James
M. Dorsey
is an independent, geopolitical analyst based in Singapore.
Afua
Hirsch:
"It probably sounds as if I do a lot of very different things
but there is a theme that threads through everything I do: trying to
make sense of the injustice and unfairness I see in the world around
me."
Bruno
Mario:
"Chaos theories offer us 3 totally new and innovative tools. The
strange attractor / The Butterfly Effect /
Fractal images."
Lead Article
African Renaissance: When
Art Meets Power
Ethiopia / Senegal / Kenya
With Afua Hirsch
Afua
Hirsch is a Norwegian-born British writer,
broadcaster and former barrister. She has worked as a journalist for
The Guardian newspaper, and was the Social Affairs and Education Editor
for Sky News from 2014 until 2017.
Afua Hirsch shows Africa on its own terms,
exploring the histories of Ethiopia, Senegal and Kenya through their
extraordinary art, music and culture.
African Renaissance - When Art Meets Power
Ethiopia
In Ethiopia,
Afua Hirsch traces a proud 3,000-year history as significant as any
civilisation in the west. A beacon for the black diaspora, Ethiopias
story is one of defiant independence, of kings and communists, of a
country that has survived catastrophe but bounced back, underpinned
by a culture inspired by an ancient faith and devotion.
At the heart of recent
Ethiopian history is the complex reign of Emperor Haile Selassie. One
of the most influential world figures of the 20th century, he was the
midwife to African liberation and the generator of a global culture
in Rastafarianism. Yet ultimately, Haile Selassie was a tragic figure.
With renowned artist Eshetu Tiruneh, Afua explores the impact of the
1974 famine that led to the emperors downfall, and she talks to
photographer Aida Muluneh about her return from exile to the dynamic
new Ethiopia of the 21st century responding to the dark days of the
past.
African Renaissance - When Art Meets Power
Senegal
In Senegal,
a French-speaking nation of 15 million people in the far west of Africa,
Afua Hirsch discovers a country with a cultural influence far beyond
its size, with dynamic film, fashion and hip-hop scenes that have fed
off historic power struggles and culture clashes, both between ancient
empires and against French colonisers. She traces the story of Leopold
Senghor, a poet who became the father of Senegalese independence and
redefined what Africa is. She explores cities with exuberant murals
and street culture that respond to the past, and she meets internationally
acclaimed choreographer Germaine Acogny, griot musician Diabel Cissokho
and hip-hop legend DJ Awadi.
African Renaissance - When Art Meets Power
Kenya
In Kenya,
a state created barely a century ago, Afua Hirsch explores how the British
spun an idealised stereotype while carving out a brutal empire. Afua
reveals the extremes of life today, the urban sprawl and untouched outback,
and a young population still pushing away the lingering darkness of
the British imperial past.
In an epic
narrative that takes in railway building, Karen Blixen, President Jomo
Kenyatta and the brutal British suppression of the 1950s Mau Mau Uprising,
she charts how artists have responded to history happening around them.
She meets acclaimed Kenyan painters Dennis Muraguri and Michael Soi
and discusses the after-effects of the British colonial period and Chinas
growing influence as a new power in East Africa.
3 Questions:
How philosophy can address the problem of climate change
By
Kieran Setiya
MIT professor of philosophy Kieran
Setiya
explores how individuals and societies can think about and act on climate
change. - MIT
School of Humanities,
Arts, and Social Sciences (SHASS)
"Is
the obligation to act on climate change a matter of distributive justice,
restitution, or insurance against catastrophe? Which should be our focus?
These questions bridge theory and practice, moral principle and political
strategy," says philosopher Kieran Setiya. "I want my MIT
students to think about ethics beyond the limits of problem-solving,
to explore not just the demands of morality but ideals of human flourishing."
Science and technology are essential tools for innovation,
and to reap their full potential, we also need to articulate and solve
the many aspects of todays global issues that are rooted in the
political, cultural, and economic realities of the human world. With
that mission in mind, MIT's School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences
has launched "The Human Factor" an ongoing series of
stories and interviews that highlight research on the human dimensions
of global challenges. As the editors of the journal Nature have said,
framing such questions effectively incorporating all factors
that influence the issue is a key to generating successful solutions.
Contributors to this series also share ideas for advancing the multidisciplinary
collaborations needed to solve the major global issues.
Kieran Setiya is a professor
of philosophy within the MIT School of Humanities, Arts, and Social
Sciences (SHASS) who explores questions of ethics (including climate
change ethics), epistemology, and the philosophy of mind. He is the
author of two books: "Reasons without Rationalism" and "Knowing
Right From Wrong." SHASS Communications asked him to share his
thoughts on how philosophy can help people tackle the problem of climate
change.
Q: How can an understanding
of philosophy help people make better decisions about how to handle
major global issues such as climate change?
A: Whether
they acknowledge it or not, almost anyone engaged with global issues
of human well-being, the distribution of resources, or the future of
society is doing moral philosophy. The most technocratic assessment
of costs and benefits makes assumptions about what counts as cost and
benefit: about the value of human life and the demands of justice. As
John Maynard Keynes wrote 80 years ago, those who believe themselves
to be quite exempt from any intellectual influence are usually the slave
of some defunct economist or philosopher.
Making our ethics more
explicit, being self-conscious about our principles and premises, improves
our moral thinking. This is particularly true when the questions are
ones of public policy, when they operate at scales that defy intuitive
judgement, and when they threaten our complacent desire to maintain
the status quo.
The problem of climate
change is challenging in all these ways. It is unique, or unusual, in
that it leads rapidly beyond the usual terrain of political theory to
questions more abstract and existential. Why should we care about the
survival of humanity? The answer makes a difference to our assessment
of catastrophic risks. How should we think about decisions that affect
the identity of future individuals? If we do not act on climate change,
people born 50 or 100 years from now will lead impoverished lives. But
they would have been no better off if we had acted otherwise: in that
alternative history, they would not exist.
Along with problems of
identity, there are problems of time itself: Economists often discount
not only wealth but human welfare as they project into the future. Because
it compounds year by year, the discount rate swamps other factors in
the economic assessment of climate change. What forms of discounting
are ethically defensible? Philosophers have been thinking about these
questions for decades. Their ideas are relevant now.
Q: What moral questions
do we need to address as a society if we are to succeed in working together
to meet communal goals such as the emissions reduction targets set by
the 2015 Paris Agreement?
A: We know that
climate change will cause tremendous harm and that the extent of this
harm depends collectively on us. Many would agree that climate change
is a moral issue and that we are obligated to act. But there is little
clarity on the basis of our obligations or on what exactly they are.
Climate change will disproportionately
affect the developing world, hitting India and Africa especially hard.
In narrowly economic terms, a recent study saw the likely cost of 2
degrees of warming as 5 percent of GDP in India, 4 percent in Africa,
but only 0.5 percent in the United States and less in China. These facts
bear on questions of distributive justice, even apart from the causes
of climate change.
When we turn to history,
we find issues of corrective justice or restitution. More than half
of all emissions have been caused by the United States and Europe, as
they reaped the benefits of industrialization. How far can developed
nations be held accountable for past emissions? Do our obligations now
depend on the extent of our contribution to the problem?
And then there is the risk
of global climate catastrophe. This is what lies behind the 2 degree
target embraced by the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
and others. Beyond 2 degrees, there is a danger of feedback in the climate
system that would increase average temperatures by 5 or 6 degrees, threatening
human extinction.
Is the obligation to act
on climate change a matter of distributive justice, restitution, or
insurance against catastrophe? The answers are not exclusive. Which
should be our focus?
These questions bridge
theory and practice, moral principle and political strategy. We need
to address them in interpreting the common but differentiated
responsibilities of the Paris Agreement. We need to address them
in finding ways to motivate action in the present whose impact will
only be felt by future generations. And we need to address them when
we ask how far to compromise ideals of justice in the name of necessity.
How complicit should we
be with energy companies whose business model rests on catastrophic
levels of fossil fuel consumption? Or with corporations that sponsor
climate denial? These are questions for institutions like MIT. At the
same time, we face the challenge, as individuals, of maintaining hope
for the future or continuing to act without it.
Q: How do you think
the courses you teach, such as 24.02 (Moral Problems and the Good Life),
prepare MIT students to make valuable contributions to a better world
whether their field is engineering, science, or something else?
A: Teaching ethics
is a risky business. If the end is to make people better, it is open
to question whether moral philosophy is the most effective means. Some
philosophers fear that it is counter-productive. As Annette Baier once
complained, the standard introduction to ethics acquaints the
student with a variety of theories, and shows the difference in the
guidance they give. We, in effect, give courses in comparative moral
theory, and like courses in comparative religion, their usual effect
on the student is loss of faith in any of the alternatives presented.
One of my aims in 24.02
is to present moral philosophy as something more than a stalemate of
conflicting views. Moral argument is not a zero-sum game: It generates
insight and illumination. At least when they go well, courses like mine
prepare students to make a positive difference in the world in part
by convincing them that it is worth thinking about ethical questions,
that they can make progress in finding answers, and that doing so changes
lives.
In the 2016 Senior Survey,
more than 20 percent of MIT students said that working for social and
political change is not important to them at all. I dont know
what explains this statistic, but I make a point of exposing students
to some of our most urgent moral challenges, including global climate
change, and of confronting doubts about the efficacy of individual action.
At the same time, I want
students to think about ethics beyond the limits of problem-solving,
to explore not just the demands of morality but ideals of human flourishing.
What does it take to live a good and meaningful life? The value of philosophy
is partly instrumental, a tool for innovation, creativity, and civic
engagement. But it calls us to reflect on what matters in itself, not
as a means to an end or the answer to a need we would be better off
without.
When we engineer prosperity
and progress, when we struggle against injustice, what sort of lives
are we fighting for? Lives in which philosophy has an enduring place.
As Jonathan Wolff writes, with useful hyperbole: Medicine helps
us live longer; scientific advances save us time; but the arts and humanities
make it worth living longer, with time on our hands.
Interview
prepared by MIT SHASS Communications
Editorial Team: Emily Hiestand, Kathryn O'Neill
James M. Dorsey puts the current development of relations with China
into context. China is becoming an economic, military and technological
superpower. The relations with the United States and Europe will profoundly
influence the 21st century.
Keywords: China / United
States / Europe / Technology / Communication / Mobility / Common Interests
/ Military situation / Free Trade Agreements / Outlook
Shape the future
now, where near-future impact counts and visions and strategies for
preferred futures start.
Do we rise above global challenges? Or do we succumb to them? The
Future Now Show explores how we can shape our future now
- where near-future impact counts. We showcase strategies and solutions
that create futures that work.
Every month we roam through current events, discoveries, and challenges
- sparking discussion about the connection between today and the futures
we're making - and what we need, from strategy to vision - to make the
best ones.
Discrimination against women and girls is a pervasive
and long-running phenomenon that characterises Indian society at every
level.
India’s progress towards
gender equality, measured by its position on rankings such as the Gender
Development Index
has been disappointing, despite fairly rapid rates of economic
growth.
Crimes against women show
an upward trend,
in particular brutal crimes such as rapes, dowry deaths, and honour
killings. These trends are disturbing as a natural prediction would
be that with growth comes education and prosperity, and a possible decline
in adherence to traditional institutions and socially prescribed gender
roles that hold women back.
A preference for sons
Cultural institutions in India, particularly those of
patrilineality (inheritance through male descendants) and patrilocality
(married couples living with or near the husband’s parents), play a
central role in perpetuating gender inequality and ideas about gender-appropriate
behaviour.
A culturally ingrained parental preference for sons
- emanating from their importance as caregivers for parents in old age
- is linked to poorer consequences for daughters.
The dowry system, involving
a cash or in-kind payment from the bride’s family to the groom’s at
the time of marriage, is another institution that disempowers women.
The incidence of dowry payment, which is often a substantial part of
a household’s income, has been steadily
rising overtime
across all regions and socioeconomic classes.
This often results in dowry-related
violence
against women by their husbands and in-laws if the dowry is considered
insufficient or as a way to demand more payments.
These practices create
incentives for parents not to have girl children or to invest less in
girls’ health and education. Such parental preferences are reflected
in increasingly masculine sex
ratios in India.
In 2011, there were 919 girls under age six per 1000 boys, despite sex
determination being outlawed in India.
This reinforces the inferior
status of Indian women and puts them at risk of violence in their marital
households. According to the National
Family and Health Survey of 2005-06,
37% of married women have been victims of physical or sexual violence
perpetrated by their spouse.
Affirmative action
There is clearly a need for policy initiatives to empower
women as gender disparities in India persist even against the backdrop
of economic growth.
Current literature provides
pointers from policy changes that have worked so far. One unique policy
experiment in village-level governance that mandated one-third representation
for women in positions of local leadership has shown promising
results.
Evaluations of this affirmative
action policy have found that in villages led by women, the preferences
of female residents are better represented, and women
are more confident in reporting crimes
that earlier they may have considered too stigmatising to bring to attention.
Behavioural
studies
find that while in the short run there is backlash by men as traditional
gender roles are being challenged, the negative
stereotype eventually disappears.
This underscores the importance of sustained affirmative action as a
way to reduce gender bias.
Another policy change aimed
at equalising land inheritance rights between sons and daughters has
been met with a more mixed
response.
While on the one hand, it led to an increase in educational attainment
and age at marriage for daughters, on the other hand, it increased spousal
conflict leading to more domestic violence.
Improvements in labour
market prospects also have the potential to empower women. An influential
randomisation study
found that job recruiter visits to villages to provide information to
young women led to positive effects on their labour market participation
and enrolment in professional training.
This also led to an increase in age at marriage and
childbearing, a drop in desired number of children, and an increase
in school enrolment of younger girls not exposed to the programme.
Recent
initiatives
on training and recruiting young women from rural areas for factory-based
jobs in cities provide economic independence and social autonomy that
they were unaccustomed to in their parental homes.
Getting to parity
For India to maintain its position as a global growth
leader, more concerted efforts at local and national levels, and by
the private sector are needed to bring women to parity with men.
While increasing representation of women in the public
spheres is important and can potentially be attained through some form
of affirmative action, an attitudinal shift is essential for women to
be considered as equal within their homes and in broader society.
Educating Indian children from an early age about the
importance of gender equality could be a meaningful start in that direction.
This article is republished
from The
Conversation under a Creative Commons license.
> Ultralightweight,
Crush-Resistant Tensegrity metamaterials >
Horizon Europe is the EUs research and innovation framework programme
running from 2021-2027
Study
shows how century-old design principle can be a pathway to overcoming
failure
Catastrophic collapse of
materials and structures is the inevitable consequence of a chain reaction
of locally confined damage from solid ceramics that snap after
the development of a small crack to metal space trusses that give way
after the warping of a single strut.
In a study published
this week in Advanced Materials, engineers at the University of California,
Irvine and the Georgia Institute of Technology describe the creation
of a new class of mechanical metamaterials that delocalize deformations
to prevent failure. They did so by turning to tensegrity, a century-old
design principle in which isolated rigid bars are integrated into a
flexible mesh of tethers to produce very lightweight, self-tensioning
truss structures.
Tensegrity structures
have been studied for decades, particularly in the context of architectural
design, and they have recently been found in a number of biological
systems, said senior co-author Lorenzo Valdevit, a UCI professor
of materials science and engineering who directs the Architected Materials
Group. Proper periodic tensegrity lattices were theoretically
conceptualized only a few years ago by our co-author Julian Rimoli at
Georgia Tech, but through this project we have achieved the first physical
implementation and performance demonstration of these metamaterials.
The strategic planning
process focuses in particular on Pillar II of Horizon Europe, "Global
challenges and European industrial competitiveness" and also covers
relevant activities in other pillars and the Widening Participation
and Strengthening the European Research Area part.
The result of this strategic
planning is set out in a multiannual strategic plan, for preparing the
content of the work programmes covering a maximum period of four years.
Horizon Europe will support European Partnerships in which the EU, national
authorities and/or the private sector jointly commit to support the
development and implementation of a programme of research and innovation
activities.
The strategic plan contains
key strategic orientations
for research and innovation support and their targeted impact
identification of European
co-funded and co-programmed partnerships
identification of EU
missions
areas of international
cooperation
orientations on specific
issues like social sciences and humanities, gender, and the role of
key enabling technologies
The energy storage sector is becoming a pretty
crowded and competitive field as more and more companies come up with
solutions that will be absolutely crucial to dealing with the intermittency
of renewable technologies. Now theres one more technology to add
to the list that looks set for a bright future, not just as a supplier
of grid balancing power but also because of its ability to feed direct
heat energy into industrial processes and municipal heating systems.
SaltX Technology
is a Swedish renewable tech company that has set out to solve
the problems of renewable energy supply, demand, and timing.
Thermochemical energy storage is like using a rechargeable
fuel which in our case is a salt. Instead of burning it to
produce heat, the heat comes from a recharging and discharging
process that can be run over many times. ?
To charge the
salt an endothermic process is needed. To put it very simply,
the salt is dried using heat. The dry salt contains a lot
of stored chemical energy. The salt can then be discharged
by mixing it with water release this chemical energy as heat.
The unique part
with SaltX storage is that its possible to store the
dried salt at room temperature when not in use.? The technology
allows thermal energy to be stored chemically and can be released
again hours, days or even months later by just adding water.?
The salt can
be charged using renewable energy via an electric heater,
solar or waste heat. The main requirement is that this charging
heat needs to be 550°C (1022°F) or above. The discharge
of the thermochemical storage releases heat up to 450°C
(900°F), great for industrial processes and for power
generation by turning a steam turbine.
With wonder and a sense of humor, 'NATURE OBSCURA' author
Kelly Brenner aims to help us rediscover our connection to the natural
world that is just outside our front door - we just need to know where
to look.
Through explorations of
a rich and varied urban landscape, Brenner reveals the complex micro-habitats
and surprising nature found in the middle of a city. In her hometown
of Seattle, which has plowed down hills, cut through the land to connect
fresh- and saltwater, and paved over much of the rest, she exposes a
diverse range of strange and unknown creatures.
From shore to wetland,
forest to neighborhood park, and graveyard to backyard, Brenner uncovers
how our land alterations have impacted nature, for good and bad, through
the wildlife and plants that live alongside us, often unseen. These
stories meld together, in the same way our ecosystems, species, and
human history are interconnected across the urban environment.
Creative
Sustainability By Except
Integrated Sustainability
Why creativity is a necessary
and valuable asset for sustainable solutions
When we think of creativity,
the first things that come to mind are usually the arts; painting, writing,
dancing, making music, performing but we can (and should) apply
creativity as a concept much more broadly. When it comes to creating
a more sustainable society, applying our creative minds may even be
crucial.
Creativity is not limited
to the humanities and the arts, but can be involved in anything. Before
anything else, lets take a step back and ask ourselves what creativity
and being creative really means. Defining creativity has been much debated
in scholarly research and depending on who you believe there may not
be a definite meaning at all but generally, we can understand
creativity to mean using our imagination to make or think of something
new.
There are many different
ways to stimulate creativity: brainstorming, making vision boards, mind
mapping, word association
Usually, these exercises
are used for object-related problem solving, meaning our creative efforts
are directed to one thing or problem. This approach may
be more or less successful depending on your subject field, but in the
case of sustainability the results are often disappointing. Though well-intentioned,
when it comes to sustainable challenges object-related problem solving
rarely improves the root of the problem. Most of the time, it shifts
the negative impact on one area to another. For example, a product is
made eco-friendly, but under horrid working conditions or a company
manages to save energy, but pollutes the environment in the process.
Except created Symbiosis
in Development (SiD) as a way to guide their creative process and to
avoid becoming so focused on improving one thing they forget about the
rest. SiD works with systems thinking, which means that instead of only
looking for solutions for a single problem, we examine the entire system.
What happens system-wise that causes these problems? How do different
processes within this system impact and interact with each other? What
happens when we change things?
The different systems
of SiD that make up the whole. Download the (free) SiD book at thinksid.org
for more information.
SiD may work with systems, but that
doesnt mean it ignores the objects. It simply means that SiD systems
are categorized in different levels. The first of these is, in fact,
the object level, which includes physical assets like cars, trees, and
people. Next is the network level where we can see how our objects function
within and between economic, cultural and environmental relations. Lastly,
the third level combines everything from the previous two, showing the
system as a whole.
Knowing about lots of different
things from different fields and then bringing them together is what
creativity is really all about; we literally create something new by
putting together different things. Knowledge and familiarity with a
broad range of subjects will make being creative a lot easier, simply
because there are more things to choose from and think of. Creativity
flourishes in diversity. Moreover, youre more likely to come up
with something that hasnt been thought of before, because youre
not limiting yourself and your creative process to trying to combine
ideas from the same field or subject matter.
Except understands sustainability
to mean a complex, dynamic system. To come up with creative solutions
for a system where everything is connected means you need to take into
account all the different factors that are part of that system.
SiD is unique in systems
thinking because creativity is at its center; SiD considers the social,
economical, ecological, and political factors in the system of any new
challenge they approach. Creativity is, in fact, crucial: to make truly
impactful and long-lasting sustainable changes we need to change our
systems, not our objects. Because SiD is flexible and malleable to the
requirements of a project, it fits exactly what our current complex
societal challenges need a way to look at everything from all
kinds of different angles.
Everything in our world
is connected, though some connections may be less or more obvious than
others. Sometimes were so far removed from the production of the
items we use that its difficult to find out what kind of impact
the toothbrush youre using or the car youre driving had
while it was made, or will have when you no longer use it. Usually,
weve become so used to the systems we live, work and play in that
we cant imagine a different way to do things. Or the system can
seem like a mountain of problems too high to climb.
Thats where our creativity
comes in. What new things can we connect and create once we open our
minds to the opportunities? The combination with SiDs systematic
approach means that our mountains will get clear starting points with
climbing equipment combined with defined hiking trails and victory rest
stops where we can pause and appreciate the view of where weve
come so far on our journey to a more sustainable world.
An initiative launched by Quantis
in 2018, geoFootprint
was built collaboratively in partnership with more than 25 public, private
and academic stakeholders.
It was developed with the idea that spatially-explicit
footprints, calculated at global scale, would facilitate our capacity
to measure, understand and monitor how different agricultural practices
can accelerate the transition toward more sustainable food, fiber and
material production systems.
With financial support from EIT
Climate-KIC and leading agrifood companies, as well as
advisory inputs from global organizations and academic experts, geoFootprint
was developed by Quantis in partnership with arx
iT and the Cool
Farm Alliance.
Agricultural
supply chains are critical when it comes to tackling climate change,
as this often accounts for large proportions of a producers greenhouse
gas emissions. Many crop-based industries and major food producers have
set themselves ambitious environmental targets, aiming to reduce their
carbon footprint by improving the management of their supply chains.
The problem
There is a lack of environmental
data at sufficient detail for large stakeholders to effectively understand
and manage their carbon emissions. To accelerate sustainable crop supply
chain management to the necessary levels, more robust, transparent and
compatible environmental data is needed.
The goal of the geoFootprint
project, co-financed by the EIT Climate-KIC, is to bridge this data
gap, removing inconsistencies and incompatibilities between data sources
and datasets, and providing a more in-depth view of the current environmental
situation in each supply chain. Through the development of a commodity
monitoring tool designed specifically with climate footprint in mind,
geoFootprints service will determine and define the impact of
major commodities across the planet. This means producers and suppliers
will be able to monitor, track, and improve progress toward regional
and global sustainability goals.
The solution
To ensure the relevance
of the tool, geoFootprint has been developed in a collaborative initiative
involving more than 25 corporate, public, global, academic and non-profit
organisations: including consulting group Quantis in partnership with
the Cool Farm Alliance and ArxIT, it will eventually take the form of
a user-friendly online world map to measure the environmental footprint
of agricultural practices with an incredible level of detail for major
crops.
Companies and other relevant
stakeholders will have access to key environmental information to help
them make sustainable decisions and support better crop management practices.
The world map will be an online, public and collaborative tool, with
different levels of license fees depending on the depth of information
required.
geoFootprint will enhance
and merge available data to derive generic emission factors and environmental
metrics at unprecedented levels of specificity and accuracy. Its main
innovation is to use Geographic Information Systems (GIS) location technology,
allowing a 10km by 10km level of precision. Based on this, changes in
soil quality or management practices can be modelled instantaneously.
It is aimed at all stakeholders
that interact with some part of the supply chain, and will be especially
useful to those managing the most complex ones. It will allow decision-makers
in food, textiles, cosmetics, biofuel and other key industries to make
science-based choices on their supplies.
The impact
geoFootprint will empower
companies in crop-based industries with much more granular supply chain
data so they can make better environmental management decisions and
accelerate their transition toward sustainable agriculture. The tool
will also enhance our understanding of how farming practices and local
characteristics affect the environment, and how environmental changes
are affecting the supply of critically-important crops. Governments
and companies will have a new capacity to model and visualise farming
practices, and determine where the strong and weak points are in the
supply chain regarding environmental sustainability. Investments will
be more targeted, increasing their potential and letting investors directly
engage with suppliers and authorities, drawing on facts.
The tool has been scheduled
to launch in 2020. After this, several pilot projects will enable the
geoFootprint team fine-tune the tool and assess how itbest supports
science-based decisions. It is too early to say what the environmental
impacts will be but strong interest from leading companies and organizations
in crop-based industries confirms that geoFootprint meets an important
data need in this field.
It will increase the value
of information gathered by companies on environmental factors associated
with supply chain management.The data gathered through the project will
enhance climate risk information, which will lead to more secure supply
chains in a future set to the backdrop of evolving climate change.
Much of the data will be
publicly available, so everyone from smallholder farmers to international
conglomerates can see how the sector is progressing towards decarbonisation,
and find out which sustainable practices are working best and where.
Spatially sensitive data will dramatically advance our knowledge of
farming practices and their potential in mitigating both the causes
and effects of climate change.
EIT Climate-KICs role
geoFootprint is co-financed
by the EIT Climate-KIC and could not have been launched without its
support. Success so far is reflected in the repeated interest and support
from the largest food corporations in the world, as well as the support
and advice given by other key stakeholders such as the WBCSD, the Sustainable
Agriculture Initiative platform, FAO and UNEP.
The EIT Climate-KIC has
been providing almost 1 million Euro for the project. Its being
used to scaling up a prototype that Quantis had internally developed
into a global, robust and engaging platform.
The geoFootprint project
is led by environmental consulting group Quantis and formed from a consortium
of over 25 organisations from the corporate, academic, public and private
spheres. This collaboration would not have been possible without the
help of the EIT Climate-KIC.
Bruno
is often called the Futurist Monk. He has been travelling
around the world for 30 years, meeting CEOs, religious leaders, all
kinds of gurus in India and in the Silicon Valley, people in jail, super
rich people, homeless, artists, special forces, war journalists, high
level politicians, activists, successful entrepreneurs, visionary scientists,
cultural icons and everyday heroes.
Bruno is meditating every
day and reading over 100 books a year about the latest innovations in
science, technology, philosophy and spirituality. He has been experimenting
cutting-edge technologies, investigating new types of governances, exploring
new smart cities and new disruptive ways of living.
Bruno Marion is a futurist,
an expert on global trends and innovation.
Bruno has discovered that the world is getting better and worse and
faster than ever. He shows us how and why we are going through an amazing
reset in our personal lives, in our families, in our institutions
and our organizations. A world megashift of unprecedented scale and
speed!