectedly resigned in 2013, the Catholic world was thrown into a state of chaos and liminality. If a pope could resign, future popes could, perhaps, be forced to resign!! At that moment, the University of California invited Colette to speak for half an hour on their radio station to discuss this historical transition and what it might involve for Roman Catholics worldwide. Club of Amsterdam blog Club of Amsterdam bloghttp://clubofamsterdam.blogspot.com Socratic Designby Humberto Schwab, Philosopher, Owner, Humberto Schwab Filosofia SL, Director, Club of Amsterdam The Ukrainian Dilemma and the Bigger Pictureby Hardy F. Schloer, Owner, Schloer Consulting Group – SCG, Advisory Board of the Club of Amsterdam The impact of culture on educationby Huib Wursten, Senior Partner, itim International andCarel Jacobs is senior consultant/trainer for itim in The Netherlands, he is also Certification Agent for the Educational Sector of the Hofstede Centre. What more demand for meat means for the futureby Christophe Pelletier, The Happy Future Group Consulting Ltd. Inner peace and generosityby Elisabet Sahtouris, Holder of the Elisabet Sahtouris Chair in Living Economies, World Business Academy News about the Future Nanotechnology for multifunctional roads For Germany an increase in heavy traffic volume of about 40% within the next 15 years is predicted. Under these circumstances it is desirable to have construction methods both for durable and noise reducing road pavements. Nano-optimized concrete is a suitable material for this purpose. In the research project of the Federal Ministry of Education and Research nanooptimized ultra high performance concrete is developed for multifunctional roads. Ultra high performance concrete (UHPC) is durable, robust, bearing and fine-grained. Thus it is appropriate for realizing specially designed low noise road surface textures achieving pass-by level reductions up to 5 dB and at the same time providing good grip. In a joint project with nine partners these textures were to be produced in road surfaces made from UHPC. The main tasks included adapting the composition of the UHPC to the purposes of site mixing and texturing, adapting the predefined texture and the texturing method to the specific characteristics of UHPC, reducing the energy consumption required for producing the UHPC-compound by 40 % compared to standard UHPC-mixes. Appropriate mixing and construction technologies for on site construction in UHPC were developed. Bottling Up Sound Waves Berkeley Lab researchers have developed a technique for generating acoustic bottles in open air that can bend the paths of sound waves along prescribed convex trajectories. These self-bending bottle beams hold promise for ultrasonic imaging and therapy, and for acoustic cloaking, levitation and particle manipulation. “We need to find ways to bend acoustic wave fields without depending on the use of a highly engineered medium,” says Xiang Zhang, director of Berkeley Lab’s Materials Sciences Division. “With our bottle beam technique, we can design and synthesize acoustic bottles that are capable of directing sound waves along paths of desired curvature through homogeneous space without the need of metamaterials or any other highly engineered medium.” “Our technique offers a new degree of freedom for controlling the flow of acoustic energy at will.” “These giant acoustic traps could lead to new technologies and devices for a variety of applications in chemistry, materials, as well as biosciences,” he says. “For example, by creating this three-dimensional bottle-like acoustic trap, we could use it as a micro-chemical reactor and manipulation of biological trafficking devices.” Recommended Book Flash Foresight: How to See the Invisible and Do the Impossibleby Daniel Burrus (Author), John David Mann (Contributor)Flash Foresight offers seven radical principles you need to transform your business today. From internationally renowned technology forecaster Daniel Burrus – a leading consultant to Google, Proctor & Gamble, IBM, and many other Fortune 500 firms – with John David Mann, co-author of the Wall Street Journal bestseller The Go-Giver, comes this systematic, easy-to-implement method for identifying new business opportunities and solving difficult problems in the twenty-first century marketplace. Climate change adaptation can help promote sub-Saharan African livelihoods A UN report. Investing in ways to adapt to climate change will promote the livelihood of 65 per cent of Africans, the United Nations environmental agency reported, warning also that failing to address the phenomenon could reverse decades of development progress on the continent. Africa’s population is set to double to 2 billion by 2050, the majority of whom will continue to depend on agriculture to make a living, according to the UN Environment Programme (UNEP). “With 94 per cent of agriculture dependent on rainfall, the future impacts of climate change – including increased droughts, flooding, and seal-level rise – may reduce crop yields in some parts of Africa by 15 – 20 per cent,” UN Under-Secretary-General and UNEP Executive Director Achim Steiner said. “Such a scenario, if unaddressed, could have grave implications for Africa’s most vulnerable states,” he added. In a new graphical report, Keeping Track of Adaptation Actions in Africa (KTAA) – Targeted Fiscal Stimulus Actions Making a Difference [pdf], UNEP details the implications of climate change, and provides examples of adaptation projects that range from forest ecosystem management to aquatics and agriculture. The report describes sustainable examples of how countries in sub-Saharan Africa enhanced environmental and ecosystem resilience through the use of native plants and natural infrastructure, land plans and rainwater harvesting, among other examples. The projects are integrated into national development policies which can strengthen and enhance the resilience communities against the impacts of climate change, while also contributing to the realization of the anti-poverty targets known as the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), according to the report authors. “By integrating climate change adaptation strategies in national development policies Governments can provide transitional pathways to green growth and protect and improve the livelihoods of hundreds of millions of Africans,” Mr. Steiner noted. The projects also highlight the urgency to act now in adapting to challenges, especially in developing countries where capabilities to respond to the magnitude of the problem are limited. This year’s Africa Environment Day, marked annually on 3 March, focused on combating desertification on the continent and enhancing its agriculture and food security. The continent has lost 65 per cent of its agricultural land since 1950 due to land degradation, according to figures cited by UNEP. Up to 12 per cent of its agricultural gross domestic product (GDP) is lost due to deteriorating conditions and 135 million people are at risk of having to move from their land by 2020 due to desertification. Neuromorphic ‘atomic-switch’ networks function like synapses in the brain International Center for Materials Nanoarchitectonics (MANA): While modern computers have revolutionized information processing, the mammalian brain continues to reign supreme in tasks such as recognizing sounds or objects, reading handwriting, or predicting where food may be found based on both memory and environmental clues. This contrast in performance stems from the radically divergent physical structures and operating mechanisms of neuronal networks and digital circuits. Computers employ a microprocessor to rapidly perform simple, error-free calculations in a sequential fashion and store data in physically separate memory banks. In contrast, the brain comprises a vast network of neurons serving simultaneously as both information processors and memory units, resulting in comparatively slow and imprecise operations in a parallel or distributed manner. Most efforts to mimic brain function involve programming computers to create virtual neural networks. However, researchers at the California NanoSystems Institute (CNSI) at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) and the International Center for Materials Nanoarchitectonics (MANA) at the National Institute for Materials Science, Japan are developing a neuromorphic device designed to incorporate structural aspects inspired by the cortical neuropil and produce the class of operational properties which underlie cognition in the mammalian brain. The atomic switch, a recently developed nanoscale circuit element, has been shown to possess synapse-like properties in a purely inorganic device. Using a nanoarchitectonic approach, millions of atomic switch elements are incorporated into a densely interconnected network of silver nanowires. These atomic switch networks (ASN) retain the synaptic properties of their of individual component elements and generate emergent behaviors comprised of their distributed, collective interactions. Such emergent behaviors are a principal characteristic of biological neural networks and many other complex systems. Ongoing studies involve the utilization of these emergent behaviors for information processing toward the generation of a new class of cognitive technologies. A look inside the ASN device reveals its highly interconnected architecture which comprises synaptic circuit elements at each point of contact between nanowires. The collective interactions between these atomic switches result in unique, emergent properties which have shown significant potential for neuromorphic computing. Futurist Portrait: Riel Miller Riel Miller, head of Foresight at UNESCO For thirty years Riel has been co-creating innovation, leadership and transformation in both the public and private sectors around the world. He is one of the world’s leading strategic foresight designers and practitioners. Currently Riel holds the position of Head of Foresight at UNESCO in Paris. Previously he has worked as a senior manager in the Ontario public service (Ministries of Finance; Universities; and Industry) and for some thirteen years in total at the OECD in Paris (Directorates of Economics; Science & Technology; Education; Territorial Development; Development Centre; International Futures Programme). In 2005 he founded an independent consultancy – xperidox (which means knowledge through experience) to advise clients on how to use the future more effectively . Since 1988, when he managed his first major participatory foresight exercise (Vision 2000), Riel has designed over fifty applied futures projects around the world, large and small scale, public and private. He is an accomplished and innovative designer of processes for using the future to make decisions in the present. Quote`[…] Open learning and closed learning can generate similar capabilities – a better understanding of knowledge creation and acquisition. While closed learning emphasizes internalization of existing knowledge and the development of pre-defined skills and competences, open learning emphasizes the process of learning itself. Open learning occurs in social networks where learners gain and construct new knowledge and capabilities. It is often self-directed and problem-oriented. It is self-motivated, grounded in the learner’s personal context, and often it leads to very rapid competence development. The learning-to-learn that can augment closed learning and vice-versa. […]` – Promethean Thinking Deeper Research Paper No.2 – Introduction and Overview – Riel Miller Interview of Riel Miller by Sirkka Heinonen on Creativity and Futures Design2011 Agenda Watch The Future Now Show! Season Events 2014 / 2015October 13, 2014the future of Historic PianosLocation: Museum Geelvinck Hinlopen Huis, Herengracht 518, 1017 CC AmsterdamThis is a collaboration between Museum Geelvinck Hinlopen Huis and the Club of Amsterdam. UKJanuary 28, 2015the future of Collective IntelligenceLocation: The Cube, Stdio 5, 155 Commercial Street, London E1 6BJThis is a collaboration between The Cube and the Club of Amsterdam. Special Supporters printable version
Content Europe’s Rare Earth dependence on China – Future PerspectivesThe Future Now Show Energy InnovationClub of Amsterdam blogNews about the FutureRecommended Book: The Future of Continental Philosophy of Religion The Asian Square Dance – 1st partISIS and Western intelligence role in the Middle EastFuturist Portrait: Geci Karuri-Sebina Agenda Special supporters Club of Amsterdam SearchSubmit your articleContactSubscribe Welcome to the ClubofAmsterdam Journal. The first shows are online – with topics like climate change, food,social revolution, 3-D printing and medicine, marketing made meaningful, balanced communities and … The Future Now Show Felix F Bopp, Founder & Chairman Europe’s Rare Earth dependence on China – Future Perspectives by Patrick CrehanCEO and Founder, Crehan, Kusano & AssociatesDirector, Club of Amsterdam Rare Earth Elements (REEs) form a group of 17 metals which play a very important role in modern industry, especially in the clean-tech and electronic sectors. Despite their name they are not really all that rare. However they are costly to extract, and sites from which their extraction makes commercial sense are relatively few and far between. First discovered in Sweden in the late 1700s, they now play a very important role in modern industry as essential ingredients in: Energy Efficient Electrical Motors: A modern car can contain 60 electrical motors, doing all manner of things from adjusting the seats and the side-view mirrors to winding the windows up and down, controlling the air-conditioning and driving the windscreen wipers. REEs allow manufacturers to reduce their size and weight, while improving their energy efficiency. Modern electrical appliances for use at work or around the home try to be smaller and lighter cutting down on transport costs, while doing the same or better work using less energy. Wind Turbines and Hybrid Electric Cars: The generators of modern wind turbines contain many Tonnes of rare-earth metals. The turbine pictured below is produced by a Finnish company called Switch. Capable of generating 2.5MW, its permanent magnet is an alloy of neodymium and weighs 2000kg. About 30% of this by weight is REE. Speakers and Microphones: For example the small powerful energy efficient ones used in modern mobile phones. Other Uses: Disc drives, flat panel displays, the “phosphor” of traditional TVs and fluorescent light bulbs, new high efficiency light bulbs based on CFL and LED technologies, catalytic converters. The picture below shows an example of a turbine for production of wind-energy. This particular model is produced by a Finish company called Switch. It has an output of up to 3.5MW and employs a permanent magnet containing 2,000 kg of REE alloy. Modern mobile phones use small but essential quantities of REEs. Making the iPhone for example requires 9 different REEs in the screen and to polish the glass of the screen, in the microphone and vibration unit, as well as in its electronic circuitry. The following able was developed by CNET journalist Mark Hobbes. It is easy to see why the demand for REES has developed very rapidly in the last few decades and is likely to continue to increase in future. In 1990 China produced 27% of REEs and related minerals. By 2009, global production was of the order of 132,000 Tonnes of which China produced 129,000 Tonnes equal to almost 98% of global production. According to Wikipedia we are now in the “Chinese Era” of REE production. Things started to get tense however in about 2009 when China announced a plan to reduce exports of REES to 35,000 Tonnes per annum over the period 2010-2015, ostensibly to conserve scarce natural resources and protect the environment. This was followed up by a series of revisions of this policy, which in each case amounted to further limits on the export of REEs, including a total ban on exports to countries like Japan. The result was market chaos as prices rose out of control for a while and a number of REE consumers bought up reserves in a panic to ensure suppliers. This began a period of trade tension between China and other countries including Japan, the US and Europe. Cases brought against China at the WTO, have ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and China is currently in the process of appealing the judgments. In fairness, China is not only the biggest producers of REEs, it is also the biggest consumer. Demand for REEs has grown as fast in China as it has elsewhere. China also had very real concerns about the environmental damage and public health impact of illegal mining activities that had grown up in response to burgeoning domestic and international demand. According to a recent report published on the website of Rare Earth Investing News, 40% of magnetic REE mining supply in China is illegal. These activities are often mom-and-pop affairs described by one of the exports at the EIAS as an opportunistic situation where someone digs a whole in the ground, fills it full of sulphuric acid, waits a while, then scoops up a part of what is produced for further processing, before moving on to dig another hole without much care for the overall consequences on the environment, local water resources or the health of workers involved. Other commentators such as The Economist have pointed out that export restrictions apply only to the raw materials and not to intermediate or finished goods. They observe that this is a very good strategy to help Chinese manufacturers move up the value chain, by “forcing” foreign manufacturers to outsource or relocate at least some of their manufacturing tasks to China. The case of General Motors moving its magnetic research facilities to China in 2006 has been put forward as evidence in support of this hypothesis. The last word has not yet been printed on the WTO case against China. No doubt it will generate headlines in the months and years to come. One of the main messages of the EIAS meeting was that the demand for REES has actually fallen since the crisis. One of the reasons put forward is that many who were in the market for REES are not permanently out because they have found other ways for doing what they did with REEs. Apparently this substitution effect has happened to some extent across all domains of application of REEs. It is possible also to imagine a natural fall-off in demand due to the global crisis that has reduced spending by individuals and by governments. Renewable energy policies for example should be seen as major drivers of demand for REEs based products. Another big driver should be overall global population growth. It seems that there is room to continue the conversation started at the EIAS and develop scenarios based on realistic assumptions about the impact of global growth, energy, environment and climate change policies on future demand for REEs. Another major message coming out of the meeting seemed to be that nervousness concerning sources of REEs may be overblown. A representative of Molycorp, a major US producer of REEs based at Mountain Pass in California, pointed out that the Chinese share of production has fallen a long way from the highs of 2009 and 2010 and is now at about 82%, far from the 95% or 97% often quoted in the press. It seems many new sites are coming on line. Molycorp itself has made very important investments in its production facilities. To thoroughly re-invent and modernize its system of production based on in California it has had to obtain more than 500 permits. According to its representative, its new facilities are exemplars of industrial and environmental good practice, allowing it to produce at prices that are competitive with respect to China. Things look calm and stable for now and the pressure causes by Chinese limits on production and export is much lower for now. However the questions remain as to how long this might remain and what impact will growth and progressive policies in emerging economies have on demand and the adequacy of available supplies. In the case of Japan, its reaction to the crisis of 2009-2011 includes initiatives to look into other sources of REEs, for example on the sea-bed. Already interesting prospects for commercially viable under sea sources of REEs seem to have emerged in the regions close to Japan. This indicates that the full range of possible sources of commercially viable REEs has not at all been fully explored. Another reaction in Japan has been to look at the opportunities presented by recycling. Electronic waste is a rich source of REEs through recycling. Unused electronic goods in Japan alone are estimated to contain of the order of 300,000 Tonnes of REEs. Several industrial initiatives have been set up to tap into this opportunity. The extraction of metals from land-fill or urban waste is often referred to as “urban mining.” In the case of e-waste in Europe however it is problematic. E-waste is often classified as hazardous due to the presence of metals and other components that are ultimately seen as harmful to health or the environment, and therefore subject to strict controls in terms of handling and disposal. For this reason e-waste is often wrongly classified as “used goods” and exported without treatment. In this way large quantities of strategically important minerals that could in principle be recovered and recycled are exported from Europe to landfill sites in far-away places such as Africa. One of the “incentives” for doing this seems to be the relatively high cost of recycling of e-waste. In actual fact many exciting and highly effective technologies now exist based on closed-loop chemical processes that enable the recovery of REEs in industry friendly forms, as useful oxides, alloys and mixtures. At the EIAS meeting a German company called Loser Chemie gave an excellent overview of what is nowadays possible. To be really effective these techniques need to be combined with sorting strategies that are “aware” of the REE content of e-waste. A more transparent and liquid market for REEs extracted in this way would help. According to the CTO of Loser Chemie, not even 1% of the potential for recycling REEs in Europe is currently being exploited. It seems that there are many entrepreneurial opportunities for those with the knowledge and vision to make the leap. It would be nice to have a better grasp of the size of the opportunity that represents for Europe. Maybe this is a good question for someone else to take up as a way of building upon the debate started by this initiative of the EIAS. The final question is to ask “how did we end up in this position of crisis in 2010” to start with. According to an online MIT resource dealing with The Future of Strategic Natural Resources, the entire world is still in danger of a resource crisis. Since the 1960s, China developed a strong mineral policy that was in line with its own growth needs, its natural advantage in terms of high quality deposits and low labor costs, while the rest of the world sat by and allowed itself to become dependent on a single country to meet the majority of its needs. Our last though is what ne3ds to be done to avoid this kind of situation ever arising again. 14 October 2014, the EIAS (European Institute for Asian Studies) organized a briefing seminar on “Europe’s Rare Earth dependence on China – Future Perspectives”. The Future Now Show Shape the future now, where near-future impact counts and visions and strategies for preferred futures start. Do we rise above global challenges? Or do we succumb to them? The Future Now Show explores how we can shape our future now – where near-future impact counts. We showcase strategies and solutions that create futures that work. Every month we roam through current events, discoveries, and challenges – sparking discussion about the connection between today and the futures we’re making – and what we need, from strategy to vision – to make the best ones. The Future Now Show October 2014about 3-D printing and medicine, marketing made meaningful, balanced communities and … FeaturingLise Voldeng, CEO & Chief Creative Officer, Ultra-Agent Industries Inc.Mylena de Pierremont, Board Member, World Future SocietyPatrick Crehan, CEO and Founder, Crehan, Kusano & AssociatesMarkus Petz, Head of Special Projects & Development, Experience Alternative Tampere 3-D printing services are popping up everywhere, but, given their low scalability, where will their biggest impact be? Patrick Crehan reckons that it will be in printing living things. Not whole beasts but organs, from skin (already available) to hearts. The panel discusses the ethical implications, pulling in the increasing ability to build life from DNA up. Sounds scary? It probably isn’t. Probably… Talking about scary, what about massive corporations, whose wealth affords enormous power but whose primary driving force (shareholder value) is fundamentally amoral? Mylena de Pierremont suggests that societal pressures (presumably fuelled by enhanced global communication and wider investor spread) are driving a new business model whereby things like transparency, sustainability and corporate responsibility equate to shareholder value. Maybe those ‘evil giants’ need not be defeated but can be converted. Mark Petz introduces the ‘global village’, as typified by the balance4yourlife project, billed as a new form of ‘intentional community’ – a sustainable urban village firmly anchored in the modern, interconnected world. While global populations are increasingly migrating to cities and city living is proving the most sustainable, can this concept buck that trend? After all, modern communications are often making geographical proximity less important. The attraction of villages, green fields and trees aside, is the small inclusive community, for which humans have arguably evolved, the antithesis of the impersonal anonymity of city life. Is the global village then a potential model for the future, maybe alongside cities? And will we all be invited? – By Paul Holister, Editor The Future Now Show September 2014about Climate Change, Food, Social Revolution and … FeaturingLise Voldeng, CEO & Chief Creative Officer, Ultra-Agent Industries Inc.Kirsten van Dam, Director & Founder, Out Of OfficeArjen Kamphuis, Futurist, Co-founder, CTO, GendoHardy F. Schloer, Managing Director, Schloer Consulting Group Arjen Kamphuis calls climate change humanity’s greatest threat. How will we deal with this and with resource depletion, as forecast famously by the Club of Rome in the ‘70s? Does the point of no return for a solution lie ahead or has it passed and, if so, with what consequences? Kirsten van Dam poses a related critical question, how to feed an ever-increasing population in a time of diminishing resources? Will technology provide an answer, as it has done before, or does mass starvation threaten? A re-run of the Rome model in 2005 forecast collapse for any reasonable input values. And how bad could runaway climate change become? Some suggest a reduction of the Earth’s carrying capacity to 2 million souls. One respectable commentator suggests that a transition to a lifeless new Venus is conceivable. A great threat indeed. Joining the discussion are Hardy Schloer and moderator Lise Voldeng. Solutions might require complete abandonment of the cultural and economic models born with the Industrial Revolution. But how much pain is needed to bring about such a revolution? Hardy Schloer sees a common thread in recent events such as the Arab Spring, ISIS, the troubles in Ukraine and more – the uprising of groups defined by cultural or ethnic heritage, united in their rage against the machine. Are we seeing the beginning of the end of the nation state (a relatively recent construct anyway)? Will a more natural new world order emerge, or an older one re-emerge? How ugly might the transition be? These questions are discussed with Arjen Kamphuis, Kirsten van Dam and moderator Lise Voldeng and it is agreed that the recent revolution in global communications is central, now and for the future. Maybe borders are obstacles and traditional democracy is outdated. Maybe we need a sense of belonging and usefulness that is framed around humanity rather than a nation or economic interests. – By Paul Holister, Editor Energy Innovation Elon Musk is a South Africa-born, Canadian American business magnate, inventor, and investor. He is the CEO and CTO of SpaceX, CEO and chief product architect of Tesla Motors, and chairman of SolarCity. He is the founder SpaceX and considered by many to be the cofounder of PayPal,] Tesla Motors, and Zip2. He has also envisioned a conceptual high-speed transportation system known as the Hyperloop. Steven Chu is an American physicist who served as the 12th United States Secretary of Energy from 2009 to 2013. Chu is known for his research at Bell Labs in cooling and trapping of atoms with laser light, which won him the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1997, along with his scientific colleagues Claude Cohen-Tannoudji and William Daniel Phillips. At the time of his appointment as Energy Secretary, he was a professor of physics and molecular and cellular biology at the University of California, Berkeley, and the director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, where his research was concerned primarily with the study of biological systems at the single molecule level. Previously, he had been a professor of physics at Stanford University. He is a vocal advocate for more research into renewable energy and nuclear power, arguing that a shift away from fossil fuels is essential to combating climate change. Elon Musk and Steven Chu at the energy innovation Summit 2014 Club of Amsterdam blog Club of Amsterdam bloghttp://clubofamsterdam.blogspot.com Socratic Designby Humberto Schwab, Philosopher, Owner, Humberto Schwab Filosofia SL, Director, Club of Amsterdam The Ukrainian Dilemma and the Bigger Pictureby Hardy F. Schloer, Owner, Schloer Consulting Group – SCG, Advisory Board of the Club of Amsterdam The impact of culture on educationby Huib Wursten, Senior Partner, itim International andCarel Jacobs is senior consultant/trainer for itim in The Netherlands, he is also Certification Agent for the Educational Sector of the Hofstede Centre. What more demand for meat means for the futureby Christophe Pelletier, The Happy Future Group Consulting Ltd. Inner peace and generosityby Elisabet Sahtouris, Holder of the Elisabet Sahtouris Chair in Living Economies, World Business Academy News about the Future Implants That Trigger Self-Healing DARPA’s ElectRx program plans to develop technologies to restore and maintain healthy physiological status through monitoring and targeted regulation of signaling in peripheral nerves that control organ functions. Novel therapies based on targeted stimulation of the peripheral nervous system could promote self-healing, reduce dependence on traditional drugs and provide new treatment options for illnesses. ElectRx is also expected to improve peripheral nerve stimulation treatments for brain and mental health disorders, such as epilepsy, traumatic brain injury (TBI), Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and depression. Achieving DARPA’s goals for the program would require new technologies for in vivo sensing and neural stimulation, including advanced biosensors and novel optical, acoustic and electromagnetic devices to achieve precise targeting of individual or small bundles of nerve fibers that control relevant organ functions. “The technology DARPA plans to develop through the ElectRx program could fundamentally change the manner in which doctors diagnose, monitor and treat injury and illness,” said Doug Weber, DARPA program manager. “Instead of relying only on medication—we envision a closed-loop system that would work in concept like a tiny, intelligent pacemaker. It would continually assess conditions and provide stimulus patterns tailored to help maintain healthy organ function, helping patients get healthy and stay healthy using their body’s own systems.” Adenosine can melt “love handles” Researchers at the University of Bonn discover a new signaling pathway to combat excess body weight. The number of overweight persons is greatly increasing worldwide – and as a result is the risk of suffering a heart attack, stroke, diabetes or Alzheimer’s disease. For this reason, many people dream of an efficient method for losing weight. An international team of researchers led by Professor Alexander Pfeifer from the University Hospital Bonn, have now come one step closer to this goal. The scientists discovered a new way to stimulate brown fat and thus burn energy from food: The body’s own adenosine activates brown fat and “browns” white fat. “Not all fat is equal,” says Professor Alexander Pfeifer from the Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology of the University Hospital Bonn. Humans have two different types of fat: undesirable white fat cells which form bothersome “love handles”, for example, as well as brown fat cells, which act like a desirable heater to convert excess energy into heat. “If we are able to activate brown fat cells or to convert white fat cells into brown ones, it might be possible to simply melt excess fat away” reports the pharmacologist. “If adenosine binds to this receptor in brown fat cells, fat burning is significantly stimulated,” reports Dr. Thorsten Gnad from Prof. Pfeifer’s team. It was previously thought not possible for adenosine to activate brown fat. Several studies with rats and hamsters demonstrated that adenosine blocks brown fat. Recommended Book The Future of Continental Philosophy of Religionby Clayton Crockett (Editor), B. Keith Putt (Editor), Jeffrey W. Robbins (Editor) What is the future of Continental philosophy of religion? These forward-looking essays address the new thinkers and movements that have gained prominence since the generation of Derrida, Deleuze, Foucault, and Levinas and how they will reshape Continental philosophy of religion in the years to come. They look at the ways concepts such as liberation, sovereignty, and post-colonialism have engaged this new generation with political theology and the new pathways of thought that have opened in the wake of speculative realism and recent findings in neuroscience and evolutionary psychology. Readers will discover new directions in this challenging and important area of philosophical inquiry. The AsianSquare Dance – 1st part By Michael Akerib, Vice-Rector, SWISS UMEF UNIVERSITY Goldman Sachs first coined the expression BRICs – Brazil, Russia, India and China – to identify the economic giants of the future that will reshape the world economic order. While Russia’s economy is linked to the prices of commodities, energy in particular, Brazil has not lived up to expectations. Of the four countries, China and India have shown the most impressive growth in recent years with, respectively, 10% and 8%. Excluding Brazil, the population of the BRIC represents 40% of the world’s inhabitants. With Asia, reckoned to be today the most dynamic continent, accounting for 65% of the world’s population, and China and India together accounting for 40%, these two countries can potentially alter the fragile equilibrium of the world’s economy. It is forecast that by 2030 the East Asian economies will be the world’s largest economic bloc. Due to diverging political ideologies and concerns, however, this bloc does not, in fact, exist other than in prose. Even worse, all the countries in the area have made significant investments in military equipment over the recent past thus sharply increasing the risk of conflict particularly as fears grow over China’s intentions. The US’ dream, during the cold war, of creating an Asian equivalent to NATO was short lived. Today, Asia has five nuclear powers: Pakistan, India, China, North Korea and Russia. On the other hand, the US is constrained by budgetary problems. Our argument in this series of articles is that the development of Asia, and its impact on the rest of the world, depends to a large extent on the relations between five countries: China, India, Japan, South Korea and the US. Depending on the structure of the type of relations that will develop, and choices made by Russia and the US, for instance on their energy policy, we may see a new world order developing, very different from that of the last four hundred years. Further, if the Chinese economy faces difficulties in the future, the US will be instrumental in determining Asia’s future. Conversely, if the US economy falters, China, if it so wishes, could assume the world’s economic leadership. Since the end of the Second World War, the US’ role in the area has been a major influencing factor politically, militarily and economically and while it has declined recently, it remains, nevertheless, important. Asia is challenging the EU as the world’s most important trade bloc. The US imports from Asia for over $2 trillion per year, thus making the US responsible for the creation of hundreds of thousands of jobs. A weakening of the US dollar could significantly diminish the US’ role in the region. At issue here is what A F K Organski has termed ‘Power transition theory’ – i.e. the change of the guard of the dominant power where the dominant power occupies this position because of its control of resources, be they demographic, economic, geographic, natural or military. According to the theory, the dominant power, or powers, must ensure the stability of the system failing what the system might be challenged by an emerging hegemon. These situations are conducive to confrontation, very often military. The emerging hegemon is, no doubt, China, and the events in Eurasia, over the coming quarter century will witness an indirect confrontation between China and the US, a confrontation whose secondary actors are India and Russia. Is China striving to attain the status of great power and challenge the US, at least regionally, and what role do the other regional powers, as well as Russia and the US play? Or is it just trying to reduce its feeling of being surrounded by enemies? Asia has become a powerhouse with several countries showing economic strength and appearing to be rivals. A dangerous rivalry inasmuch as five countries in the area have a nuclear arsenal (China, India, North Korea, Pakistan and Russia), with two more (Japan and South Korea) able to produce a nuclear bomb in a relatively short time. Monetary reserves in Asia are sufficient to allow the area to develop without much further foreign investments. Further, an increase in economic stability is heralded by the recent agreement between several Asian countries – the members of ASEAN, China, Japan and South Korea – to pool their financial resources in case of a speculative attack. While the major trade partner of most of the countries in the area is Australia, the European Union and the United States, regional trade has increased considerably. Services such as tourism also cater increasingly to Asians. There remains the question of whether the continent is able to develop its own technological base to compete with Europe and the US. There are diverging points of view on the issue. The perception by the Asian countries of the effect of China’s domination of the continent evolved into an understanding that they only have two options – siding with China or with Japan and its US ally. The financial difficulties originating in the US and which have spilled all over the world have affected Asia in its role of major exporter. As a reaction, China, Japan and South Korea are considering the creation of a community modelled on the European Union that would help them expand trade within their area and increase trade with the ASEAN countries, Russia, the Middle East and Europe. They are encouraged in this action as inter-Asian trade has been growing at twice the rate of global trade. Inter-Asian trade is more important as a percentage of total trade than inter-NAFTA trade. The US should fear the creation of a trading block including China, Japan and South Korea as it would represent 43% of US’ foreign trade and holdings of over one trillion dollars in US Treasury paper.Common problemsThe countries in the area, with the notable exception of Russia, share two major problems: access to raw materials in general, and energy in particular, and an economy essentially geared to exports, and thus very dependent on the purchasing power of EU and US consumers. This last aspect is changing rapidly though with domestic markets starting to take shape and offering local producers a partial insulation from the American-led boom and bust cycles. It is generally felt in the US that China has not been doing enough to stimulate internal demand – the number of consumers is no bigger than Italy while the population is 20 times that of the European country – and that the situation has been worsened by the decision of the Chinese government to peg the Yuan to the US dollar, thus effectively undertaking a devaluation. Should China’s export drive remain as a major contributor the country’s economy, the accumulation of reserves by 2020 will be bigger than that of Germany, Japan and the Middle East countries put together. America’s response could be to return to a more isolationist policy by slapping import duties on Chinese products or getting China to open its doors to greater exports of US products. Both China and India have to contend with an extremely large population. In fact, they are the only two countries with a population of over 1 billion persons. Economic development has brought, to both countries, an uneven distribution of wealth to the extent that social disruptions can be feared in the future. China has become the world’s second largest oil consumer and it is likely that it will surpass the US to lead the world in energy use. Imports which represent 50% of consumption are likely to rise to reach 80% in another 10 – 15 years particularly considering the oil intensity of economic growth is particularly high, as in most developing countries. Thus, for each 1% growth in GDP, the country needs 1.2% additional oil. In fact, China is the world’s fast-growing energy user, Russia is the most inefficient user of energy and he US is the country with the largest carbon footprint. China is also the world’s largest consumer of several raw materials.The country’s search for natural resources has been done in a predatory way, and there is fear that, backed by its staggering reserves, it could encourage suppliers to increase prices at levels beyond those acceptable to a large number of other users. India’s energy requirements are expected to grow by 30% in the next 3 to 5 years and its imported crude oil dependency is expected to reach 95% by 2025. India depends for 50% of its energy needs on coal and increasing its use would create major environmental problems. Its gas suppliers are considered to be relatively unreliable and include Bangladesh, Iran, Myanmar and Turkmenistan. This situation has encouraged India to pursue the road to nuclear power.Such growth in raw material requirements is not sustainable and is strategically dangerous. Both China and India have very large armies (in fact the largest in the world) and nuclear weapons. Japan is also a major energy importer, relying entirely on imports for oil. Japan has an important stockpile of energy products, and it has encouraged other Asian countries, including China, to jointly plan the stocks and their administration. Indeed, Asia’s energy needs are expected to double in the coming 20 years. In spite of this, OPEC countries do not seem to be prepared to invest in increasing production, in large part because of the massive funds required. They have been estimated by McKinsey to be of the order of $ 45 billion a year over the next three decades. The countries in the area perceive themselves as rivals in securing energy sources and China, particularly, has shown an eagerness to develop partnerships, whether through limited investments, or through political support, in the United Nations, of countries like Iran. Hydrocarbon reserves in the China Sea are claimed by several countries, and are a growing point of contention. Neighboring countries are fearful of China’s rising military power and have led them to develop closer relations with the US. In an effort to temper their competition, India and China have made some joint bids to buy and share oil fields. Japan too is dependent on energy imports and has recently been unlucky with their supply sources. Thus, they have had to curtail their investments in Iran, Kuwait, Russia and Saudi Arabia. To counterbalance these losses, Japan has offered Saudi Arabia the possibility of building oil-storage facilities in Okinawa, provided Japan can have access to them in case of emergency. A closer rapprochement between the two countries depends, however, on the US’ willingness for this to take place as the Saudi monarchy depends on the US military shield against the rising threat of Iran and of the djihadists, and there is no way Japan can replace the US in that role. This, in spite of the fact that Asia is today, by far, the largest buyer of both Saudi and more generally, Middle Eastern oil – up to 60% and 70% of their exports, respectively. Reliance on Russia for energy is therefore extremely important. While a pipeline is being built from Siberia to the Pacific that could partly alleviate these escalating needs, a number of other pipeline projects have been proposed. All these projects require large investments ($ 1-2 million per kilometer of pipeline or around $ 12 billion for the pipeline that will link Russia and China), long delays in building and face substantial political and ecological problems. Further, the gas transmission systems in China and Japan are under-developed and therefore not suitable for the transport of large quantities of imported gas. Russian industry has access to gas supplies at prices substantially below those practised on world markets and has therefore become a voracious user. The Russian government will be increasing prices for domestic consumption, including for private heating, and / or turning to alternative energy sources such as coal, hydro-electric or nuclear power. Other possibilities have also been considered, but they all depend on Russia’s cooperation. Thus, for instance, integrating the energy grids of Russia with those of China, Japan and the two Koreas has been proposed to enable the exchange of seasonal surplus. This entails not only Russia’s cooperation, but also North Korea’s. It also requires large investments, although possibly not of the scale of building a pipeline network. Another common point between the China, India, Japan and South Korea is that they constitute, jointly, the world’s largest weapons market and their suppliers are the European Union, Russia and the United States. China and Japan also share the will to stop North Korea’s nuclear program. The two countries are also large emitters of greenhouse gases. Both China and Russia fear, perhaps rightly so, that the US is conducting an encirclement strategy due to their military presence in Central Asia as well as, in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan as far as China is concerned, and Russia is concerned with a possible NATO expansion in Europe. ISIS and Western intelligence role in the Middle East ISIS and Western intelligence role in the Middle East by Annie Machon. ” … We can’t defeat terrorism by war! …” Machon is a former intelligence officer for MI5, the UK Security Service, who resigned in 1996 to blow the whistle on the spies’ incompetence and crimes. Drawing on her varied experiences, she is now a media pundit, author, journalist, political campaigner, and PR consultant. Futurist Portrait: Geci Karuri-Sebina Geci Karuri-Sebina Chair & Director: South African Node at The Millennium ProjectExecutive Manager: Programmes at SA Cities NetworkResearch Associate: Institute for Economic Research on Innovation (IERI) Geci’s interests are broadly in foresight and R&D spanning a range of public policy, development, and innovation issues. She is actively involved in the futures study field which she champions through her role as a founding member and director of the SA Node of the Millennium Project. She holds an MA in Urban Planning, and a Masters in Architecture and Urban Design from the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and a PhD in development planning and innovation from the University of Witwatersrand.Geci Karuri-Sebina: … “Johannesburg hopes to be a vibrant, equitable, diverse, sustainable, resilient and adaptive city by 2040, a vision that will require rigorous engagement and monitoring over time, in unfolding contexts.…As a foresight enthusiast and practitioner, Johannesburg’s growth and development vision appeals greatly. Not because it will accurately predict or enable a specific outcome – “a world class African city”, “a city of our dreams”, “a city growing with you”, or “a city that works for me,” as various cities across South Africa have outlined in their catchy slogans – but because espousing a view to the future is a basic prerequisite of visionary action. It is a bold move, creating the potential to focus and capture the imaginations of the co-creators and constituents of that future. A basic question remains: What exactly is the future that we see for the entirety of our city? Before we begin talking of GDS 2050, perhaps we should attempt a shared peek from the mountaintop, to see if there is a believable and grounded promised land ahead, with clear signs behind, and many signposts in between.” Source: CityScapes Geci Karuri-Sebina, South Africa Node of the Millennium Project, Baku Futures Forum Agenda Watch The Future Now Show! Season Events 2014 / 2015 UKthe future of Collective IntelligenceJanuary 28, 2015Location: The Cube, Studio 5, 155 Commercial Street, London E1 6BJThis is a collaboration between The Cube and the Club of Amsterdam. UKthe future of Metro VitalityAprll 24, 2015Location: LondonThis is a collaboration between APF and the Club of Amsterdam Special Supporters printable version
Content Change is inevitable – Confusion is undesirableThe Future Now Show Drowning PreventionClub of Amsterdam blogNews about the FutureRecommended Book: The Resilience Dividend: Being Strong in a World Where Things Go Wrong The Asian Square Dance – Part 2balance4yourlifeFuturist Portrait: Cecily Sommers Agenda Special supporters Club of Amsterdam SearchSubmit your articleContactSubscribe Welcome to the Club of Amsterdam Journal. In this show we are talking about Changing Universities, political transition in the Middle East and North Africa and …. The Future Now Show Felix F Bopp, Founder & Chairman Change is inevitable – Confusion is undesirable by René GudePhilosopher,former director International School of Philosophy,former publisher Filosofie Magazine,Denker des Vaderlands ‘We are moving into an era of great uncertainty. We have never experienced the kinds of historical changes we are experiencing now. Frankly, no one has a clue about the nature of the new world order which is emerging. Experts are clueless,’ – Kishore Mahbubani in a weblog 2010 – and he continues: ‘And how does one prepare for uncertainty? How does one acquire the facility to do this? The answer is a Western liberal arts education.’ While the West, in the rush to stay ahead of the Asian economies, puts all cards on beta developments, Asians import Western philosophy as a critical component of coping with change and uncertainty. The West looks for ‘new’ and ‘different’ and techniques that change the world, while – under the name ‘critical method’ – we have made available a vast experience in research confusion. We can also preserve calm: Do not develop change management but confusion-management; excavate where we are already good at. In other words, do not change the world before you have your own confusion under control. Problem in staccato: 1. Complexity is the result of one part change (historical changes) and one part confusion (great uncertainty, experts are clueless) 2. There are two standard forms to elimínate the confusion component are: “fast – ” and “‘slow re-acting”‘ a. The rapid method for dealing with uncertainty is Trial & Error. Better a wrong decision than no decision. No delay with the risk: too hastily.b. A time-consuming way of dealing with uncertainty is to go Slow Thinking; first think (think about it) and only then take a decision. Procrastination (époche) with the risk: indecision. 3. The Critical Method – core component of Western philosophy – is an approach that makes Slow Thinking so efficient, that it hardly takes more time than Trial & Error. The crux is: once systematic thinking about how you think! Before we are really prepared to concentrate on our thinking, we must free ourselves from the mistaken idea that ‘thinking about our thinking’ is a superfluous luxury. We must see clearly that our thinking is the unseen foundation upon-which our society rests, and that how we think today will determining what tomorrow will bring. (Polly Leer) 4. The Critical Method is a training in Critical skills with the knowledge-theories from the present (Nussbaum, Sennett, Sloterdijk) and the past (Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, Kant, Schopenhauer, Wittgenstein) as practice material. Workflow See through that any observation is theory loaded. “You can never know easily the state of affairs itself. There is always a limited perspective, a one-sided view. So the question is: which perspective, which position. We always live in historically determined “Verkünstelungen”. – Herman Schmitz (2009) – To understand that theory in our restriction is based on: ‘The mind is inarguably impressive, but it is still flawed, or at in ways we scarcely recognize. For the most part, we simply accept our faults – such as emotional outbursts, our mediocre memories, and vulnerability to prejudice – as standard equipment. Our brains are a kluge (hassle), an ill-assorted collection of poorly matching parts, forming a distressing whole.‘ – Gary Marcus, Kluge – The Haphazard Construction of the Human Mind, 2008 – Seeing that our restriction is limited (make a virtue of necessity), and to develop on that base a habit to not err. The Future Now Show Shape the future now, where near-future impact counts and visions and strategies for preferred futures start. Do we rise above global challenges? Or do we succumb to them? The Future Now Show explores how we can shape our future now – where near-future impact counts. We showcase strategies and solutions that create futures that work. Every month we roam through current events, discoveries, and challenges – sparking discussion about the connection between today and the futures we’re making – and what we need, from strategy to vision – to make the best ones. The Future Now ShowNovember 2014FeaturingSimon Jones, Provost at Nazarbayev University, KazakhstanJames M Dorsey, SingaporeHumberto Schwab, Owner Humberto Schwab Filosofia, Spain about political transition in the Middle East and North Africa and … In late 2010 and for some time after the Arab Spring raised hopes of an awakening in societies across the Middle East and North Africa of principles long cherished in ”the West” – human rights, social justice, equality and so on. What went wrong? Four years later the phrase “Arab Winter” has gained currency. Has it all turned sour or is it just the start of a long, painful, and possibly bloody, process with many years yet to play out? Has something in these societies changed irrevocably? Will the geopolitical interests of major powers, including those of the “free” and democratic West, stifle the nascent ambitions in these regions in the name of stability, as they have done in the past? – Paul Holister, Editor about Changing Universities and … When you think about universities, Kazakhstan probably doesn’t come to mind. Yet it houses a university that has partnerships with prestigious universities from around the world. The incentive for such universities in many non-western and often non-democratic countries seems primarily economic – the Asian Tigers demonstrated the economic value of easy access to quality higher education. But questions arise. As higher education becomes increasingly a privilege in the US, what sort of economic shifts might result? How do these universities differ from traditional western ones, especially in societies where freedom of speech is more limited? Are they just turning out skilled cogs for businesses or people more broadly developed intellectually? Does involvement of prestigious western institutions help prop up autocratic regimes? Or is the long-term effect inevitably for the greater good? – Paul Holister, Editor Drowning Prevention by the World Health Organization Key facts Drowning is the 3rd leading cause of unintentional injury death worldwide, accounting for 7% of all injury-related deaths. There are an estimated 372 000 annual drowning deaths worldwide.Global estimates may significantly underestimate the actual public health problem related to drowning. Children, males and individuals with increased access to water are most at risk of drowning. Drowning is the process of experiencing respiratory impairment from submersion/immersion in liquid; outcomes are classified as death, morbidity and no morbidity. Scope of the problem In 2012, an estimated 372 000 people died from drowning, making drowning a major public health problem worldwide. Injuries account for over 9% of total global mortality. Drowning is the 3rd leading cause of unintentional injury death, accounting for 7% of all injury-related deaths. The global burden and death from drowning is found in all economies and regions, however: low- and middle-income countries account for 91% of unintentional drowning deaths; over half of the world’s drowning occurs in the WHO Western Pacific Region and WHO South-East Asia Region; drowning death rates are highest in the WHO African Region, and are 10-13 times higher than those seen in the United Kingdom or Germany respectively. Despite limited data, several studies reveal information on the cost impact of drowning. In the United States of America, 45% of drowning deaths are among the most economically active segment of the population. Coastal drowning in the United States alone accounts for US$ 273 million each year in direct and indirect costs. In Australia and Canada, the total annual cost of drowning injury is US$ 85.5 million and US$ 173 million respectively. There is a wide range of uncertainty around the estimate of global drowning deaths. Official data categorization methods for drowning exclude intentional drowning deaths (suicide or homicide) and drowning deaths caused by flood disasters and water transport incidents. Data from high-income countries suggest these categorization methods result in significant underrepresentation of the full drowning toll by up to 50% in some high-income countries. Non-fatal drowning statistics in many countries are not readily available or are unreliable. Risk factors AgeAge is one of the major risk factors for drowning. This relationship is often associated with a lapse in supervision. Globally, the highest drowning rates are among children 1-4 years, followed by children 5-9 years. In the WHO Western Pacific Region children aged 5-14 years die more frequently from drowning than any other cause. Child drowning statistics from a number of countries are particularly revealing: Drowning is one of the top 5 causes of death for people aged 1-14 years for 48 of 85 countries with data meeting inclusion criteria. Australia: drowning is the leading cause of unintentional injury death in children aged 1-3 years. Bangladesh: drowning accounts for 43% of all deaths in children aged 1-4 years. China: drowning is the leading cause of injury death in children aged 1-14 years. United States: drowning is the second leading cause of unintentional injury death in children aged 1-14 years. GenderMales are especially at risk of drowning, with twice the overall mortality rate of females. They are more likely to be hospitalized than females for non-fatal drowning. Studies suggest that the higher drowning rates among males are due to increased exposure to water and riskier behaviour such as swimming alone, drinking alcohol before swimming alone and boating. Access to waterIncreased access to water is another risk factor for drowning. Individuals with occupations such as commercial fishing or fishing for subsistence, using small boats in low-income countries are more prone to drowning. Children who live near open water sources, such as ditches, ponds, irrigation channels, or pools are especially at risk. Flood disastersDrowning accounts for 75% of deaths in flood disasters. Flood disasters are becoming more frequent and this trend is expected to continue. Drowning risks increase with floods particularly in low- and middle-income countries where people live in flood prone areas and the ability to warn, evacuate, or protect communities from floods is weak or only just developing. Travelling on waterDaily commuting and journeys made by migrants or asylum seekers often take place on overcrowded, unsafe vessels lacking safety equipment or are operated by personnel untrained in dealing with transport incidents or navigation. Personnel under the influence of alcohol or drugs are also a risk. Other risk factorsThere are other factors that are associated with an increased risk of drowning, such as: lower socioeconomic status, being a member of an ethnic minority, lack of higher education, and rural populations all tend to be associated, although this association can vary across countries; infants left unsupervised or alone with another child around water;alcohol use, near or in the water; medical conditions, such as epilepsy; tourists unfamiliar with local water risks and features; Prevention There are many actions to prevent drowning. Installing barriers (e.g. covering wells, using doorway barriers and playpens, fencing swimming pools etc.) to control access to water hazards, or removing water hazards entirely greatly reduces water hazard exposure and risk. Community-based, supervised child care for pre-school children can reduce drowning risk and has other proven health benefits. Teaching school-age children basic swimming, water safety and safe rescue skills is another approach. But these efforts must be undertaken with an emphasis on safety, and an overall risk management that includes a safety-tested curricula, a safe training area, screening and student selection, and student-instructor ratios established for safety. Effective policies and legislation are also important for drowning prevention. Setting and enforcing safe boating, shipping and ferry regulations is an important part of improving safety on the water and preventing drowning. Building resilience to flooding and managing flood risks through better disaster preparedness planning, land use planning, and early warning systems can prevent drowning during flood disasters. Developing a national water safety strategy can raise awareness of safety around water, build consensus around solutions, provide strategic direction and a framework to guide multisectoral action and allow for monitoring and evaluation of efforts. WHO response WHO released the “Global report on drowning: preventing a leading killer” in November 2014. This is the first time WHO has developed a report dedicated exclusively to drowning. The report points out that drowning has been highly overlooked to date, and that a great deal more should be done by governments and the research and policy communities to prioritize drowning prevention and its integration with other public health agendas. The “Global report on drowning” provides recommendations to governments to tailor and implement effective drowning prevention programmes to their settings, improve data about drowning, and develop national water safety plans. The report also points out the multisectoral nature of drowning and calls for greater coordination and collaboration among UN agencies, governments, key NGOs and academic institutions to prevent drowning. At country level, WHO has worked with Ministries of Health in some low- and middle-income countries to prevent drowning through the use of barriers controlling access to water and the establishment of day care centres for pre-school children. In addition, WHO has also funded research in low-income countries exploring priority questions related to drowning prevention. At a regional level, WHO organizes training programmes and convenes workshops to draw together representatives of governments, NGOs and UN agencies working on drowning prevention.Fact sheet N°347, Updated November 2014 Club of Amsterdam blog Club of Amsterdam bloghttp://clubofamsterdam.blogspot.com Socratic Designby Humberto Schwab, Philosopher, Owner, Humberto Schwab Filosofia SL, Director, Club of Amsterdam The Ukrainian Dilemma and the Bigger Pictureby Hardy F. Schloer, Owner, Schloer Consulting Group – SCG, Advisory Board of the Club of Amsterdam The impact of culture on educationby Huib Wursten, Senior Partner, itim International andCarel Jacobs is senior consultant/trainer for itim in The Netherlands, he is also Certification Agent for the Educational Sector of the Hofstede Centre. What more demand for meat means for the futureby Christophe Pelletier, The Happy Future Group Consulting Ltd. Inner peace and generosityby Elisabet Sahtouris, Holder of the Elisabet Sahtouris Chair in Living Economies, World Business Academy News about the Future Feldheim in Germany – The energy self-sufficient villageEnergy supply to the energy-efficient village of Feldheim via private local heating and power grids. One of the most spectacular concepts for supplying enterprises, private households and local government with renewable energies on a decentralised, self-sufficient basis is currently being implemented in Feldheim, a district in Treuenbrietzen, a town in Brandenburg. The project owes its success to the excellent partnership between the municipality of Treuenbrietzen, the inhabitants of Feldheim and the project developer, Energiequelle GmbH. Build your digital doppelgänger “We can produce highly accurate body models and perform analysis on these models’ data. The R&D to produce these models allows us to compare, morph, animate, and average bodies.” “Everyone will have their own digital body model,” O’Farrell, CEO of Body Labs, predicts. “You’ll be able to upload the avatar to sites to, say, shop for your body shape on Amazon, or send the file to a ski company to order custom-made ski boots. You could use it to compare body shapes with matches on Match.com, to make sure that guy is as athletic and fit as he says he is.” The platform can take incoming data, either measurements or from scanners, to create a highly realistic, anatomically accurate digital avatar of any specific human. “It could be you, or me, or a hypothetical prototype,” O’Farrell says, “and we can make that avatar run through any motion available, whether it’s running, jumping, kicking, or swimming, with full fidelity to the way a human really looks and moves.” Recommended Book The Resilience Dividend: Being Strong in a World Where Things Go Wrongby Judith Rodin (Author) Building resilience — the ability to bounce back more quickly and effectively — is an urgent social and economic issue. Our interconnected world is susceptible to sudden and dramatic shocks and stresses: a cyber-attack, a new strain of virus, a structural failure, a violent storm, a civil disturbance, an economic blow. Through an astonishing range of stories, Judith Rodin shows how people, organizations, businesses, communities, and cities have developed resilience in the face of otherwise catastrophic challenges: • Medellin, Colombia, was once the drug and murder capital of South America. Now it’s host to international conferences and an emerging vacation destination.• Tulsa, Oklahoma, cracked the code of rapid urban development in a floodplain.• Airbnb, Toyota, Ikea, Coca-Cola, and other companies have realized the value of reducing vulnerabilities and potential threats to customers, employees, and their bottom line.• In the Mau Forest of Kenya, bottom-up solutions are critical for dealing with climate change, environmental degradation, and displacement of locals.• Following Superstorm Sandy, the Rockaway Surf Club in New York played a vital role in distributing emergency supplies. As we grow more adept at managing disruption and more skilled at resilience-building, Rodin reveals how we are able to create and take advantage of new economic and social opportunities that offer us the capacity to recover after catastrophes and grow strong in times of relative calm. The AsianSquare Dance – Part 2 By Michael Akerib, Vice-Rector SWISS UMEF UNIVERSITY The Chinese remember something that has been mostly forgotten by other nations. Namely, that is only these last 150 years that the country has had the status of what we would call today a ‘developing’ or ’emerging’ country. Therefore, from the point of view of both the government and its simplest citizens, the country is simply regaining its previous status of one of the world’s largest – if not the largest – economy and the world’s largest exporter. Since it has done so, in part, by flooding the market with products sold at cut-throat prices, it has led to the destruction of millions of jobs in the ‘developed’ countries just as the Industrial Revolution destroyed millions of jobs in China and India. Among its present accomplishments, China has the world’s largest population. Population growth has been a traditional characteristic of the country and has led, in the past to famines and the consequent social unrest. The one-child policy, now becoming a two-child policy with the long-term objective of becoming a three-child policy, is a direct result of this chequered history. Even with the present low-growth population, the country needs to create 30 million jobs per year to maintain the rate of economic growth it has known over the last 20 years. The inability of the economy to grow may well revert the country to social unrest which the government could attempt to prevent through the encouragement of nationalism, perhaps to the extent of starting a conflict. China’s growth has been fostered essentially by the availability of abundant cheap labor which has attracted massive investments from foreign corporations. The salary increases, particularly in the coastal areas, and the migration of some of its workforce to Africa, have led both Chinese and foreign companies to either move their production sites inland, where salaries remain low, or to invest in Southeast Asia. The Chinese economic model stands in a category by itself as state-run companies stand side by side with private enterprise. Both are export-driven and benefit greatly from the opening of world-wide markets that the United States and its economic allies put in place by fostering the globalization process through the GATT and later the WTO. One may wonder, however, if the model chosen – i.e. exporting low cost goods while importing raw materials at ever rising prices – is sustainable. Unless China will be able to innovate, particularly in high tech products, it will see a stunting of its growth. If, however, its industry does evolve into a high tech industry, it may face import limitations from countries that may suffer of a negative impact on their employment statistics. President Xi’s ‘China Dream’, with a first time horizon of 2021 followed by a second one of 2049, is, in a first stage, to raise income levels to those of middle-income countries, and, in a second stage, to that of the most advanced economies. 2013 per capita GDP was of USD 6’800, about 20% of US GDP. This figure, however, hides a middle class of 200 million persons. The country also suffers from a banking system burdened by bad debts estaimated to represent 60% of all outstanding loasn. Loans of government, central and local, represent 45% of GDP. China’s economic power is felt throughout Asia, with all the countries of the continent economically linked to it and dependent on China’s sustained economic growth. The present recession, leading to a major decrease in exports, has led voices to claim that the economy is on the verge of collapse due to a forthcoming banking crisis and a bursting property bubble. Should it coincide with a massive epidemic, it would grind the economy of the country, together with that of many of its trade partners, to a halt. China has also become the world’s biggest lender with figures in the billions of dollars. Its lending activity in a large number of countries stretching from Africa to Europe while passing through Central Asia and Latin America, shows its ambition of replacing the domination of US and European institutions in the financing of infrastructure. Perhaps its most ambitious moves have been the creation of a banking initiative with Brazil, Russia, India and South Africa and an Asian Development Bank. The latter with a capital of USD 50 billion and will be in direct competition with the official Asian Development Bank and even with the World Bank. China will contribute 50% of the capital, the remaining 50% being paid by 21 other countries including India, Singapore, Vietnam and Qatar. President Xi has also put a proposal called the SREB, for Silk Road Economic Belt, which is a model for South – South development. While centered on Central Asia, it involves a large number of countries, including some in Europe. Countries may have to make the difficult choice between Chinese capital and Western technology. China also runs the world’s second largest military budget, with an emphasis on developing its naval capabilities – including submarines. It to not only wants to secure the hydrocarbon supply routes, but also aims to counter the US naval presence around its maritime borders. For the time being, however, it is not a credible threat to the US, particularly considering the latter’s nuclear capabilities. China feels constrained on its naval borders by the presence of the US Navy as well as by that of Taiwan, a US ally which the US has repeatedly stated it would protect in case of an attack. The only possibility for China to successfully conclude a military invasion of the island would be for it to move extremely rapidly so as to reach its objective before the US would have time to intervene. It would have to hold US naval power at bay with the precision weapons it is presently acquiring. Taiwan is not the only country with which it is possibly in a conflictual situation. It has extended its maritime sovereignty, in the hope of finding hydrocarbon deposits on a string of small islands and rocks. It has thus taken a threatening position with Japan, Korea, the Philippines and Vietnam. On its Northern border, lie the Central Asian states that were part of the Soviet Union. Their small population lies, for some of these countries, on major hydrocarbon reserves. They are natural suppliers of China and do not carry the risk of transport disruptions as is the case with the maritime routes. At least half of Kazakhstan’s oil sector is now owned by China which has also built a pipeline connecting to Turkmenistan with the potential of extending it to Iran. Further north, Russia is a major oil and gas supplier. Russia uses this growing major partnership as a threat to the European Union that has applied biting sanctions. Extending its reach even further, China has become a shareholder of Total, the Franco-Belgian oil and gas producer. President Xi sees the rise of China as inevitable in view of what he sees as the irreversible decline of the West. China’s youth sees their future as ever brighter. Will the future include the Communist Party, at least in its present form? Does a brighter future mean also the status of a world power and the demise of the United States as the hegemon? balance4yourlife Mark Petz talks with Anette Pekrul about balance4yourlife.org – “the world’s First Holistic Multi-cultural Multi-Generation Collective Community”. See also The Future Now Show featuring Mark Petz Futurist Portrait: Cecily Sommers A global trends analyst, Cecily Sommers speaks, writes, and consults on emerging trends, markets, and technologies shaping our future. She is the author of Think Like a Futurist: Know What Changes, What Doesn’t, and What’s Next and the founder of The Push Institute, a non-profit think tank that tracks significant global trends and their implications for business, government, and non-profit sectors over the next 5-10-25-50 years. An unorthodox background in medicine and dance, combined with her experience in brand strategy and product development brings unique vision and creativity into her work as a Strategic Foresight and Innovation Consultant for Fortune 500 companies as well as smaller private businesses and not-for profits. Cecily is a member of the Association of Professional Futurists and a frequent contributor to Public Radio’s “All Things Considered” and other media outlets. She was named by the Business Journal as one of twenty-five “Women to Watch,” and selected as one of Fast Company’s “Fast 50 Reader Favorites.” Cecily lives in Minneapolis, Minnesota. “Here is a quick look at my work as a Futurist, which has resulted in innovative, successful strategy for such companies as Target, Best Buy, General Mills, Kraft, Motorola, Nestle Purina, and Yahoo: First, I use a model I have developed that I call the Four Forces of Change – Demographics, Technology, Resources and Governance – as a predictive tool to see what the future you want to succeed in will look like when you get there. Then, I use the latest in brain science research to show how we are neurologically wired to stay stuck in the Permanent Present, a bit of evolutionary development that brings short-term comfort but kills creative–and hence long-term–thinking. The art of getting unstuck comes in the Zone of Discovery, where we approach the fundamental questions of strategy – Who Are You? and Where Are You Going? – through a set of activities I custom-design to manipulate you into a left-right-left brain pattern of thinking. And finally, the Five Percent Rule is a simple, systematic approach to incorporating long-term thinking into your work life without sacrificing its short-term demands.” Agenda Watch The Future Now Show! Season Events 2014 / 2015 LondonJanuary 28, 2015the future of Collective IntelligenceLocation: The Cube, Studio 5, 155 Commercial Street, London E1 6BJThis is a collaboration between The Cube and the Club of Amsterdam. LondonApril 24, 2015the future of Metro VitalityLocation: ARUP, LondonA collaboration between the Association of Professional Futurists and the Club of Amsterdam and hosted by ARUP Foresight + Research + Innovation. Special Supporters printable version
Content The Asian Square Dance – Part 3The Future Now Show February Event: the future of Collective Intelligence Mr. and Mrs. Fleming, Step Forward to Make This Energy Transition Real!Club of Amsterdam blogNews about the FutureRecommended Book: Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies Syntact – touch the soundDeveloping the capacity to “See More” is the great adventure of our timeFuturist Portrait: Ramez Naam Agenda Special supporters Club of Amsterdam SearchSubmit your articleContactSubscribe Welcome to the Club of Amsterdam Journal. In this show we are talking about Governance for All / Philosophy unbound / Robotics and A.I. and … featuring Karin Jironet, Markus Petz, Katie Aquino, aka “Miss Metaverse”, Annegien Blokpoel and Paul Holister The Future Now Show …. and join our event in London about the future of Collective Intelligence, Wednesday, February 11, 7-9pm.With Hardy Schloer about:How will humanity manage the transition from a human based intelligence to a superior machine intelligence in a constructive, peaceful and practical way? Felix F Bopp, Founder & Chairman The Asian Square Dance – Part 3 By Michael Akerib, Vice-Rector SWISS UMEF UNIVERSITY IndiaIndia is the world’s largest democracy, and one of the few legitimate democracies in Asia showing that, contrary to statements of certain pundits, that democratic concepts can be successfully applied outside the West. Contrary to what is happening in China, its population of 1.2 billion, according to the latest census, continues to grow in spite of the fact that it has the world’s highest infant mortality rates. Its working age population is expected to add another 125 million in the next 10 years. This translates in large capital needs for additional infrastructure, making it dependent on foreign investments to a much larger extent than China. Unless it invests massively in infrastructure, its development will be very much hindered. There is a large imbalance between the genders with a ratio at birth of 914 girls for 100 boys. Life expectancy at birth is of 65 years. Half the population is younger than 18, a quarter is rural and a third lives in extreme poverty. A large proportion of the population is poor, with 50% having no access to electricity. Poverty is not evenly distriuted geographically, with some states considerably poorer than others – a gap widening ever more thus creating the threat of social movements. A Maoist insurgency has already taken hold. Nevertheless, the middle and upper class is forecast to grow from its present figure of 200 million to 1 billion by 2050. Credits: BFA 2010 (ab.eu) Its economy, the world’s third largest and second-fastest growing, should reach USD 25 to 30 trillion by 2050 and could be the world’s third largest after that of the US and China. Some analysts even believe it will be the world’s largest on a PPP basis, reaching USD 86 trillion, in that time horizon. In as much as, contrary to China, its economy is not geared to exports, it is less sensitive to global economic crises. However, it does rely on foreign direct investments to fund its large trade deficit. India’s development hinges on its ability to carry out a number of reforms, and in particular improve its infrastructure and the educational level of its citizens with a concomitant evolution of the population’s mentality away from a mindset embedded in traditions that forbid it from developing into a modern country, and clean up the environmental damage created by an unruly development. The country’s interaction with the other Asian countries remains, however, weak as Pakistan acts as an effective geographical barrier. It fears the strengthening of the China-Pakistan alliance; has no direct access to Central Asian energy producers and mistrusts the US. One of its main oil suppliers is Iran. In spite of these shortcomings, it has been successful in attracting businesses, particularly from Europe, to outsource their manufacturing and services or even to acquire Indian corporations. The country became a nuclear power in the 1990s and is continuing to develop its delivery capacity. Its agreement with the Atomic Energy Agency has created a precedent of allowing the country to have access to nuclear technology without signing the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. It is thus able to divert uranium from civilian to military programs. Military spending makes it the world’s largest buyer of weapons, with Russia as its main supplier. It is believed to have budgeted USD 100 billion for purchases over the next 10 years. It is expanding its naval power, acquiring aircraft carriers and planes to secure shipping lanes for hydrocarbons, just as China is doing. Read also The Asian Square Dance – Part 1 The Asian Square Dance – Part 2 The Future Now Show Shape the future now, where near-future impact counts and visions and strategies for preferred futures start. Do we rise above global challenges? Or do we succumb to them? The Future Now Show explores how we can shape our future now – where near-future impact counts. We showcase strategies and solutions that create futures that work. Every month we roam through current events, discoveries, and challenges – sparking discussion about the connection between today and the futures we’re making – and what we need, from strategy to vision – to make the best ones. The Future Now ShowDecember 2014 FeaturingAndreas M. Walker, weiterdenken.ch, Co-President, swissfuture, SwitzerlandNick Price, Creative Business Consultant and Futurist, UKHardy F. Schloer, Owner, Schloer Consulting Group, MalaysiaLise Voldeng, CEO & Chief Creative Officer, Ultra-Agent Industries Inc., Canada / USAPaul Holister, Editor, Summary Text about the Hope Barometer and … How are we doing? If you ask that question of a politician or journalist you will likely get an answer quoting the gross domestic product (GDP), an impersonal metric that someone once derided as a measure of how much we are stealing from the future to sell in the present. So what should we usefully measure? Bhutan introduced “Gross National Happiness” 40 years ago. The Swiss have been indexing fears and worries for 30 years, but they now also have a barometer of hope. How do these measures differ in terms of focus (personal, national, global) and depth, in the sense of being reactive to current events (disasters, terrorist attacks) or founded on fundamental human desires? How do they differ across cultures? A rich topic in which investigation and discussion have only just begun. about Collaborative Networks and … The topic of this show is collaborative networks, which are generally associated with leveraging the internet to work in groups where the members are geographically separated. But the mere existence of social networks like Facebook enables spontaneous collaboration regardless of geographical separation and some activist groups are already using this to great effect. But what are the broader implications of such collaboration? National cultures show strong differences in sentiment, in perception of threats and priorities, and we know that people instinctively behave differently in groups than individually. Will globally connected groups emerge that overshadow national groups or will group sentiments give way to individual sentiments? Will we become more varied or more homogenous, more easily manipulated or more independent in mind and heart, more harmonious or more discordant? about Privacy and … Despite outrage about intrusions of the NSA into our privacy, hordes of us are letting companies like Google ever deeper into our private lives because of the targeted services this enables. Social and work-related discussions increasingly take place in public forums. Do we need to abandon our privacy and accept that our chats, our musings, our lives in general, are open to public view?Would such an evolution lead to a culture of transparency with greater openness? Greater tolerance? Or more mindless mobs? Is it actually a step back, to the days of the village or tribe when everyone knew what everyone else was doing, an environment for which humans evolved and are arguably better adapted to than the more recent civilisation with its anonymity and demigods? February Event: the future of Collective Intelligence The Club of Amsterdam visits London.the future of Collective IntelligenceFebruary 11, 2015, 7-9pmLocation: The Cube, Studio 5, 155 Commercial Street, London E1 6BJThis is a collaboration between The Cube and the Club of Amsterdam. ContentHow will humanity manage the transition from a human based intelligence to a superior machine intelligence in a constructive, peaceful and practical way?The emergence of Global Intelligence marks the fundamental transition from event-based development and event-based learning to continuous network enabled parallel development and continuous learning, by man, and by machine; simultaneously and complimentary. Similar to aspen trees, where the roots grow for 100s of meter underground, to meet roots of other aspen trees, to exchange information about water and soil conditions, the global networks of machines and its operators begin more and more to understand in real-time the causalities of changes in information streams and react in real-time as well. This process will shape the future more than anything else of the past 1,000 years. One of the most profound changes will be that Intelligence will not be any longer a competitive process, but a complimentary and cooperative process. This will shape, how we govern countries, conduct commerce and manage crisis. with Hardy Schloer, Managing Director, Schloer Consulting Group,Advisory Board, Club of Amsterdam When you join THECUBE, you join a curated, diverse and smart community of scientists, engineers, designers, technologists, artists, futurists and anthropologists. We help our members innovate through our events, innovation labs and one to one mentoring. As a community we actively collaborate to create innovative solutions via our consultancy and independent projects. The physical space is open plan and designed to make you feel calm, focused and happy. We have created a space that is a tool for the 21st century work needs, this means no cubicles, minimum artificial light, art, natural elements and openness. Our story began as a response to the financial crash of 2008; we hypothesised that it was the start of an economic and anthropological pivot. This kind of pivot brings monumental change, which needs a new way of thinking and tools. In 2014 we are starting a series of workshops which will extrapolate tools and intelligence from neuroscience, culture and industrial engineering.thecubelondon.com Mr. and Mrs. Fleming, Step forward to make this Transition Real! by Dr. Maximilian Martin, Founder and Global Managing Director, Impact Economy SA A closed-loop global economy, powered mainly by renewable energy, is the best long-run bet to sustain a projected population of over nine billion people. 2015 will be an interesting year with the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP21) seeking a legally binding, universal agreement on climate, from all nations. If we do not step it up, real progress beyond calls for action will be a challenge though. This is not just because of the re-emergence of political tensions between East and West. We are also still missing the magic recipe and some of its core ingredients. The key question is, how can we get to breakthrough solutions, and deploy them at scale?In spite of the UN conferences, emissions growth has pretty much gone unabated thus far, with the only major dips at the end of the Cold War, when Eastern Europe’s industrial production suddenly collapsed, and during the global financial crisis. Moreover, almost 1.3 billion people do not yet have any access to electricity whatsoever, and 2.7 billion people rely on traditional use of biomass for cooking. Under a business as usual scenario, we are well on our way to 45 Gigatons of energy-related emissions by 2035 (see Figure 1). Figure 1: Global CO2 emissions path 1990-2035 per scenario. (Source: IEA World Energy Outlook 2012) As the year kicks off, let’s be clear: to truly compete, renewable energy will have to become fully price competitive and substitutable with fossil fuels much faster. In other words, if renewables can turn out electricity at a few cents a kilowatt hour, solar panels can capture energy at night, and storage solutions can compete with gasoline in terms of energy density and ability to release energy, then we are talking. Advances in science are key to achieve this. We will need inventors and human ingenuity to come up with the next generation of solutions and bring the remarkable advances in fields such as materials sciences and nanotechnology, information technology, engineering, and other natural sciences to bear on the problem much faster, shortening the innovation cycle. Science fiction? Not necessarily. Just look at the efficiency improvements in solar photovoltaics over the past forty years (see Figure 2). Figure 2: Efficiency improvements in solar photovoltaics, 1975 – 2012 (Source: National Renewable Energy Laboratory) Already today, multi-junction cells allow for a 44.7% conversion efficiency. The fast rise of the efficiency curve of a newer class of materials with a particular crystal structure which is the same as that of CaTiO3 (calcium titanium oxide or ABX3) or ‘perovskite’-after which they are named-is even more exciting: perovskites have a band gap that can be tuned by changing halide content which makes certain materials very good light absorbers over the whole visible solar spectrum. In addition, reported high carrier mobility and long diffusion lengths mean that photo generated charges can travel longer distances, increasing charge absorption and ultimately producing more electricity. And this is not all. For example, using rectifying antennas (or ‘rectennas’), it is already possible to convert conversion electromagnetic radiation to electricity, with reported efficiencies of over 90 percent in the microwave range. This is reminiscent of the solex agitator as depicted in the James Bond movie “The Man with the Golden Gun”, which was released right after the first oil crisis. In principle, physics predicts that it could be possible to also reach these efficiencies in the infrared and optical ranges, i.e., converting sunlight to electricity. Just think about the energy cost and availability implications of high-efficiency solar energy harvesting, leveraging a wide spectrum during the day, and possibly even conducting infrared harvesting at night. Diligently applying science, there are many such possibilities. And they seem less out of the box when we think them through thoroughly. For example, what if wind turbines were routinely coated in ways that would enable them to much better deal with turbulence, so as to produce energy at lower wind speeds and suffer from much less downtime? Again, this is in principle possible, merging design thinking from bionics with advances in materials sciences. After all, birds can do this-and so can we with a little effort. In comparison, new combinations such as Lithium and Sulfur that hold the potential to dramatically raise the energy density of batteries and lower their cost almost seem conventional (though they also need support to reach productization). Notwithstanding, storage continues to be one of the frontiers our inventors need to conquer to render the renewable economy possible. It needs to become much cheaper and better adapted to energy demand patterns (see Figure 3). Figure 3: Battery technology roadmap (Source: Gopalakrishnan, D., Essen, H., Kampman, B., & Grünig, M. (2011). Impacts of Electric Vehicles-Deliverable 2. Assessment of Electric Vehicle and Battery Technology, Delft, CE Delft) As the world of politics gets ready for COP21 in Paris, in 2015 we need to make progress on a key roadblock that stands in the way of a viable energy path forward: the duration of the innovation cycle in science. In solar photovoltaics, it took more than one hundred years from Becquerel’s discovery of the photovoltaic effect in 1839 to Bell Lab unveiling the first usable silicon solar cell in 1954, with a six-percent efficiency. We have gotten better since-but time is not on our side, and we need to keep stepping it up. Google’s $1million “Little Box” challenge calls for a small laptop-sized solar inverter to shrink power conversion technology-because an inverter one-tenth the size of existing devices would make it much easier to bring electricity everywhere where it is needed. To accelerate the process and help to push the boundaries of usable energy solutions, we have created the Exergeia Project. We back potentially groundbreaking inventions and innovations in all fields of alternative energy, including unconventional approaches-including energy efficiency, generation, storage, transmission, and distribution. Nanomaterials for example could make a big contribution to energy conversion and storage. Of course, progress sometimes happens in unexpected ways. When the namesake of the creator of the James Bond character mentioned earlier, Ian Fleming, Sir Alexander Fleming (who was otherwise unrelated), discovered penicillin in 1928, this was after ten years of searching for anti-bacterial agents. But the breakthrough came in a serendipitous fashion. Fleming had just returned from a family holiday-upon departure, he had left his laboratory a bit untidy, stacking all his cultures of staphylococci in one corner, where one culture became contaminated with a fungus while he was vacationing, which then destroyed the colonies of staphylococci immediately surrounding it. It is fortunate for humanity that Fleming was open minded and willing to be surprised, thus recognizing the extraordinary event. The rest is history. It is now time to come up with analogous breakthroughs and make the energy transition real. If you work on something that has the potential to be the next steam engine or Internet, it is time to step forward, and help bring the 100 percent renewable energy economy into view. Mr. and Mrs. Fleming-and colleagues-please step forward! Maximilian Martin, Ph.D. is the founder and global managing director of Impact Economy SA, an impact investment and strategy firm based in Lausanne, Switzerland, and leads the Exergeia Project. The Asian Square Dance – Part 3 By Michael Akerib, Vice-Rector SWISS UMEF UNIVERSITY IndiaIndia is the world’s largest democracy, and one of the few legitimate democracies in Asia showing that, contrary to statements of certain pundits, that democratic concepts can be successfully applied outside the West. Contrary to what is happening in China, its population of 1.2 billion, according to the latest census, continues to grow in spite of the fact that it has the world’s highest infant mortality rates. Its working age population is expected to add another 125 million in the next 10 years. This translates in large capital needs for additional infrastructure, making it dependent on foreign investments to a much larger extent than China. Unless it invests massively in infrastructure, its development will be very much hindered. There is a large imbalance between the genders with a ratio at birth of 914 girls for 100 boys. Life expectancy at birth is of 65 years. Half the population is younger than 18, a quarter is rural and a third lives in extreme poverty. A large proportion of the population is poor, with 50% having no access to electricity. Poverty is not evenly distriuted geographically, with some states considerably poorer than others – a gap widening ever more thus creating the threat of social movements. A Maoist insurgency has already taken hold. Nevertheless, the middle and upper class is forecast to grow from its present figure of 200 million to 1 billion by 2050.Credits: BFA 2010 (ab.eu)Its economy, the world’s third largest and second-fastest growing, should reach USD 25 to 30 trillion by 2050 and could be the world’s third largest after that of the US and China. Some analysts even believe it will be the world’s largest on a PPP basis, reaching USD 86 trillion, in that time horizon. In as much as, contrary to China, its economy is not geared to exports, it is less sensitive to global economic crises. However, it does rely on foreign direct investments to fund its large trade deficit. India’s development hinges on its ability to carry out a number of reforms, and in particular improve its infrastructure and the educational level of its citizens with a concomitant evolution of the population’s mentality away from a mindset embedded in traditions that forbid it from developing into a modern country, and clean up the environmental damage created by an unruly development. The country’s interaction with the other Asian countries remains, however, weak as Pakistan acts as an effective geographical barrier. It fears the strengthening of the China-Pakistan alliance; has no direct access to Central Asian energy producers and mistrusts the US. One of its main oil suppliers is Iran. In spite of these shortcomings, it has been successful in attracting businesses, particularly from Europe, to outsource their manufacturing and services or even to acquire Indian corporations. The country became a nuclear power in the 1990s and is continuing to develop its delivery capacity. Its agreement with the Atomic Energy Agency has created a precedent of allowing the country to have access to nuclear technology without signing the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. It is thus able to divert uranium from civilian to military programs. Military spending makes it the world’s largest buyer of weapons, with Russia as its main supplier. It is believed to have budgeted USD 100 billion for purchases over the next 10 years. It is expanding its naval power, acquiring aircraft carriers and planes to secure shipping lanes for hydrocarbons, just as China is doing. Read alsoThe Asian Square Dance – Part 1 The Asian Square Dance – Part 2 The Future Now Show Shape the future now, where near-future impact counts and visions and strategies for preferred futures start. Do we rise above global challenges? Or do we succumb to them? The Future Now Show explores how we can shape our future now – where near-future impact counts. We showcase strategies and solutions that create futures that work. Every month we roam through current events, discoveries, and challenges – sparking discussion about the connection between today and the futures we’re making – and what we need, from strategy to vision – to make the best ones. The Future Now Show December 2014FeaturingAndreas M. Walker, weiterdenken.ch, Co-President, swissfuture, SwitzerlandNick Price, Creative Business Consultant and Futurist, UKHardy F. Schloer, Owner, Schloer Consulting Group, MalaysiaLise Voldeng, CEO & Chief Creative Officer, Ultra-Agent Industries Inc., Canada / USAPaul Holister, Editor, Summary Text about the Hope Barometer and … How are we doing? If you ask that question of a politician or journalist you will likely get an answer quoting the gross domestic product (GDP), an impersonal metric that someone once derided as a measure of how much we are stealing from the future to sell in the present. So what should we usefully measure? Bhutan introduced “Gross National Happiness” 40 years ago. The Swiss have been indexing fears and worries for 30 years, but they now also have a barometer of hope. How do these measures differ in terms of focus (personal, national, global) and depth, in the sense of being reactive to current events (disasters, terrorist attacks) or founded on fundamental human desires? How do they differ across cultures? A rich topic in which investigation and discussion have only just begun. about Collaborative Networks and …The topic of this show is collaborative networks, which are generally associated with leveraging the internet to work in groups where the members are geographically separated. But the mere existence of social networks like Facebook enables spontaneous collaboration regardless of geographical separation and some activist groups are already using this to great effect. But what are the broader implications of such collaboration? National cultures show strong differences in sentiment, in perception of threats and priorities, and we know that people instinctively behave differently in groups than individually. Will globally connected groups emerge that overshadow national groups or will group sentiments give way to individual sentiments? Will we become more varied or more homogenous, more easily manipulated or more independent in mind and heart, more harmonious or more discordant? about Privacy and …Despite outrage about intrusions of the NSA into our privacy, hordes of us are letting companies like Google ever deeper into our private lives because of the targeted services this enables. Social and work-related discussions increasingly take place in public forums. Do we need to abandon our privacy and accept that our chats, our musings, our lives in general, are open to public view?Would such an evolution lead to a culture of transparency with greater openness? Greater tolerance? Or more mindless mobs? Is it actually a step back, to the days of the village or tribe when everyone knew what everyone else was doing, an environment for which humans evolved and are arguably better adapted to than the more recent civilisation with its anonymity and demigods? February Event: the future of Collective Intelligence The Club of Amsterdam visits London.the future of Collective IntelligenceFebruary 11, 2015Location: The Cube, Studio 5, 155 Commercial Street, London E1 6BJThis is a collaboration between The Cube and the Club of Amsterdam. ContentHow will humanity manage the transition from a human based intelligence to a superior machine intelligence in a constructive, peaceful and practical way?The emergence of Global Intelligence marks the fundamental transition from event-based development and event-based learning to continuous network enabled parallel development and continuous learning, by man, and by machine; simultaneously and complimentary. Similar to aspen trees, where the roots grow for 100s of meter underground, to meet roots of other aspen trees, to exchange information about water and soil conditions, the global networks of machines and its operators begin more and more to understand in real-time the causalities of changes in information streams and react in real-time as well. This process will shape the future more than anything else of the past 1,000 years. One of the most profound changes will be that Intelligence will not be any longer a competitive process, but a complimentary and cooperative process. This will shape, how we govern countries, conduct commerce and manage crisis. with Hardy Schloer, Managing Director, Schloer Consulting Group,Advisory Board, Club of Amsterdam When you join THECUBE, you join a curated, diverse and smart community of scientists, engineers, designers, technologists, artists, futurists and anthropologists. We help our members innovate through our events, innovation labs and one to one mentoring. As a community we actively collaborate to create innovative solutions via our consultancy and independent projects. The physical space is open plan and designed to make you feel calm, focused and happy. We have created a space that is a tool for the 21st century work needs, this means no cubicles, minimum artificial light, art, natural elements and openness. Our story began as a response to the financial crash of 2008; we hypothesised that it was the start of an economic and anthropological pivot. This kind of pivot brings monumental change, which needs a new way of thinking and tools. In 2014 we are starting a series of workshops which will extrapolate tools and intelligence from neuroscience, culture and industrial engineering.thecubelondon.com Mr. and Mrs. Fleming, Step Forward to Make This Energy Transition Real! by Dr. Maximilian Martin, Founder and Global Managing Director, Impact Economy SA A closed-loop global economy, powered mainly by renewable energy, is the best long-run bet to sustain a projected population of over nine billion people. 2015 will be an interesting year with the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP21) seeking a legally binding, universal agreement on climate, from all nations. If we do not step it up, real progress beyond calls for action will be a challenge though. This is not just because of the re-emergence of political tensions between East and West. We are also still missing the magic recipe and some of its core ingredients. The key question is, how can we get to breakthrough solutions, and deploy them at scale? In spite of the UN conferences, emissions growth has pretty much gone unabated thus far, with the only major dips at the end of the Cold War, when Eastern Europe’s industrial production suddenly collapsed, and during the global financial crisis. Moreover, almost 1.3 billion people do not yet have any access to electricity whatsoever, and 2.7 billion people rely on traditional use of biomass for cooking. Under a business as usual scenario, we are well on our way to 45 Gigatons of energy-related emissions by 2035 (see Figure 1). Figure 1: Global CO2 emissions path 1990-2035 per scenario. (Source: IEA World Energy Outlook 2012) As the year kicks off, let’s be clear: to truly compete, renewable energy will have to become fully price competitive and substitutable with fossil fuels much faster. In other words, if renewables can turn out electricity at a few cents a kilowatt hour, solar panels can capture energy at night, and storage solutions can compete with gasoline in terms of energy density and ability to release energy, then we are talking. Advances in science are key to achieve this. We will need inventors and human ingenuity to come up with the next generation of solutions and bring the remarkable advances in fields such as materials sciences and nanotechnology, information technology, engineering, and other natural sciences to bear on the problem much faster, shortening the innovation cycle. Science fiction? Not necessarily. Just look at the efficiency improvements in solar photovoltaics over the past forty years (see Figure 2). Figure 2: Efficiency improvements in solar photovoltaics, 1975 – 2012 (Source: National Renewable Energy Laboratory) Already today, multi-junction cells allow for a 44.7% conversion efficiency. The fast rise of the efficiency curve of a newer class of materials with a particular crystal structure which is the same as that of CaTiO3 (calcium titanium oxide or ABX3) or ‘perovskite’-after which they are named-is even more exciting: perovskites have a band gap that can be tuned by changing halide content which makes certain materials very good light absorbers over the whole visible solar spectrum. In addition, reported high carrier mobility and long diffusion lengths mean that photo generated charges can travel longer distances, increasing charge absorption and ultimately producing more electricity. And this is not all. For example, using rectifying antennas (or ‘rectennas’), it is already possible to convert conversion electromagnetic radiation to electricity, with reported efficiencies of over 90 percent in the microwave range. This is reminiscent of the solex agitator as depicted in the James Bond movie “The Man with the Golden Gun”, which was released right after the first oil crisis. In principle, physics predicts that it could be possible to also reach these efficiencies in the infrared and optical ranges, i.e., converting sunlight to electricity. Just think about the energy cost and availability implications of high-efficiency solar energy harvesting, leveraging a wide spectrum during the day, and possibly even conducting infrared harvesting at night. Diligently applying science, there are many such possibilities. And they seem less out of the box when we think them through thoroughly. For example, what if wind turbines were routinely coated in ways that would enable them to much better deal with turbulence, so as to produce energy at lower wind speeds and suffer from much less downtime? Again, this is in principle possible, merging design thinking from bionics with advances in materials sciences. After all, birds can do this-and so can we with a little effort. In comparison, new combinations such as Lithium and Sulfur that hold the potential to dramatically raise the energy density of batteries and lower their cost almost seem conventional (though they also need support to reach productization). Notwithstanding, storage continues to be one of the frontiers our inventors need to conquer to render the renewable economy possible. It needs to become much cheaper and better adapted to energy demand patterns (see Figure 3). Figure 3: Battery technology roadmap (Source: Gopalakrishnan, D., Essen, H., Kampman, B., & Grünig, M. (2011). Impacts of Electric Vehicles-Deliverable 2. Assessment of Electric Vehicle and Battery Technology, Delft, CE Delft) As the world of politics gets ready for COP21 in Paris, in 2015 we need to make progress on a key roadblock that stands in the way of a viable energy path forward: the duration of the innovation cycle in science. In solar photovoltaics, it took more than one hundred years from Becquerel’s discovery of the photovoltaic effect in 1839 to Bell Lab unveiling the first usable silicon solar cell in 1954, with a six-percent efficiency. We have gotten better since-but time is not on our side, and we need to keep stepping it up. Google’s $1million “Little Box” challenge calls for a small laptop-sized solar inverter to shrink power conversion technology-because an inverter one-tenth the size of existing devices would make it much easier to bring electricity everywhere where it is needed. To accelerate the process and help to push the boundaries of usable energy solutions, we have created the Exergeia Project. We back potentially groundbreaking inventions and innovations in all fields of alternative energy, including unconventional approaches-including energy efficiency, generation, storage, transmission, and distribution. Nanomaterials for example could make a big contribution to energy conversion and storage. Of course, progress sometimes happens in unexpected ways. When the namesake of the creator of the James Bond character mentioned earlier, Ian Fleming, Sir Alexander Fleming (who was otherwise unrelated), discovered penicillin in 1928, this was after ten years of searching for anti-bacterial agents. But the breakthrough came in a serendipitous fashion. Fleming had just returned from a family holiday-upon departure, he had left his laboratory a bit untidy, stacking all his cultures of staphylococci in one corner, where one culture became contaminated with a fungus while he was vacationing, which then destroyed the colonies of staphylococci immediately surrounding it. It is fortunate for humanity that Fleming was open minded and willing to be surprised, thus recognizing the extraordinary event. The rest is history. It is now time to come up with analogous breakthroughs and make the energy transition real. If you work on something that has the potential to be the next steam engine or Internet, it is time to step forward, and help bring the 100 percent renewable energy economy into view. Mr. and Mrs. Fleming-and colleagues-please step forward! Maximilian Martin, Ph.D. is the founder and global managing director of Impact Economy SA, an impact investment and strategy firm based in Lausanne, Switzerland, and leads the Exergeia Project. Club of Amsterdam blog Club of Amsterdam bloghttp://clubofamsterdam.blogspot.com Socratic Designby Humberto Schwab, Philosopher, Owner, Humberto Schwab Filosofia SL, Director, Club of Amsterdam The Ukrainian Dilemma and the Bigger Pictureby Hardy F. Schloer, Owner, Schloer Consulting Group – SCG, Advisory Board of the Club of Amsterdam The impact of culture on educationby Huib Wursten, Senior Partner, itim International andCarel Jacobs is senior consultant/trainer for itim in The Netherlands, he is also Certification Agent for the Educational Sector of the Hofstede Centre. What more demand for meat means for the futureby Christophe Pelletier, The Happy Future Group Consulting Ltd. Inner peace and generosityby Elisabet Sahtouris, Holder of the Elisabet Sahtouris Chair in Living Economies, World Business Academy News about the Future Floating vertical axis offshore wind turbine Spinfloat is a new vertical axis floating wind turbine technology developed by EOLFI Floating wind turbines make it possible to harness the full offshore wind potential as they can be installed in water depths of several hundred meters. Characterized by a vertical axis and pitched blades, Spinfloat displays an enhanced aerodynamic performance and more than 5MW power. Lakes: a significant thermal energy source Using heat from Lake Constance equivalent to the energy produced by one or two nuclear power plants would lead to a change in water temperature of less than 0.2°C, with no appreciable impacts on the ecosystem. This is one of the findings of a recent Eawag study which, for the first time, systematically simulated how lake stratification and water temperatures would be affected by substantial withdrawals of thermal energy in the winter or inputs of cooling water in the summer. Eawag is a world-leading aquatic research institute. Its research, which is driven by the needs of society, provides the basis for innovative approaches and technologies in the water sector. Through close collaboration with experts from industry, government and professional associations, Eawag plays an important bridging role between theory and practice, allowing new scientific insights to be rapidly implemented. Recommended Book Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategiesby Nick Bostrom Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies (2014) is a non-fiction book by Oxford philosophy professor Nick Bostrom. The book argues that if machine brains surpass human brains in general intelligence, then this new superintelligence could replace humans as the dominant lifeform on Earth. Sufficiently intelligent machines could improve their own capabilities faster than human computer scientists. As the fate of the gorillas now depends more on humans than on the actions of the gorillas themselves, so would the fate of humanity depend on the actions of the machine superintelligence. Absent careful pre-planning, the most likely outcome would be catastrophe Syntact – touch the sound Syntact™ – a new musical interface based on the revolutionary technology of non-contact tactile feedback. 121 ultrasonic transducers are focusing acoustic energy into one spatial point, thus creating a tangible vibration in midair. Syntact enables musicians to virtually mold and shape the sound with their hands. It allows easy and playful generation of meaningful and diverse musical structures. The technology behind Syntact provides contact-free tactile feedback to the musician. By utilizing airborne ultrasound a force field is created in mid-air that can be sensed in a tactile way. The interface allows a musician to feel the actual sound with its temporal and harmonic texture. While an optical sensor system is interpreting her or his hand gestures, the musician can physically engage with the medium of sound by virtually molding and shaping it – i.e. changing its acoustic appearance – directly with their hands. Applications Live music creation and performance Virtual reality / telepresence Public interactive multimedia installations in museums, galleries, science centres etc. Interactive advertising Developing the capacity to “See More” is the great adventure of our time By Rosana Agudo, Tecnología para la Transformación Interio We find ourselves facing an unprecedented paradigm shift; never before have human beings had to face such a global challenge. There is much talk of this “Paradigm Shift”, as well as of an “Era Of Change”, and even of a “Change of Era” …, but we begin to quake when we are told that this change means “detaching”, and not only from the need to own material things, it is not only a matter of measures such as “tightening one’s belt” or of “cuts”, that in the end always have to be taken by the most vulnerable social classes. This frightens us because our intuition tells us this change concerns each and every one of us, and that it is so deep at a personal interior level that it is going to break structures of social models (this is already happening) and implies renouncing beliefs that up to now have been felt to be immovable and have been the foundation of our confidence, of our control and even of our identity. And this involves all social strata, all areas and all societies. It is a change of mental model, and brings a widening of vision, of thought, where opposites begin to be seen as complementary and that is good news. A dominant social paradigm is a mental image of social reality that guides a society’s expectations. The dominant mental model in our current social paradigm has, in general terms, the following features: a. It makes the subjective invisible and tries to reduce it to the objective, to be able to measure and handle it, thus impoverishing the variety and wealth of existence and its manifestations. b. It needs to break the universe down into pieces to understand it, while believing the division to be real, and provoking the disconnection of each human being with him- or herself, with all other human beings and with nature, with the dramatic consequences this holds for all. c. It assumes there is nothing beyond what one sees, making it impossible for human beings, men or women, to seek in their interior the key factors that will allow them access to a vision of the world that is deeper, richer and more diverse, as well being simultaneously more unifying and true. The mental level, the mental space, the thought that drives us, that we act on, that we create reality with at this time, is not appropriate to the most advanced being evolving right now on this planet. Human beings evolve through the mind, and the more evolved this is the more subtle, richer and more diverse is the reality it contemplates; and in consequence, the more material and ideas it can use to construct the world it needs to continue on its evolutionary path towards an ever greater perfection of the physical body, the emotions, the mind and the spirit that feeds it. Human beings are finding that they are being pushed to take on the difficult, definitive and pending task of transforming themselves in order to make the transformation possible. We human beings, in spite of our constant talk of “transformation”, of our need to “transform”, do not understand that “transformation” is something that happens in spite of us, in fact the transformation is taking place right now, before our very eyes, even though we cannot see it because of the expectations and assumptions that are an integral part of our mental model, our social and personal paradigm. We human beings can only bring about changes. These successive changes in our way of acting bring about small transformations in our surroundings. However, the profound, voluntary changes in our way of thinking; interior changes that open us up to new logic, bring about transformations that are so important as to give rise to that sought-after, significant social paradigm shift, and even to a change of era. Thought is malleable, but what we have created around it, in the very structure -so perfect and extraordinary- of the mind, what reinforces and strengthens the mental model, is difficult to understand, to detect and finally to demolish. Changing a thought can change reality. That is true; but are we willing to change reality? Or at least are we willing to change a thought? No, if it is trapped in the web of the mental model and we do not know the latter, it is invisible. The mental model reinforces and strengthens itself through the assumptions and the expectations about how things, people and so on should be, and how the outcomes, consequences, relations and so on should be; thus our actions, our being in the world spring from assumptions that give rise to expectations as to how things, relations, business will and should be. We never see the world, reality as it is, but as how we assume it has to or should be, without realizing that in this way we are also “mortgaging” our future, adapting it to the same assumptions. This way things go well or not for me, my life is happy or not, my relationship is satisfactory or not, … depending on whether or not my expectations are met, or even beyond that, the social expectations about it, what is or is not socially accepted in the model. If we reflect on this fact, we realize we only live in the past, the present is hidden from us by the veil of the assumptions about what is or should be, and we prepare our future so that the same expectations are met, either improved or following the same rules that we already know and are “approved” by the model. Thus, we can define the mental model as: the set of assumptions, beliefs and thoughts with which we interpret reality. They make up a filter that translates what we perceive and gives rise to personal experience and, of course, also social experience, as we have already seen. When applied to any area, they are the beliefs, thoughts, assumptions that shape cultures and guide strategies, policies, laws, actions and decisions, while at the same time conditioning and restricting these to strengthening the existing model itself, as mentioned earlier. Now we can begin to understand why it is so difficult for us to be receptive to new fields of thought. We believe it means renouncing so many assumptions, beliefs, truths…. And that it is something that is ours, where our identity lies. However, it is extremely liberating. Once you have lost your fear of abandoning an assumption created by a thought trapped in a certain mental model, once you have stopped being afraid to rid yourself of a belief, the limits disappear and, following that, freedom appears, along with a smile. To teach the mind to free itself, to educate the mind to the logic of interior reflection, to meditation, is pleasant. To get to know the mental model, become aware of it and its workings, is the fastest, most effective and necessary way to bring about real and effective transformations in any field of operation that can take us beyond where we are and make us capable of seeing it. New neuronal connections are made in the brain of those people who have decided to see more. And it is the most extraordinary of adventures; it is the Great Adventure of Our Time to develop the capacity to See More. Futurist Portrait: Ramez Naam Ramez Naam is a Computer Scientist, Futurist & Award-Winning Author. Ramez spent 13 years at Microsoft, where he led teams developing early versions of Microsoft Outlook, Internet Explorer, and the Bing search engine. His career has focused on bringing advanced collaboration, communication, and information retrieval capabilities to roughly one billion people around the world, and took him to the role of Partner and Director of Program Management within Microsoft, with deep experience leading teams working on cutting edge technologies such as machine learning, search, massive scale services, and artificial intelligence. Between stints at Microsoft, Ramez founded and ran Apex NanoTechnologies, the world’s first company devoted entirely to software tools to accelerate molecular design. He holds 19 patents related to search engines, information retrieval, web browsing, artificial intelligence, and machine learning. Naam currently holds a seat on the advisory board of the Acceleration Studies Foundation, is a member of the World Future Society, a Senior Associate of the Foresight Institute, and a fellow of the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies. He is the author of More Than Human: Embracing the promise of biological enhancement, which reviews new technologies and makes a case for embracing human enhancement, showing readers how new technologies are powerful new tools in humanity’s quest to improve ourselves, our offspring and our world. Naam began publishing science fiction in 2012, with Nexus, from Angry Robot Books. It centers around an experimental nano-drug by that name. Nexus won the 2014 Prometheus Award. The sequel was Crux. In 2013, Naam published The Infinite Resource: The Power of Ideas on a Finite Planet.Quotes“We must learn to set our emotions aside and embrace what science tells us.” The Next 10 Years: Everything Is Connected Agenda Watch The Future Now Show! Season Events 2014 / 2015 NEXT EventUKFebruary 11, 2015the future of Collective IntelligenceLocation: The Cube, Studio 5, 155 Commercial Street, London E1 6BJThis is a collaboration between The Cube and the Club of Amsterdam. LondonApril 24, 2015the future of Metro VitalityLocation: ARUP LondonA collaboration between the Association of Professional Futurists and the Club of Amsterdam and hosted by ARUP Foresight + Research + Innovation. Special Supporters printable version
Content 2013-14 State of the FutureThe Future Now Show February Event in London: the future of Collective Intelligence The Asian Square Dance – Part 4Club of Amsterdam blogNews about the FutureRecommended Book: Social Collective Intelligence: Combining the Powers of Humans and Machines to Build a Smarter Society The War PrayerFuturist Portrait: Marina Gorbis Agenda Special supporters Club of Amsterdam SearchSubmit your articleContactSubscribe Welcome to the Club of Amsterdam Journal. In this show we are talking about Governance for All / Philosophy unbound / Robotics and A.I. and … featuring Karin Jironet, Markus Petz, Katie Aquino, aka “Miss Metaverse”, Annegien Blokpoel and Paul Holister The Future Now Show …. and join our event in London about the future of Collective Intelligence, Wednesday, February 11, 7-9pm.With Hardy Schloer about:How will humanity manage the transition from a human based intelligence to a superior machine intelligence in a constructive, peaceful and practical way? Felix F Bopp, Founder & Chairman 2013-14 State of the Future By Jerome C. Glenn, Theodore J. Gordon, and Elizabeth Florescu. The Millennium Project Executive Summary The global situation for humanity continues to improve in general, but at the expense of the environment. People around the world are becoming healthier, wealthier, better educated, more peaceful, and increasingly connected, and they are living longer. The child mortality rate has dropped 47% since 1990, extreme poverty in the developing world fell from 50% in 1981 to 21% in 2010, primary school completion rates grew from 81% in 1990 to 91% in 2011, only one transborder war occurred in 2013, nearly 40% of humanity is connected via the Internet, and life expectancy has increased ten years over the past twenty years to reach 70.5 years today. However, water tables are falling on all continents, intrastate conflicts and refugee numbers are increasing, glaciers are melting, income gaps are increasingly obscene, coral reefs are dying, ocean acidity is increasing, ocean dead zones have doubled every decade since the 1960s, half the world’s topsoil has been destroyed, youth unemployment has reached dangerous proportions, traffic jams and air pollution are strangling cities, $1–1.6 trillion is paid in bribes, organized crime takes in twice the money per year as all military budgets combined, civil liberties are increasingly threatened, and half of the world is potentially unstable. Massive transitions from isolated subsistence agriculture and industrial economies to an emerging global Internet–connected pluralistic civilization are occurring at unprecedented speed and uncertainties. Monitoring major indicators of progress from health and education to water and energy shows we are winning more than we are losing — but where we are losing is very serious. After seventeen years of continuous monitoring of global change as documented in the annual State of the Future reports, it is clear that humanity has the ideas and resources to address its global challenges, but it has not yet shown the leadership, policies, and management on the scale necessary to guarantee a better future. It is also clear from The Millennium Project’s global futures research over all these years that there is greater agreement about how to build a better future than is evident in the one-way media that holds audiences by the drama of disagreement, which is reinforcing polarization. When you consider the many wrong decisions and good decisions not taken — day after day and year after year around the world — it is amazing that we are still making as much progress as we are. The IMF expects the global economy to grow from 3% in 2013 to 3.7% during 2014 and possibly 3.9% in 2015. With world population of 7.2 billion growing at 1.1% in 2013, the global per capita income is increasing at 2.6% per year. The world is reducing poverty faster than many thought was possible, but the divide between the rich and poor is growing faster than many want to admit. According to Oxfam, the total wealth of the richest 85 people equals that of 3.6 billion people in the bottom half of the world’s economy, and half of the world’s wealth is owned by just 1% of the population. We need to continue the successful efforts that are reducing poverty, but we also need to focus far more seriously on reducing income inequality if long-term instability is to be avoided. Because the world is better educated and increasingly connected, people are becoming less tolerant of the abuse of elite power than in the past. Because youth unemployment is growing, more people have more time to do something about this abuse. Unless these elites open the conversation about the future with the rest of their populations, unrest and revolutions are likely to continue and increase. The executive summary of the 2008 State of the Future stated: Half the world is vulnerable to social instability and violence due to rising food and energy prices, failing states, falling water tables, climate change, decreasing water-food-energy supply per person, desertification, and increasing migrations due to political, environmental, and economic conditions. Unfortunately, these factors contributing to social instability have continued to worsen over the past five years, leading to the social unrest we see today in many parts of the world. The number of wars and battlerelated deaths has been decreasing, however. Yet worrisome territorial tensions among Asian countries continue to slowly escalate, cyber attacks and espionage are rapidly increasing, and overlapping jurisdictions for energy access to the melting Arctic will be tests of humanity’s maturity to see if these can be peacefully resolved. The US and Russia argue about how to stop the bloodshed in Syria while a third of Syria’s 21 million people are displaced in their country or refugees in neighboring countries. The number of nuclear weapons is falling and nation-state transborder wars are rare, yet conflicts within countries are increasing, and the world ignores 6 million war-related deaths in the Congo. At the same time, the world is increasingly engaged in many diverse conversations about the right way to relate to the environment and our fellow humans and about what technologies, economics, and laws are right for our common future. These great conversations are emerging from countless international negotiations, the evolution of standards established by the ISO, the preparations for the post-2015 UN Development Goals and other UN gatherings, and thousands of Internet discussion groups and big data analyses. Humanity is slowly but surely becoming aware of itself as an integrated system of cultures, economies, technologies, natural and built environments, and governance systems. These great conversations will be better informed if we realize that the world is improving better than most pessimists know and that future dangers are worse than most optimists indicate. Better ideas, new tech, and creative management approaches are popping up all over the world, but the lack of imagination and courage to make serious change is drowning the innovations needed to make the world work for all. Meanwhile, the world is beginning to automate jobs more broadly and quickly than during the industrial revolution and initial stages of the information age. How many truck and taxicab drivers will future self-driving cars replace? How many will lose their jobs to robotic manufacturing? Or telephone support people to AI telephone systems? The number of employees per business revenue is falling, giving rise to employment-less economic growth. New possibilities have to be invented, such as one-person Internet-based self-employment, for finding markets worldwide rather than looking for local jobs. Successfully leapfrogging slower linear development processes in lower-income countries is likely to require implementing futuristic possibilities — from 3D printing to seawater agriculture — and making increasing individual and collective intelligence a national objective of each country. The explosive, accelerating growth of knowledge in a rapidly changing and increasingly interdependent world gives us so much to know about so many things that it seems impossible to keep up. At the same time, we are flooded with so much trivial news that serious attention to serious issues gets little interest, and too much time is wasted going through useless information. The Millennium Project has gathered the insights from creative and knowledgeable people around the world to identify and update prospects for 15 Global Challenges to provide a framework for understanding what is important to know about global change. Chapter 1 presents distilled overviews of each of these challenges so that readers can save time and more easily improve their understanding of our common future compared with more narrowly focused sources scattered around the Internet. Chapter 1 is continually updated online in the Global Futures Intelligence System GFIS can be thought of as a global information utility from which different readers can draw different value for improving understanding and decisions. In addition to succinct but relatively detailed descriptions of the current situation and forecasts, recommendations to address each challenge are also included. Some examples suggested in Chapter 1 include: Establish a U.S.-China 10-year environmental security goal to reduce climate change and improve trust. Grow meat without growing animals, to reduce water demand and GHG emissions. Develop seawater agriculture for biofuels, carbon sink, and food without rain. Build global collective intelligence systems for input to long-range strategic plans. Create tele-nations connecting brains overseas to the development process back home. Establish trans-institutions for more effective implementation of strategies. Detail and implement a global counter-organized crime strategy. Use the State of the Future Index as an alternative to GDP as a measure of progress for the world and nations. The world is in a race between implementing ever-increasing ways to improve the human condition and the seemingly ever-increasing complexity and scale of global problems. So, how is the world doing in this race? What’s the score so far? A review of the trends of the 30 variables used in The Millennium Project’s global State of the Future Index (see Box 1) provides a score card on humanity’s performance in addressing the most important challenges. The State of the Future Index is a measure of the 10-year outlook for the future based on historical data for the last 20 years. It is constructed with key variables and forecasts that, in the aggregate, depict whether the future promises to be better or worse. The SOFI is intended to show the directions and intensity of change and to identify the factors responsible. It provides a mechanism for studying the relationships among the items in a system. It has been produced by The Millennium Project since 2000. The variables included in SOFI were selected from a set of indicators rated by an international Delphi panel for their capacity for showing progress or regress on the 15 Global Challenges and the availability of at least 20 years of reliable historical data. The variables were submitted several times to an international panel selected by The Millennium Project’s Nodes to forecast the best and worst values for each variable in 10 years. These were used for the normalization and integration of all the variables into a single index (See “State of the Future Index” in GFIS’s Research section for details of the construction of SOFI, annual global SOFIs since 2001, and several national applications.) and for computation of the State of the Future Index. The index shown in Figure 1 indicates a slower progress since 2007, although the overall outlook is promising. The World Report Card Each of the 30 variables can be examined to show where we are winning, where we are losing, and where there is unclear or little progress, producing a report card for the world. Figures 2, 3, and 4 show the indicators with their historical data and projections grouped by progress criterion. Box 1.Variables used in the 2013–14 State of the Future Index 1. GNI per capita, PPP (constant 2005 international $)2. Economic income inequality (share of top 10%)3. Unemployment, total (% of world labor force)4. Poverty headcount ratio at $1.25 a day (PPP) (% of population)5. Levels of corruption (0=highly corrupt; 6=very clean)6. Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current $, billions)7. R&D Expenditures (% of GDP)8. Population growth (annual %)9. Life expectancy at birth (years)10. Mortality rate, infant (per 1,000 live births)11. Prevalence of undernourishment12. Health expenditure per capita (current $)13. Physicians (per 1,000 people)14. Improved water source (% of population with access)15. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (thousand cubic meters)16. Ecological Footprint / Biocapacity ratio17. Forest area (% of land area)18. CO2emissions from fossil fuel and cement production (billion tones (GtCO2))19. Energy efficiency (GDP per unit of energy use (constant 2005 PPP $ per kg of oil equivalent))20. Electricity production from renewable sources, excluding hydroelectric (% of total)21. Literacy rate, adult total (% of people ages 15 and above)22. School enrollment, secondary (% gross)23. Number of wars (conflicts with more than 1,000 fatalities)24. Terrorism incidents25. Number of countries and groups that had or still have intentions to build nuclear weapons26. Freedom rights (number of countries rated free)27. Voter turnout (% voting population)28. Proportion of seats held by women in national parliaments (% of members)29. Internet users (per 100 people)30. Prevalence of HIV (% of population age 15 and 49) Some Factors to ConsiderA great brain race has begun! The EU, U.S., Japan, and China have announced programs to understand how the brain works and apply that knowledge for better computers and to improve our relation to them. Google also is working to create artificial brains to be your personal artificial intelligence assistant. Another great race is on to make supercomputer power available to the masses with advances in IBM’s Watson and with cloud computing by Amazon and others. About 85% of the world’s population is expected to be covered by high–speed mobile Internet in 2017. China already has nearly twice as many Internet users as the entire population of the U.S., and 81% of its Internet users gain access via mobile phones. Over 8 billion devices are connected to the “Internet of Things,” which is expected to grow to 40–80 billion devices by 2020. According to the ITU, nearly 40% of humanity uses the Internet now. The global nervous system of humanity is nearing completion, making a de facto global brain(s) of humanity — partly by design and partly spontaneously. So what happens when the entire world has access to nearly all the world’s knowledge and instantaneous access to artificial brains able to solve problems and create new conditions like geniuses, while blurring previous distinctions between virtual realities and physical reality? We have already seen brilliant financial experts augmented with data and software making short–term, selfish, economic decisions that led to the 2008 global financial crisis, continued environmental degradation, and widening income disparities. It is not yet clear that humanity will grow from adolescent short–term, me–first thinking to more adult longer–term, we–first planet–oriented decisionmaking. Humanity seems to be evolving from ideologically driven central decisionmaking to more decentralized pragmatic evidence–based decisionmaking. Yet multi–way interactive media that is one of the greatest forces for good also attracts individuals with common interests into isolated ideological groups, reinforcing social polarization and conflict and forcing some political systems into gridlock. Humanity may become more responsible and compassionate as the Internet of people and things grows across the planet, making us more aware of humanity as a whole and of our natural and built environments. It also makes it increasingly difficult for conventional crimes to go undetected. Unfortunately, cyberspace has become the new media for new kinds of crimes. According to Akamai, there were 628 cyber–attacks over 24 hours on July 24, 2013, with majority targeting the U.S. Cyber–attacks can be thought of as a new kind of guerrilla warfare. Prevention may just be an endless intellectual arms race of hacking and counter–hacking software, setting cyber traps, exposing sources, and initiating trade sanctions. Although the long–range trend toward democracy is strong, Freedom House reports that world political and civil liberties deteriorated for the eighth consecutive year in 2013, with declines noted in 54 countries and improvements in just 40 countries. At the same time, increasing numbers of educated and mobile phone Internet–savvy people are no longer tolerating the abuse of power and may be setting the stage for a long and difficult transition to more global democracy. Meanwhile, the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change found that greenhouse gases grew from an average of 1.3% per year between 1970 and 2000 to an average of 2.2% between 2000 and 2010. Each decade of the past three was warmer than the previous decade. The past 30 years was likely the warmest period in the northern hemisphere in the last 1,400 years. Even if all CO2 emissions are stopped today, the IPCC report notes that “most aspects of climate change will persist for many centuries.” Hence, the world has to take adaptation far more seriously, in addition to reducing GHG emissions by better conservation, higher efficiencies, changes in food and energy production, and new methods to reduce the GHGs that are already inthe atmosphere. Without dramatic changes, UNEP projects a 2°C (3.6°F) rise above pre–industrial levels in 20–30 years, accelerating changing climate, ocean acidity, changes in disease patters, and saltwater intrusions into freshwater areas worldwide. FAO reports that 87% of global fish stocks are either fully exploited or overexploited. Typhoon Haiyan that devastated the Philippines in November 2013 had gusts reaching 235 miles per hour and a storm surge of water swelling as high as 20 feet, making it the most powerful tropical storm on record to make landfall. Oceans absorb about 33% of human–generated CO2, but their ability to continue doing this is being reduced, with changing acidity and dying coral reefs and other living systems. In just 36 years (by 2050) the world needs to create enough electrical production capacity for an additional 3.7 billion people. There are 1.2 billion people without electricity today (17% of the world), and an additional 2.4 billion people will be added to the world’s population between now and 2050. Compounding this is the requirement to decommission aging nuclear power plants and to replace or retrofit fossil fuel plants. The cost of nuclear power is increasing, while the cost of renewables is falling. Wind power passed nuclear as Spain’s leading source of electricity. However, fossil fuels (coal, oil, and natural gas) will continue to supply the vast majority of baseload electricity past 2050 unless there are major social and technological changes. About 3 billion people still rely on traditional biomass for cooking and heating. If the long–term trends toward a wealthier and more sophisticated world continue, our energy demands by 2050 could be more than expected. However, the convergences of technologies are accelerating rapidly to make energy efficiencies far greater by 2050 than forecast today. Because of falling water tables around the world, climate change, various forms of water pollution, and an additional 2.4 billion people in just 36 years (the majority in Asia), some of the people with safe water today may not have it in the future unless significant changes are made. Major progress was made over the past 25 years that provided enough clean water for an additional 2 billion people, but then water tables were higher, climate change was slower, and pollution was less. According to the OECD, half the world could be living in areas with severe water stress by 2030. The UN’s mid–range forecast is that the current 7.2 billion people will grow to 9.6 billion by 2050 and there will be as many people over 65 as under 15, requiring new concepts of retirement or work. Average life expectancy at birth has increased from 48 years in 1955 to 70.5 years today. Future scientific and medical breakthroughs could give people longer and more productive lives than most would believe possible today. For example, uses of genetic data, software, and nanotechnology will help detect and treat disease at the genetic or molecular level. As a result, people will work longer and create many forms of tele–work, reducing the economic burden on younger generations and maintaining a better quality of life. In the meantime, because people are living longer, health care costs are increasing, and the shortage of health workers is growing, telemedicine and self–diagnosis via biochip sensors and online expert systems will be increasingly necessary. The continued acceleration of S&T is fundamentally changing what is possible, and access to this knowledge is becoming universally available. But little news coverage, educational curricula, or the general public who elect political leaders seem aware of the extraordinary changes and consequences that need to be discussed. For example, China’s Tianhe–2 supercomputer is the world’s fastest computer at 33.86 petaflops (quadrillion floating point operations per second) — passing the computational speed of a human brain (though not its cognitive abilities). Individual gene sequencing is available for $1,000 that will lead to individual genetic medicine, while human pancreatic cells have been changed into liver cells and skin cells into heart cells. Synthetic biology is creating new life forms from computer designs. Nano–scale robots are being developed that should be able to manage nano–scale building processes for novel materials. A Higgs–like particle has been discovered that could explain the fundamental ability of particles to acquire mass. Quantum entanglement of billions of particle pairs could revolutionize communications and possibly transportation, and quantum building blocks (qubits) have been embedded into nanowires to lead to quantum computers. Although seemingly remote from improving the human condition, such basic science is necessary to increase the knowledge that applied science and technology draws on to improve the human condition. Yet the acceleration of scientific and technological change seems to grow beyond conventional means of ethical evaluation. Is it ethical to clone ourselves, to bring dinosaurs back to life, or to invent thousands of new life forms through synthetic biology? Is it ethical to implement new S&T developments without proper safety testing or to develop new forms of weapons without human control over their use and safe disposal? Should basic scientific research be pursued without direct regard for social issues and the society that funds it? Might social considerations impair progress toward a truthful understanding of reality? Since journalists have to “hype” to be read in such an information-noisy world, truth can be distorted, resulting in a cynical public. We need a global collective intelligence system to track S&T advances, forecast consequences, and document a range of views so that all can understand the potential consequences of new and possible future S&T. Although the empowerment of women has been one of the strongest drivers of social evolution over the past century, violence against women is the largest war today, as measured by death and casualties per year. Globally, 35% of women have experienced physical and/or sexual violence, and 38% of all murders of women are committed by intimate partners. While the gender gaps for health and educational attainment were closed by 96% and 93% respectively, according to the 2013 Global Gender Gap by the World Economic Forum, the gap in economic participation has been closed by only 60% and the gap in political outcomes by only 21% globally. Women account for 21.3% of the membership of national legislative bodies worldwide, up from 11.3% in 1997. It is not reasonable to expect the world to cooperatively create and implement strategies to build a better future without some general agreement about what that desirable future is. Such a future should not be built on unrealistic fantasies unaware of the global situation. It should also be aware of the extraordinary possibilities. The overviews of the 15 Global Challenges in Chapter 1 gives a framework for understanding the current situation and prospects that have been systematically updated over the past seventeen years and with the accumulative participation of over 4,500 creative and knowledgeable people. The Global Challenges can be used as input to strategic development processes and university courses and can help the general public to understand what is important about future possibilities. This work is continuously updated with much greater detail in the Global Futures Intelligence System at www.themp.org. Chapter 2, Hidden Hunger: Unhealthy Food Markets in the Developing World, shares an international assessment of the causes of and solutions to the increasing problem of hidden hunger: the intake of sufficient calories but with little nutritious value, vitamins, and minerals. Although the share of people in the world who are hungry has fallen from over 30% in 1970 (when world population was 3.7 billion) to 15% today (with world population at over 7 billion) — the vast majority of whom are in Africa and Asia — concerns are increasing over the variety and nutritional quality of food. FAO estimates that some 30% of the population (2 billion people) suffers from hidden hunger. Some researchers argue that industrial agriculture reduces the nutrient content of crops, thus escalating the risk of hidden hunger. The International Food Policy Research Institute’s Global Hunger Index report notes that many of the unhealthy food conditions in the developing world are related to poor government social policies, income inequalities, inefficient farming, post–traumatic stress following civil wars, and the low status and educational level of women.Chapter 3, Vulnerable Natural Infrastructure in Urban Coastal Zones, shares an international assessment of the causes of and solutions to the increasing deterioration of the natural infrastructure along the urban coastal zones around the world. This deterioration diminishes nature’s ability to reduce the impacts of hurricanes, tsunamis, and pollution, as it also negatively affects ecosystem services essential to livelihood. Over half the people in the world live within 120 miles of a coastline. Hence, without appropriate mitigation, prevention, and management of the natural infrastructure within urban coastal zones, billions of people will be increasingly vulnerable to a range of disasters. Chapter 4, SIMAD and Lone Wolf Terrorism Prospects and Potential Strategies to Address the Threat, shares an international assessment of the increasingly destructive power of individuals acting alone. The number of terrorism incidents increased over the past 20 years, reaching 8,441 in 2012 and more than 5,000 in the first half of 2013. Of all terrorism, the lone wolf type is the most insidious, because it is exceedingly difficult to anticipate, given the actions and intent of individuals acting alone. The average opinion of the international panel participating in this study is that nearly a quarter of terrorist attacks carried out in 2015 might be by a lone wolf and that the situation might escalate: about half of the participants in the study thought that lone wolf terrorists might attempt to use weapons of mass destruction around 2030. Chapter 5, Global Futures Intelligence System, explains an approach to bringing important information about the future together with expert judgments and decision support software in new structures for continuous updating and improvements to create collective intelligence and wisdom about the future. Throughout Chapter 1, references are made to GFIS as the online location at www.themp.org for more detailed information on a subject that is continually updated. Each of the 15 Global Challenges features a menu that includes the following: both a short and a detailed report; a situation chart of the present and desired situation, as well as potential policies for progress; news aggregated from selected RSS feeds; a scanning system with annotated information; and key related web resources, books, papers, models, discussions, questionnaires, and lists of edits to these items. The collective intelligence emerges in GFIS from synergies among data/information/knowledge, software/hardware, and experts and others with insight that continually learn from feedback to produce just–in–time knowledge for better decisions than any of these elements acting alone. Figure 6 is a graphic illustration of these interactive elements. The accelerating rates of changes discussed in the State of the Future will eventually connect humanity and technology into new kinds of decisionmaking with global real–time feedback. GFIS is an early expression of that future direction, as is the 2013–14 State of the Future. You can get the full report at 2013-14 State of the Future The Future Now Show : Digital Startups from Asia / Innovating in Emerging Economies Shape the future now, where near-future impact counts and visions and strategies for preferred futures start. Do we rise above global challenges? Or do we succumb to them? The Future Now Show explores how we can shape our future now – where near-future impact counts. We showcase strategies and solutions that create futures that work. Every month we roam through current events, discoveries, and challenges – sparking discussion about the connection between today and the futures we’re making – and what we need, from strategy to vision – to make the best ones. The Future Now ShowFebruary 2015about Governance for All / Philosophy unbound / Robotics and A.I. and … FeaturingKatie Aquino aka “Miss Metaverse”, Futurista™, USAKarin Jironet, Co-founder of In Claritas, the NetherlandsMarkus Petz, Head of Special Projects & Development, Experience Alternative Tampere, AustriaAnnegien Blokpoel, Founder & CEO, PerspeXo, the NetherlandsPaul Holister, Editor, Summary Text about Governance for All and … The westernised world seems to be living in a state of increasing fear, with many believing we face a clash of civilisations. On one side our cherished democratic ways and on the other, it seems, a rigid, hierarchical (religious) force hell-bent on destroying us. Is there an outlook that is more inclusive of the differences and would we even see it in this polarised climate (which the Hebdo attack may have been intended to worsen)? Might causes of the clash be going unrecognised, like blowback from things we have done in their countries. Does our fear maybe even stem from insecurity inflicted on ourselves by globalisation? When the very nature and causes of the situation are so clouded, how do you decide on a direction? about Philosophy unbound and … Philosophy unbound is a group trying to reclaim philosophy from stuffy academia and bring it alive for people in something akin to the underground music scene. (Imagine your teenage daughter of a Saturday night saying “Dad, I’m going to a philosophy gig in town tonight. I might be home late.”) By keeping it practical, relevant to people’s lives and participative, the hope is that it will spread widely. Will it? What broader impact might it have? And if you want to get really speculative, how would it look with the involvement of enhanced humans or artificial intelligences? about Robotics and A.I. and … Computing power is growing exponentially, and technological advance is accelerating – maybe also exponentially. There is no obvious reason this will stop. Look far enough ahead – and given the nature of exponential growth that might not be so far – and our future offers artificial intelligences that make us look puny, the possibility of humans merging with said intelligences and wild ideas like uploading our consciousness into immortal machines that could head out to the stars, unfettered by the frailty of human bodies. But what is to stop an elite few from taking the spoils and leaving the rest of us behind? We keep losing jobs to machines and this won’t stop so why are working hours and the retirement age going up? A classic utopia vs dystopia discussion seems in order. Which way are we leaning? February Event in London: the future of Collective Intelligence The Club of Amsterdam visits London.the future of Collective Intelligence February 11, 2015, 7-9pmLocation: The Cube, Studio 5, 155 Commercial Street, London E1 6BJThis is a collaboration between The Cube and the Club of Amsterdam Content How will humanity manage the transition from a human based intelligence to a superior machine intelligence in a constructive, peaceful and practical way?The emergence of Global Intelligence marks the fundamental transition from event-based development and event-based learning to continuous network enabled parallel development and continuous learning, by man, and by machine; simultaneously and complimentary. Similar to aspen trees, where the roots grow for 100s of meter underground, to meet roots of other aspen trees, to exchange information about water and soil conditions, the global networks of machines and its operators begin more and more to understand in real-time the causalities of changes in information streams and react in real-time as well. This process will shape the future more than anything else of the past 1,000 years. One of the most profound changes will be that Intelligence will not be any longer a competitive process, but a complimentary and cooperative process. This will shape, how we govern countries, conduct commerce and manage crisis. with Hardy Schloer, Managing Director, Schloer Consulting Group,Advisory Board, Club of Amsterdam When you join THECUBE, you join a curated, diverse and smart community of scientists, engineers, designers, technologists, artists, futurists and anthropologists. We help our members innovate through our events, innovation labs and one to one mentoring. As a community we actively collaborate to create innovative solutions via our consultancy and independent projects. The physical space is open plan and designed to make you feel calm, focused and happy. We have created a space that is a tool for the 21st century work needs, this means no cubicles, minimum artificial light, art, natural elements and openness. Our story began as a response to the financial crash of 2008; we hypothesised that it was the start of an economic and anthropological pivot. This kind of pivot brings monumental change, which needs a new way of thinking and tools. In 2014 we are starting a series of workshops which will extrapolate tools and intelligence from neuroscience, culture and industrial engineering.thecubelondon.com The Asian Square Dance – Japan By Michael Akerib, Vice-Rector SWISS UMEF UNIVERSITY JapanJapan’s population of 127 million, of which nearly a quarter is over 65, is on a long-term downward trend, and is expected to lose one third of its inhabitants by 2050 and by two thirds in 2100. It has the world’s longest life expectancy and the lowest child mortality rate. The aging population translates into a population that is rapidly both aging and shrinking. Labor availability is already an issue particularly considering the historical reluctance of integrating immigrants – foreigners account for only 2% of the population. An aging population is also synonymous with lower prices for land and a lowering of real wages thus creating a strong deflationary pressure. Facilitating entry into the employment market for women is an unpopular measure and will most probably result in an even lower birth rate than the present 1.47. Possibly Japanese industry will increase its reliance on robots. The country suffers from other woes: natural disasters, deflation, and an increasingly uneasy relationship with China. Credits: BFA 2010 (ab.eu) Japanese corporations have made major investments in Asia, to be present in these markets as they expand, but also to take advantage of lower labor costs. This has reduced the dependence of Japanese corporations on the yen, a traditionally strong currency. Japan, together with the US, is the largest shareholder of the Asian Development Bank in which there is a Japan Special Fund. Under Prime Minister Abe, and in contradiction with the cultural concept of sakoku or isolationism from the rest of the world, the country has been eager to create an arc of freedom and prosperity extending from Japan through South East and South Asia to the Middle East. This is viewed with alarm by both China and Russia that sees it as a means of containing them. In Asia, generally, Japan is a partner co-opted reluctantly as memories of World War II are still vivid and Japan, no longer wanting to be apologetic about that part of history, is reviving these painful memories. Japan wants to have friendly relations with other countries in the area so as to counterbalance the rise of China. Thus, it has recently agreed to a security alliance with Australia, and is working at improving its relations with India, Russia and South Korea, the latter being a country in which Japanese are simply hated. The limitation is essentially budgetary as Japan’s economy will face large challenges in the coming years and may no longer be able to sustain its place as the world’s second largest economy. Its ranking by GDP per capita has already decreased from the 4th to the 20th rank in fifteen years and its share of world GDP is only 10% as against 18% in the mid-1990s. The country has a large sovereign debt. Over a quarter of GDP is spent on health and nursery care and family benefits. Prime Minister Abe wants to delete Article 9 of the constitution which prohibits war as a foreign policy instrument and does not allow the country to have an army and thus gain a larger independence from the US. It raises the issue of a possible nuclearization of the country’s military. Indeed, Japan has undoubtedly the technological capabilities of building a nuclear weapon. It sees itself threated by the rise of China, the nuclear ambitions of North Korea, and is uneasy about its dependency on the US, wondering if the US public opinion would still, after the Iraqi fiasco, and the non-intervention in Georgia and the Ukraine, let its forces engage in foreign combat activities. The government, however, is well aware that if it does not develop nuclear weapons, it would instill even greater distrust among its Asian partners and may well start a race to the bomb in South Korea and Taiwan. Japan spends a larger budget on the military than China does, and its naval power is considerable. Investments are made in high-technology weaponry and in particular satellite observation and submarine detection. It is expected to spend USD 240 billion on items including aircraft and amphibious landing ships. Japan is integrated in the US-led Theater Missile Defense System, is considered to have the world’s third best army, thus considerably reducing the possible threats that China could exercise in the region. It has also announced the development of satellite capabilities in liaison with the US. It has recently created a Ministry of Defense. In December 2007, its Navy successfully tested n American anti-missile system. Four such interception systems are included in the defense setup. While officially their purpose is to protect Japan from North Korean missiles, they play an important part in the defense of Taiwan should China attempt an invasion. Japan, as well as the US, have repeatedly stated that they would not stand still should China decide to invade the island state. Read alsoThe Asian Square Dance – Part 1 The Asian Square Dance – Part 2: China The Asian Square Dance – Part 3: India Club of Amsterdam blog Club of Amsterdam bloghttp://clubofamsterdam.blogspot.com Socratic Designby Humberto Schwab, Philosopher, Owner, Humberto Schwab Filosofia SL, Director, Club of Amsterdam The Ukrainian Dilemma and the Bigger Pictureby Hardy F. Schloer, Owner, Schloer Consulting Group – SCG, Advisory Board of the Club of Amsterdam The impact of culture on educationby Huib Wursten, Senior Partner, itim International andCarel Jacobs is senior consultant/trainer for itim in The Netherlands, he is also Certification Agent for the Educational Sector of the Hofstede Centre. What more demand for meat means for the futureby Christophe Pelletier, The Happy Future Group Consulting Ltd. Inner peace and generosityby Elisabet Sahtouris, Holder of the Elisabet Sahtouris Chair in Living Economies, World Business Academy News about the Future International Year of Light 2015 The International Year of Light and Light-based Technologies 2015 is a global initiative adopted by the United Nations to raise awareness of how optical technologies promote sustainable development and provide solutions to worldwide challenges in energy, education, agriculture, communications and health. Youth Employment report IFTF and The Rockefeller Foundation announce the release of the Future of Youth Employment report. The report offers an in-depth look at the changing nature of work in the United States — from microwork, to new coordination and automation technologies, and beyond. The report explores challenges and opportunities these changes present for poor and vulnerable youth, and suggests policies and actions corporations, governments, and nonprofits can take to ensure positive futures for them. In 2013, 22.5% of workers aged 16-19 were unemployed, compared to 5.1% of workers aged 55-64. The youth unemployment epidemic has no easy solution; the disruptions emerging today can either exacerbate the problem, or we can harness them to improve the lives of young people. Recommended Book Social Collective Intelligence: Combining the Powers of Humans and Machines to Build a Smarter Societyby Daniele Miorandi (Editor), Vincenzo Maltese (Editor), Michael Rovatsos (Editor), Anton Nijholt (Editor), James Stewart (Editor) The book focuses on Social Collective Intelligence, a term used to denote a class of socio-technical systems that combine, in a coordinated way, the strengths of humans, machines and collectives in terms of competences, knowledge and problem solving capabilities with the communication, computing and storage capabilities of advanced ICT. Social Collective Intelligence opens a number of challenges for researchers in both computer science and social sciences; at the same time it provides an innovative approach to solve challenges in diverse application domains, ranging from health to education and organization of work. The book will provide a cohesive and holistic treatment of Social Collective Intelligence, including challenges emerging in various disciplines (computer science, sociology, ethics) and opportunities for innovating in various application areas. By going through the book the reader will gauge insight and knowledge into the challenges and opportunities provided by this new, exciting, field of investigation. Benefits for scientists will be in terms of accessing a comprehensive treatment of the open research challenges in a multidisciplinary perspective. Benefits for practitioners and applied researchers will be in terms of access to novel approaches to tackle relevant problems in their field. Benefits for policy-makers and public bodies representatives will be in terms of understanding how technological advances can support them in supporting the progress of society and economy. The War Prayer A personal introduction to Mark Twain’s “The War Prayer”By Dario Poli Apocalypse-Painting by Dario Poli aged 16 years old from “The Prophecies of Nostradamus” Published Studio Editions Ltd England & Karl Muller Verlag Germany 1995 There is considerable visual evidence shown by the international media of wars large and small currently taking place around the world, and threats of new wars being openly discussed by professional pundits, politicians, legal experts and business elites, most of whom have never been in a real conflict or faced personal danger or injury. We the ordinary public going about our everyday business, are bombarded daily in the media outlets by the word “war”; the war on want, war on drugs, war on poverty; war on carbon, war on disease, war on crime, war on illiteracy, war against injustice, war of aggression, war of words, war against racism, war against intolerance and the war on terror. It appears that mankind is in a state of eternal war against its own social problems, the class war and now cyber wars, but with no solutions in sight. We are told that war is the “price of freedom.” However from an historical perspective, in reality it usually results in the “loss of freedom” when we engage in war. The subtle infiltration of the word “war” into our subconscious is constant and needs to be understood as the ramifications can be very serious. Any war enterprise however well prepared, is a hazardous, unpredictable undertaking, resulting in horrific experiences for those who fight them, as well as for the civilians, the animal life, the waste and contamination of our natural environment, not to mention the physiological and unending psychological trauma and problems of the victims. All suffer the painful consequences, including the enormous destruction of property, infrastructure and the irreplaceable loss of priceless art, culture and civilization. All this barbarity because of the deliberate intentions and actions, of those so few in number, using laws for war, created by the few for this purpose, who lead us the majority, into these risky adventures and horrendous conflicts, that in final analysis, come to an abrupt end usually due to immense material and human destruction, the high financial losses and the sheer exhaustion of the populations involved. Conflicts always have to be resolved by some form of dialogue and peaceful agreements, despite who is the winner and loser. All wars by their very nature are vile, nasty and destructive, as the finest of our youth at the orders of the oldest, perish or are permanently disfigured in conflict. War heavily sustained by a suffocating blanket of misinformation and double speak, is death, murder, rape, torture, incarceration and ruin. War always destroys wealth and liberty and it can eradicate civilizations. According to George Orwell, ‘all the war propaganda, all the screaming and lies and hatred, comes invariably from people who are not fighting. Amazingly despite all the above knowledge of war and its consequences, this peace normally holds until the next war breaks out and then the whole grizzly business begins again with renewed vigour, each side forcefully proclaiming their just cause, ingeniously holstered onto the trusting simplicity of the enthusiastically stimulated tribal patriotism of the majority of the populations of those involved, who still obediently follow the instructions and orders of the few, as if nothing had been learned from the previous tragedy, as they march meekly into the open doors of the house of carnage, to be savagely minced in the unmerciful war machine. Their cries of pity and fear vanishing unheeded into the universal ether, together with millions of tears washed away into a river of their precious blood. Arthur Koestler observed “The most persistent sound which reverberates through men’s history is the beating of war drums.” “I confess without shame that I am tired and sick of war. Its glory is all moonshine. It is only those who have neither heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded, who cry aloud for more blood, more vengeance, more desolation. War is Hell.” ~ Civil War Union General William Tecumseh Sherman “Statesmen are the most directly responsible for the continuation of a language of violence. They should be the first to speak the language of peace.” …The Wreck of Europe, Nitti… 1922. Italy. Humans daily face thousands of ways of dying from accidents and a myriad of diseases waiting to take our lives, but this appears not to be sufficient danger for us to face. Instead we deliberately increase our own peril and survival by skilfully, often ingeniously and effectively increasing the levels of killings by wars. What an incredible waste of energy, time and resources. Wars need to end as there are no victories, and as Benjamin Franklin noted “there was never a good war or a bad peace.“ Mark Twain‘s powerful The War Prayer is a reminder of the absurdity and stupidity of war, especially for those who have to fight them and is a timely warning to us all. – Dario Poli The War PrayerBy Mark Twain It was a time of great and exalting excitement. The country was up in arms, the war was on, in every breast burned the holy fire of patriotism; the drums were beating, the bands playing, the toy pistols popping, the bunched firecrackers hissing and sputtering; on every hand and far down the receding and fading spreads of roofs and balconies a fluttering wilderness of flags flashed in the sun; daily the young volunteers marched down the wide avenue gay and fine in their new uniforms, the proud fathers and mothers and sisters and sweethearts cheering them with voices choked with happy emotion as they swung by; nightly the packed mass meetings listened, panting, to patriot oratory which stirred the deepest deeps of their hearts and which they interrupted at briefest intervals with cyclones of applause, the tears running down their cheeks the while; in the churches the pastors preached devotion to flag and country and invoked the God of Battles, beseeching His aid in our good cause in outpouring of fervid eloquence which moved every listener. It was indeed a glad and gracious time, and the half dozen rash spirits that ventured to disapprove of the war and cast a doubt upon its righteousness straightway got such a stern and angry warning that for their personal safety’s sake they quickly shrank out of sight and offended no more in that way. Sunday morning came – next day the battalions would leave for the front; the church was filled; the volunteers were there, their faces alight with material dreams – visions of a stern advance, the gathering momentum, the rushing charge, the flashing sabres, the flight of the foe, the tumult, the enveloping smoke, the fierce pursuit, the surrender! – then home from the war, bronzed heroes, welcomed, adored, submerged in golden seas of glory! With the volunteers sat their dear ones, proud, happy, and envied by the neighbors and friends who had no sons and brothers to send forth to the field of honor, there to win for the flag or, failing, die the noblest of noble deaths. The service proceeded; a war chapter from the Old Testament was read; the first prayer was said; it was followed by an organ burst that shook the building, and with one impulse the house rose, with glowing eyes and beating hearts, and poured out that tremendous invocation – “God the all-terrible! Thou who ordainest, Thunder thy clarion and lightning thy sword!” Then came the “long” prayer. None could remember the like of it for passionate pleading and moving and beautiful language. The burden of its supplication was that an ever-merciful and benignant Father of us all would watch over our noble young soldiers and aid, comfort, and encourage them in their patriotic work; bless them, shield them in His mighty hand, make them strong and confident, invincible in the bloody onset; help them to crush the foe, grant to them and to their flag and country imperishable honor and glory. An aged stranger entered and moved with slow and noiseless step up the main aisle, his eyes fixed upon the minister, his long body clothed in a robe that reached to his feet, his head bare, his white hair descending in a frothy cataract to his shoulders, his seamy face unnaturally pale, pale even to ghastliness. With all eyes following him and wondering, he made his silent way; without pausing, he ascended to the preacher’s side and stood there, waiting. With shut lids the preacher, unconscious of his presence, continued his moving prayer, and at last finished it with the words, uttered in fervent appeal,” Bless our arms, grant us the victory, O Lord our God, Father and Protector of our land and flag!” The stranger touched his arm, motioned him to step aside – which the startled minister did – and took his place. During some moments he surveyed the spellbound audience with solemn eyes in which burned an uncanny light; then in a deep voice he said “I come from the Throne – bearing a message from Almighty God!” The words smote the house with a shock; if the stranger perceived it he gave no attention. “He has heard the prayer of His servant your shepherd and grant it if such shall be your desire after I, His messenger, shall have explained to you its import – that is to say, its full import. For it is like unto many of the prayers of men, in that it asks for more than he who utters it is aware of – except he pause and think. “God’s servant and yours has prayed his prayer. Has he paused and taken thought? Is it one prayer? No, it is two – one uttered, the other not. Both have reached the ear of His Who hearth all supplications, the spoken and the unspoken. Ponder this – keep it in mind. If you beseech a blessing upon yourself, beware! lest without intent you invoke a curse upon a neighbor at the same time. If you pray for the blessing of rain upon your crop which needs it, by that act you are possibly praying for a curse upon some neighbor’s crop which may not need rain and can be injured by it. “You have heard your servant’s prayer – the uttered part of it. I am commissioned by God to put into words the other part of it – that part which the pastor, and also you in your hearts, fervently prayed silently. And ignorantly and unthinkingly? God grant that it was so! You heard these words: ‘Grant us the victory, O Lord our God!’ That is sufficient. The whole of the uttered prayer is compact into those pregnant words. Elaborations were not necessary. When you have prayed for victory you have prayed for many unmentioned results which follow victory – must follow it, cannot help but follow it. Upon the listening spirit of God the Father fell also the unspoken part of the prayer. He commandeth me to put it into words. Listen! “O Lord our Father, our young patriots, idols of our hearts, go forth to battle – be Thou near them! With them, in spirit, we also go forth from the sweet peace of our beloved firesides to smite the foe. O Lord our God, help us to tear their soldiers to bloody shreds with our shells; help us to cover their smiling fields with the pale forms of their patriot dead; help us to drown the thunder of the guns with the shrieks of their wounded, writhing in pain; help us to lay waste their humble homes with a hurricane of fire; help us to wring the hearts of their unoffending widows with unavailing grief; help us to turn them out roofless with their little children to wander unfriended the wastes of their desolated land in rags and hunger and thirst, sports of the sun flames of summer and the icy winds of winter, broken in spirit, worn with travail, imploring Thee for the refuge of the grave and denied it – for our sakes who adore Thee, Lord, blast their hopes, blight their lives, protract their bitter pilgrimage, make heavy their steps, water their way with their tears, stain the white snow with the blood of their wounded feet! We ask it, in the spirit of love, of Him Who is the Source of Love, and Who is ever-faithful refuge and friend of all that are sore beset and seek His aid with humble and contrite hearts. Amen. (After a pause) “Ye have prayed it; if ye still desire it, speak! The messenger of the Most High waits.” It was believed after wards that the man was a lunatic, because there was no sense in what he said. Twain wrote The War Prayer during the U.S. war on the Philippines. Submitted it for publication, but on March 22, 1905, it was rejected as unsuitable by Harper’s Bazaar. Twain wrote to his friend Dan Beard, “I don’t think the prayer will be published in my time. None but the dead are permitted to tell the truth.” The War Prayer remained unpublished until 1923. Dario Poli, born and educated in Scotland, is an artist, writer, music composer.He wrote magazine published articles and illustrated several published books on Nostradamus.He performed with his sister Delia in theatre and cabaret alongside many international stars and had radio TV and film to their credit. Dario, is co-author in the musical Drama on Princess Diana and is currently completing a new show titled “Amsterdam the Musical”. Futurist Portrait: Marina Gorbis Marina Gorbis is a futurist and social scientist who serves as executive director to the Institute for the Future (IFTF), a Silicon Valley nonprofit research and consulting organization. In her 14 years with IFTF, Marina has brought a futures perspective to hundreds of organizations in business, education, government, and philanthropy to improve innovation capacity, develop strategies, and design new products and services. Marina’s current research focuses on how social production is changing the face of major industries, a topic explored in detail in her book, The Nature of the Future: Dispatches from the Socialstructed World. She has also blogged and written for BoingBoing.net, FastCompany, Harvard Business Review, and major media outlets. A native of Odessa, Ukraine, yet equally at home in Silicon Valley, Europe, India, and Kazakhstan, Marina is particularly well suited to see things from a global viewpoint. She has keynoted such international events as the World Economic Forum, The Next Web Conference, NEXT Berlin, the World Business Forum, the National Association of Broadcasters annual convention, and the Western Association of Schools and Colleges annual conference. She holds a BA in psychology and a master’s of public policy from UC Berkeley. Marina on Making the Future“To paraphrase Margaret Mead, we are all immigrants to the future; none of us is a native in that land. The very underpinnings of our society and institutions — from how we work to how we create value, govern, trade, learn, and innovate — are being profoundly reshaped. We are all migrating to a new land and should be looking at the new landscape emerging before us like immigrants: ready to learn a new language, a new way of doing things, anticipating new beginnings with a sense of excitement if also with a bit of understandable trepidation.” The Future Of Education Eliminates The Classroom, Because The World Is Your Class… ”Instead of worrying about how to distribute scarce educational resources, the challenge we need to start grappling with in the era of socialstructed learning is how to attract people to dip into the rapidly growing flow of learning resources and how to do this equitably, in order to create more opportunities for a better life for more people.” The Nature of the Future: Dispatches from the Socialstructed WorldBy Marina Gorbis A vision of a reinvented world Large corporations, big governments, and other centralized organizations have long determined and dominated the way we work, access healthcare, get an education, feed ourselves, and generally go about our lives. The economist Ronald Coase, in his famous 1937 paper “The Nature of the Firm,” provided an economic explanation for this: Organizations lowered transaction costs, making the provision of goods and services cheap, efficient, and reliable. Today, this organizational advantage is rapidly disappearing. The Internet is lowering transaction costs — costs of connection, coordination, and trade — and pointing to a future that increasingly favors distributed sources and social solutions to some of our most immediate needs and our most intractable problems. As Silicon Valley thought-leader Marina Gorbis, head of the Institute for the Future, portrays, a thriving new relationship-driven or socialstructed economy is emerging in which individuals are harnessing the powers of new technologies to join together and provide an array of products and services. Examples of this changing economy range from BioCurious, a members-run and free-to-use bio lab, to the peer-to-peer lending platform Lending Club, to the remarkable Khan Academy, a free online-teaching service. These engaged and innovative pioneers are filling gaps and doing the seemingly impossible by reinventing business, education, medicine, banking, government, and even scientific research. Based on extensive research into current trends, she travels to a socialstructed future and depicts an exciting vision of tomorrow. The Nature of the Future – Marina Gorbis and David Pescovitz Agenda Watch The Future Now Show! Season Events 2014 / 2015 LondonFebruary 11, 2015the future of Collective IntelligenceLocation: The Cube, Studio 5, 155 Commercial Street, London E1 6BJThis is a collaboration between The Cube and the Club of Amsterdam. LondonApril 24, 2015the future of Metro VitalityLocation: ARUP LondonA collaboration between the Association of Professional Futurists and the Club of Amsterdam and hosted by ARUP Foresight + Research + Innovation. Special Supporters printable version